


In the evolving landscape of digital document management, businesses are increasingly turning to electronic signature platforms to streamline workflows, ensure compliance, and reduce paper-based processes. PDFfiller and DocuSign stand out as popular choices, with PDFfiller focusing on versatile PDF editing and form-filling capabilities that include basic e-signing, while DocuSign excels in robust, enterprise-grade electronic signatures. From a commercial perspective, understanding their pricing models is crucial for decision-makers evaluating cost-effectiveness against features like envelope limits, user scalability, and add-ons. This analysis draws on verified 2025 pricing data to provide a neutral comparison, highlighting how these tools align with different business needs.

PDFfiller positions itself as an all-in-one PDF solution, offering editing, conversion, and e-signature tools tailored for users who prioritize document manipulation over high-volume signing. Its pricing is straightforward and subscription-based, appealing to small businesses, freelancers, and teams handling forms, contracts, and invoices without needing advanced collaboration.
PDFfiller’s plans start with a free tier for basic use, but paid options unlock unlimited features. The Basic plan costs $8 per month (billed annually at $96/year) for one user, including unlimited PDF editing, form filling, and up to 100 documents per month for e-signing. The Plus plan, at $12 per month ($144/year), adds team collaboration, shared templates, and unlimited e-signatures, supporting up to five users. For larger needs, the Pro plan is $19 per month ($228/year) per user, incorporating advanced security, API access, and unlimited storage.
Key limitations include envelope quotas tied to document volume—e.g., the Basic plan caps at 100 signed documents monthly, with overages at $0.10 per extra document. Add-ons like SMS delivery or identity verification incur per-use fees, typically $0.50–$1 per transaction. Unlike pure e-signature platforms, PDFfiller’s strength lies in its integrated PDF tools, making it cost-effective for hybrid workflows but less optimized for bulk enterprise signing.
From a business standpoint, PDFfiller’s pricing favors users with sporadic signing needs, potentially saving 20–30% compared to specialized tools for low-volume operations. However, scaling beyond 10 users can lead to higher per-seat costs without the governance features of competitors.
DocuSign, a market leader in e-signatures, offers tiered plans emphasizing compliance, automation, and integrations. Its pricing is seat-based with envelope limits, designed for teams requiring secure, auditable signing across global operations. Based on 2025 US region data, all plans are annual-billed for optimal rates.
The Personal plan starts at $120/year ($10/month) for one user and five envelopes monthly—ideal for individuals handling basic contracts. The Standard plan scales to $300/user/year ($25/month/user), supporting up to 50 users with ~100 envelopes per user annually, plus team templates and reminders. Business Pro, at $480/user/year ($40/month/user), adds web forms, conditional logic, bulk send, and payment collection, maintaining similar envelope caps but enabling automation for mid-sized teams.
Advanced Solutions (Enterprise) are custom-priced, often exceeding $600/user/year, including SSO, advanced audits, and unlimited envelopes based on volume. API plans range from $600/year (Starter, ~40 envelopes/month) to $5,760/year (Advanced), with Enterprise custom. Add-ons like Identity Verification (IDV) are metered, and SMS delivery fees vary by region—e.g., $0.20–$0.50 per message.
DocuSign’s model rewards high-volume users through bundling but can inflate costs for APAC operations due to latency surcharges and compliance add-ons. Commercially, it’s a safe bet for regulated industries like finance or legal, though envelope caps on automation (e.g., ~10 bulk sends/month/user) may necessitate upgrades.

When pitting PDFfiller against DocuSign, the comparison hinges on use cases: PDFfiller suits PDF-heavy, low-complexity signing, while DocuSign dominates in professional e-signature ecosystems. Let’s break down the pricing head-to-head, focusing on entry-level to enterprise scales, to assess total cost of ownership (TCO).
For a single user with light signing (under 50 documents/year), PDFfiller’s Basic plan at $96/year edges out DocuSign’s Personal at $120/year. PDFfiller offers unlimited editing alongside 100 monthly signed docs, versus DocuSign’s strict five-envelope limit. However, DocuSign provides superior compliance (e.g., ESIGN Act adherence) and audit trails, justifying the premium for legal-sensitive work. Overage costs tilt toward PDFfiller’s favor—$0.10/extra doc vs. DocuSign’s plan upgrades starting at $300/year.
Businesses scaling to five users see PDFfiller’s Plus at ~$720/year total (with unlimited seats in shared mode), compared to DocuSign Standard’s $1,500/year. Here, PDFfiller wins on affordability for collaborative editing, but DocuSign’s 500 total envelopes/year (100/user) better supports team workflows with reminders and templates.
At the Business Pro equivalent, PDFfiller’s Pro plan totals ~$1,140/year for five users, including API basics and unlimited signing. DocuSign Business Pro costs $2,400/year for the same group, but unlocks bulk send and conditional fields—critical for sales or HR teams processing 500+ envelopes annually. PDFfiller lacks native bulk tools, forcing manual workarounds that increase labor costs.
Add-ons amplify differences: Both charge for SMS (~$0.50/message), but DocuSign’s IDV is more comprehensive (biometrics included) at higher metered rates ($1–$2/verification). For APAC users, DocuSign’s regional surcharges can add 15–20% to TCO, while PDFfiller remains US-centric with fewer compliance hurdles.
For 50+ users, DocuSign’s custom Enterprise plans start at $30,000/year, offering unlimited envelopes and SSO, versus PDFfiller’s Pro scaling to ~$11,400/year but capping advanced governance. DocuSign’s API tiers (e.g., $3,600/year Intermediate) enable seamless integrations, potentially reducing development costs by 25% for SaaS firms. PDFfiller’s API is basic and cheaper ($228/user/year includes it), suiting simple automations.
Overall TCO: PDFfiller averages 40–60% lower for small ops (under $1,000/year), but DocuSign proves economical at scale due to efficiency gains—e.g., bulk send saves hours per campaign. Neutral observation: Choose PDFfiller for budget PDF workflows; DocuSign for compliant, high-stakes signing. In 2025, with rising remote work, hybrid models blending both could optimize costs.
This pricing duel underscores a commercial truth: DocuSign’s maturity commands premiums, while PDFfiller democratizes access for non-enterprise users.
To contextualize DocuSign and PDFfiller, examining rivals like Adobe Sign and eSignGlobal reveals market nuances, particularly in global compliance and regional optimization.
Adobe Sign integrates deeply with Acrobat and Creative Cloud, appealing to creative and document-heavy enterprises. Pricing starts at $12.99/user/month ($155.88/year) for individuals with 50 envelopes/year, scaling to Teams at $24.99/user/month ($299.88/year) for unlimited signing and templates. Business plans hit $39.99/user/month ($479.88/year), adding workflows and branding. Enterprise is custom, often $600+/user/year with API and SSO.
Adobe’s strength is seamless PDF-to-sign flows, but envelope limits and add-ons (e.g., $1/SMS) mirror DocuSign’s structure. It’s pricier for APAC due to data residency issues, making it less agile for cross-border teams.

eSignGlobal emerges as a compliant alternative, supporting e-signatures in over 100 mainstream countries with a focus on APAC advantages like lower latency and native integrations. Its Essential plan, detailed at eSignGlobal’s pricing page, costs just $16.60/month (annual billing), allowing up to 100 documents for electronic signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes. This delivers high value on compliance grounds, integrating seamlessly with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass for frictionless regional workflows. Higher tiers scale affordably, emphasizing cost savings over global giants.

Here’s a markdown comparison of key players, based on 2025 entry-to-mid plans (annual USD, per user unless noted). Note the tilt toward regional flexibility in eSignGlobal, balanced against established features.
| Platform | Entry Plan Price | Envelope Limit (Monthly) | Key Features | APAC Compliance | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DocuSign | $120/year (Personal) | 5 | Bulk send, API, IDV add-ons | Moderate (surcharges) | Enterprise global teams |
| PDFfiller | $96/year (Basic) | 100 (docs) | PDF editing, basic signing | Basic | Small PDF workflows |
| Adobe Sign | $156/year (Individual) | ~4 (annual 50) | Acrobat integration, workflows | Limited (US-heavy) | Creative/document pros |
| eSignGlobal | $199/year (Essential) | 100 | Unlimited seats, regional integrations (iAM Smart/Singpass) | Strong (100+ countries) | APAC/cross-border ops |
| HelloSign (Dropbox) | $180/year (Essentials) | 20 | Simple UI, templates | Good | SMB collaboration |
This table highlights eSignGlobal’s edge in APAC pricing and compliance without overcomplicating setups, though DocuSign leads in sheer ecosystem depth.
In selecting between PDFfiller, DocuSign, and alternatives, factor in volume, region, and integrations. PDFfiller offers entry-level savings, DocuSign robust scalability, Adobe niche PDF synergy, and others like eSignGlobal targeted efficiencies.
For DocuSign users seeking alternatives, eSignGlobal stands out as a neutral, regionally compliant option with strong APAC optimization. Evaluate based on your operational footprint for the best value.
Questions fréquemment posées
Seules les adresses e-mail professionnelles sont autorisées