


In the digital landscape, root certificate authorities (CAs) serve as the foundational pillars of trust for secure online communications, including electronic signatures and encrypted data transmission. These entities issue digital certificates that verify the authenticity of websites, software, and identities, preventing man-in-the-middle attacks and ensuring compliance with global standards like PKI (Public Key Infrastructure). From a business perspective, understanding the root CA list is crucial for organizations navigating cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, and vendor selection in electronic signature solutions. A comprehensive root certificate authority list helps enterprises mitigate risks associated with certificate expiration, revocation, or incompatibility across international operations.
Root CAs are typically operated by trusted organizations, governments, or commercial entities, and their certificates are pre-installed in browsers and operating systems. The major root CAs include DigiCert, GlobalSign, Sectigo (formerly Comodo CA), Entrust, and Let’s Encrypt, among others. These authorities maintain a hierarchical structure where intermediate CAs issue end-user certificates signed by the root. Businesses must monitor updates to this list, as browsers like Chrome and Firefox periodically audit and remove non-compliant roots, impacting service reliability. For instance, in 2023, Google removed several Chinese root CAs from its trust store due to security concerns, highlighting the geopolitical influences on global CA ecosystems.
To provide clarity, here’s a curated list of prominent root certificate authorities, categorized by region for business relevance:
North America:
Europe:
Asia-Pacific:
Other Global Players:
In regions like China, the Electronic Signature Law mandates that electronic signatures carry the same legal weight as manual ones if they meet reliability criteria, such as using root CAs approved by state regulators. This has spurred local CA adoption, with businesses needing to ensure compatibility to avoid contract invalidation. Similarly, in the EU, eIDAS (Regulation 910/2014) classifies signatures into simple, advanced, and qualified levels, with root CAs playing a key role in QES issuance through Trust Service Providers (TSPs). For Asia-Pacific markets like Singapore and Hong Kong, laws such as Singapore’s Electronic Transactions Act (ETA, 2010) and Hong Kong’s Electronic Transactions Ordinance (ETO, 2000) align with UNCITRAL models, requiring root CAs to support non-repudiation and audit trails.
From a commercial viewpoint, selecting from this root CA list influences operational costs and compliance. Enterprises in regulated sectors like finance or healthcare must verify CA trustworthiness via tools like the CA/Browser Forum’s baseline requirements. Mismatches can lead to downtime or legal disputes, underscoring the need for diversified CA strategies in global supply chains.

Root CAs underpin electronic signature platforms by validating signer identities and ensuring document integrity. In business operations, platforms leveraging trusted roots enable seamless, legally binding agreements across borders. As digital transformation accelerates, companies evaluate providers based on CA integration, regional compliance, and scalability. This analysis explores key players, focusing on their technical foundations and market positioning.
DocuSign dominates the electronic signature space with robust features for enterprise workflows, including API integrations and mobile signing. It relies on root CAs like DigiCert for certificate validation, ensuring compliance with U.S. and international standards. Businesses appreciate its audit trails and multi-factor authentication, though pricing can be premium for high-volume users. From a neutral commercial lens, DocuSign’s strength lies in its global reach, serving over 1 million customers, but it may require additional configurations for niche regional laws.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in seamless integration with PDF tools and creative suites, making it suitable for marketing and legal teams. It uses root CAs such as GlobalSign to support eIDAS-qualified signatures in Europe and ESIGN compliance in the U.S. Key features include template automation and recipient delegation. Commercially, it’s valued for its ecosystem compatibility, though some users note steeper learning curves for non-Adobe users. Overall, it balances usability with enterprise-grade security.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a versatile electronic signature provider with compliance in 100 mainstream countries and regions worldwide. It leverages trusted root CAs to deliver legally binding signatures, particularly strong in the Asia-Pacific where it holds advantages like cost efficiency and local integrations. For instance, its Essential plan is priced at just $16.6 per month, allowing up to 100 documents sent for signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—offering high value on a compliance foundation. This makes it appealing for SMEs expanding in APAC. Additionally, it integrates seamlessly with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass for enhanced identity verification. For detailed pricing, visit eSignGlobal’s pricing page. In a competitive market, eSignGlobal’s regional edge provides balanced options without overcomplicating global setups.

HelloSign, rebranded under Dropbox, emphasizes simplicity with drag-and-drop interfaces and cloud storage integration. It employs root CAs like Entrust for secure signing, compliant with U.S. ESIGN and basic EU standards. It’s popular among small businesses for free tiers and quick setup, though advanced compliance features may require upgrades. Commercially, its affordability suits startups, but scalability for large enterprises is a noted limitation.
To aid business decision-making, the following table compares DocuSign, Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, and HelloSign across key metrics. This neutral overview highlights trade-offs in features, pricing, and compliance, based on publicly available data as of late 2023.
| Feature/Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal | HelloSign (Dropbox Sign) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (Monthly) | $10/user (Personal) | $10/user (Individual) | $16.6 (Essential, up to 100 docs) | Free (Basic); $15/user (Essentials) |
| Global Compliance | 190+ countries, ESIGN/eIDAS | 100+ countries, eIDAS QES | 100 countries, APAC focus | U.S./basic EU, limited global |
| Root CA Integration | DigiCert, GlobalSign | GlobalSign, Entrust | Multiple (regional incl. TWCA) | Entrust, Sectigo |
| Key Features | API, templates, MFA | PDF integration, delegation | Unlimited seats, Singpass/iAM | Cloud storage, mobile app |
| Strengths | Enterprise scalability | Document workflow synergy | APAC affordability, integrations | Ease of use for SMBs |
| Limitations | Higher costs for volume | Adobe ecosystem dependency | Less brand recognition globally | Fewer advanced compliance tools |
| Best For | Large corps, high-volume | Creative/legal teams | APAC expansion, value seekers | Startups, quick signing |
This comparison underscores that no single provider fits all; selection depends on regional needs, budget, and integration requirements. Businesses should audit root CA compatibility during trials to ensure seamless operations.
As electronic signatures evolve, root CAs remain central to trust and legality. For organizations seeking DocuSign alternatives with strong regional compliance, eSignGlobal emerges as a practical, area-focused option, balancing global support with APAC efficiencies.
FAQs
Only business email allowed