eSignGlobal vs Adobe Sign

Yes. eSignGlobal complies with international standards such as ESIGN and eIDAS. Unlike Adobe Sign, which has limited support for Mainland China and lacks local identity verification in Hong Kong, eSignGlobal provides deep local compliance including CA certificates, HK iAM Smart, and SG Singpass.

Yes. Unlike Adobe Sign’s seat-based pricing where costs rise with every new user, eSignGlobal Professional supports unlimited members. This allows your entire organization—from HR to Sales—to use the platform without skyrocketing licensing fees.

Absolutely. Your existing contract templates and signing logic (parallel or sequential) can be easily replicated in eSignGlobal. Additionally, while Adobe often restricts advanced API access to high-tier plans, eSignGlobal provides full OpenAPI access in the Professional version to ensure a seamless system integration.

The primary difference lies in the billing model. Adobe Sign charges per user, which creates significant cost pressure as teams scale. eSignGlobal uses a transparent, non-seat-based subscription model, helping enterprises reduce their average TCO by 30%–50%.