WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.



Electronic signatures have become a cornerstone of modern business operations, streamlining processes like contract signing across industries. In China, the adoption of digital tools for labor contracts has raised questions about compliance, especially with recent legal updates. This article examines the legality of using electronic signatures for labor contracts under China’s Civil Code, while providing a neutral overview of relevant regulations and popular solutions from a business perspective.

China’s approach to electronic signatures is governed by a robust regulatory framework that balances technological innovation with legal certainty. The foundation was laid with the Electronic Signature Law of 2005, which recognizes electronic signatures as legally binding equivalents to handwritten ones, provided they meet specific reliability and integrity standards. This law distinguishes between “reliable electronic signatures” (those using cryptographic methods like digital certificates) and general electronic data, ensuring that only verified methods hold the same evidentiary weight as traditional signatures.
The Civil Code, enacted in 2020 and effective from January 1, 2021, further solidifies this by integrating electronic signatures into broader contract law principles. Article 469 explicitly states that parties may use electronic methods to form contracts, as long as the electronic form does not contradict mandatory provisions or the agreement of the parties. This update modernizes the previous Contract Law, emphasizing consent, authenticity, and non-repudiation. For electronic signatures to be valid, they must ensure the signer’s identity is verifiable, the document remains unaltered, and the process complies with data protection rules under the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) of 2021.
In the context of labor contracts, the Labor Contract Law (amended in 2012) does not explicitly prohibit electronic formats but requires written agreements for most employment terms (Article 16). The Civil Code’s provisions bridge this gap, allowing electronic labor contracts if they are reliable and accessible. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security has issued guidelines supporting digital labor management, particularly post-COVID, to facilitate remote work. However, challenges arise in proving authenticity during disputes, where courts may scrutinize the platform’s security features, such as audit trails and timestamping.
From a business observation standpoint, this framework encourages digital transformation but imposes strict compliance burdens. Enterprises must ensure platforms used for signing adhere to national standards like GB/T 35275 for electronic signatures, which mandates encryption and third-party certification. Non-compliance risks contract invalidation, as seen in cases where basic email approvals were deemed insufficient without reliable verification.
Under the new Civil Code, signing labor contracts electronically is indeed legal in China, provided certain conditions are met. This legality stems from the Code’s recognition of electronic data as a valid medium for expressing intent (Article 465), extending to employment agreements. Labor contracts, which outline terms like salary, duties, and termination, can be executed digitally if both employer and employee consent to the format and the signature method ensures integrity.
Key requirements include:
Identity Verification: The signer’s identity must be confirmed through reliable means, such as SMS codes, facial recognition, or digital certificates issued by accredited authorities like the China Information Security Certification Center (CNCA).
Document Integrity: The contract must be tamper-proof, with mechanisms like hashing and blockchain-like ledgers to prevent alterations post-signing.
Accessibility and Retention: Both parties must have access to the signed document in a readable format, retained for at least two years as per labor law mandates.
The Supreme People’s Court’s interpretations, such as the 2020 Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Cases Involving Electronic Signature Disputes, reinforce this by treating reliable electronic signatures as equivalent to wet-ink ones in litigation. For instance, in a 2022 Shanghai court ruling, an electronic labor contract signed via a certified platform was upheld against repudiation claims due to its audit log.
Businesses operating in China should note regional variations; while the Civil Code is national, provinces like Guangdong have piloted digital labor platforms integrated with local social security systems. Multinationals must also align with cross-border data rules under the Cybersecurity Law (2017), which requires data localization for sensitive HR information.
Potential pitfalls include informal digital agreements (e.g., WeChat approvals) lacking reliability, which courts may void. To mitigate, companies often opt for platforms certified under China’s trusted list, similar to the EU’s eIDAS. Overall, the Civil Code’s provisions have boosted electronic adoption, with reports from the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology indicating over 80% of new labor contracts in urban areas now involve digital elements by 2024. This shift reduces paperwork costs by up to 30% for HR departments, per industry analyses, but demands investment in compliant tools.
As Chinese firms embrace digital contracts, selecting a suitable electronic signature provider is crucial for compliance and efficiency. Below, we overview key players, focusing on their features relevant to labor contract management.
DocuSign is a global leader in electronic signatures, offering robust tools for automating contract workflows. Its eSignature platform supports customizable templates, bulk sending, and integration with HR systems like SAP SuccessFactors. For China, DocuSign complies with local laws through partnerships for digital certificates, though businesses may face higher costs for APAC-specific features like SMS delivery. Pricing starts at $10/month for personal use, scaling to enterprise custom plans with API access for automation.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in seamless integration with PDF tools and enterprise ecosystems like Microsoft 365. It provides advanced security with audit trails and supports conditional logic for dynamic labor contracts. In China, it adheres to the Electronic Signature Law via reliable verification options, but users report occasional latency in cross-border operations. Plans begin at around $10/user/month, with add-ons for identity verification.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a regionally optimized provider, supporting compliance in over 100 mainstream countries worldwide, with a strong edge in the Asia-Pacific (APAC). The APAC electronic signature landscape is fragmented, featuring high standards and stringent regulations, unlike the more framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS models in the US and EU. APAC demands “ecosystem-integrated” solutions, requiring deep hardware/API-level integrations with government-to-business (G2B) digital identities—a technical hurdle far exceeding email-based or self-declaration methods common in the West.
For Chinese businesses, eSignGlobal ensures Civil Code alignment through features like access code verification and unlimited user seats, ideal for scaling HR teams without per-seat fees. Its Essential plan, priced at $199/year (about $16.6/month), allows sending up to 100 documents for electronic signature, offering high cost-effectiveness on a compliance foundation. It seamlessly integrates with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, facilitating cross-border labor mobility. For a 30-day free trial, visit eSignGlobal’s contact page. eSignGlobal is actively competing with DocuSign and Adobe Sign globally, including in the US and EU, by providing more affordable alternatives without compromising security.

HelloSign, now under Dropbox, focuses on user-friendly signing with strong mobile support and integrations like Google Workspace. It offers templates and reminders for labor contracts, complying with China’s laws through basic encryption. Pricing is competitive at $15/month for small teams, though advanced APAC features may require upgrades. It’s suitable for SMEs but less emphasized on regional G2B integrations.
To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison of key aspects for Chinese labor contract use:
| Provider | Pricing (Entry Level) | China Compliance | Key Features for Labor Contracts | APAC Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DocuSign | $10/user/month | Supports Electronic Signature Law; digital certificates | Bulk send, templates, API automation | Global scale, but higher APAC costs | Per-seat fees; potential latency |
| Adobe Sign | $10/user/month | Aligns with Civil Code; audit trails | PDF integration, conditional fields | Enterprise ecosystems | Add-on costs for verification |
| eSignGlobal | $16.6/month (unlimited users) | Full Civil Code & regional G2B support | Unlimited seats, 100 docs/month, access codes | APAC ecosystem integrations (e.g., iAM Smart) | Less brand recognition in West |
| HelloSign | $15/month | Basic law compliance; encryption | Mobile signing, reminders | Affordable for SMEs | Limited advanced APAC features |
This table highlights trade-offs: global giants like DocuSign offer breadth, while regional players emphasize cost and localization.
In summary, electronic signatures for labor contracts are legally sound under China’s Civil Code, fostering efficiency while requiring reliable platforms. Businesses should prioritize compliance to avoid disputes. For DocuSign users seeking alternatives, eSignGlobal emerges as a regionally compliant option with strong APAC focus and value-driven pricing.
FAQs
Only business email allowed