


In the UK, electronic signatures have become a cornerstone of efficient business operations, particularly in sectors like finance, real estate, and legal services. However, integrating them with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance requires careful navigation of regulatory frameworks to mitigate risks such as fraud and illicit financial flows. From a business perspective, ensuring compliance not only avoids hefty fines—up to £1 million under UK law—but also builds trust with clients and regulators.
The UK’s electronic signature landscape is governed primarily by the Electronic Communications Act 2000, which recognizes e-signatures as legally binding equivalents to wet-ink signatures, provided they meet evidentiary standards. This is further aligned with the EU’s eIDAS Regulation (retained post-Brexit via the Electronic Identification, Authentication and Trust Services Regulations 2016), categorizing signatures into Simple, Advanced, and Qualified levels. For AML purposes, the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017) mandate robust customer due diligence (CDD), including identity verification and transaction monitoring. Businesses must ensure e-signatures do not bypass these checks, especially in high-risk activities like property transactions or financial agreements.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
Achieving AML compliance with e-signatures involves a multi-layered approach, blending technology, processes, and oversight. Businesses should start by conducting a risk assessment under MLR 2017 to identify vulnerabilities in their e-signature workflows. For instance, in financial services, where AML scrutiny is intense, platforms must integrate real-time identity checks to prevent anonymous or forged signatures.
The cornerstone of AML compliance is verifying the signer’s identity to the standard required by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Under MLR 2017, firms must apply CDD measures, such as collecting government-issued ID (e.g., passport or driving license) and proof of address. e-Signature tools should support advanced verification methods like biometric authentication or integration with trusted third-party services, such as the UK’s Post Office Verify or electronic Know Your Customer (eKYC) providers.
In practice, opt for platforms that offer Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES) compliant with eIDAS, which include cryptographic certificates from a Qualified Trust Service Provider (QTSP). This ensures non-repudiation—proving the signer is who they claim—reducing money laundering risks in transactions over £15,000, where enhanced due diligence is mandatory.
AML regulations require ongoing monitoring of transactions to detect suspicious patterns, such as unusual signing volumes or geographic anomalies. e-Signature platforms must generate immutable audit logs capturing every action: who signed, when, from where (via IP geolocation), and any attached documents. These logs should be tamper-proof and exportable for FCA audits.
For UK businesses, integrate e-signatures with AML software like Thomson Reuters or NICE Actimize. This allows automated flagging of red flags, such as a high-value contract signed from a high-risk jurisdiction. Retain records for at least five years, as stipulated by MLR 2017, to support investigations.
Data protection is intertwined with AML, governed by the UK GDPR. e-Signature providers must encrypt documents in transit and at rest, using standards like AES-256. Avoid platforms that store sensitive data outside the UK or EEA without adequacy decisions, to prevent unauthorized access that could facilitate laundering.
Conduct vendor due diligence: Verify the provider’s ISO 27001 certification and compliance with the Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD2) for financial integrations. In cross-border deals, align with the UK’s sanctions regime under the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) by screening signers against watchlists during the signing process.
Compliance is as much about people as technology. Under MLR 2017, senior management must oversee AML programs, including training on e-signature risks. Develop internal policies mandating dual approvals for high-risk signings and regular penetration testing of e-signature systems.
For sectors like real estate—prone to money laundering via property flips—use conditional logic in e-signatures to require AML declarations before finalizing. Periodically review and update workflows based on FCA guidance, such as the 2023 updates emphasizing digital identity in CDD.
Selecting the right platform is critical. Look for those certified under eIDAS and integrated with UK-specific AML tools. In a 2024 survey by the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG), 68% of firms reported improved compliance through automated e-signature verification, reducing manual errors by 40%.
By following these steps, UK businesses can leverage e-signatures’ efficiency while upholding AML standards, potentially cutting compliance costs by 25-30% through automation.
Several platforms support UK AML needs, each with strengths in verification and integration. From a neutral business viewpoint, the choice depends on scale, cost, and regional focus.
DocuSign is a market leader, offering eSignature with built-in identity verification options like DocuSign ID Check, which uses knowledge-based authentication and document uploads. It complies with eIDAS for Advanced Electronic Signatures (AES) and integrates with UK AML tools via APIs. Pricing starts at £25/user/month for Standard plans, with add-ons for SMS delivery and bulk sends. It’s ideal for large firms needing SSO and audit trails, though API costs can add up for high-volume users.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, emphasizes workflow automation and complies with eIDAS through its cloud signature services. It supports biometric verification and integrates with enterprise systems like Microsoft 365, aiding AML monitoring. UK businesses appreciate its GDPR alignment and customizable fields for CDD data collection. Plans begin at around £20/user/month, making it suitable for creative and legal teams, but it may require additional plugins for advanced AML screening.

eSignGlobal provides eSignature solutions compliant in over 100 mainstream countries, including full UK eIDAS support for AES and QES. It excels in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, where electronic signature regulations are fragmented, high-standard, and strictly regulated—often requiring “ecosystem-integrated” approaches with deep hardware/API integrations to government digital identities (G2B). Unlike the more framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS standards in the US/EU, APAC demands seamless ties to systems like Hong Kong’s iAM Smart or Singapore’s Singpass, which eSignGlobal handles natively, lowering technical barriers compared to email-based or self-declaration methods common in the West.
For UK users, its unlimited user seats and Essential plan at just $16.6/month (USD equivalent) allow sending up to 100 documents with access code verification, offering strong value on compliance foundations. This pricing undercuts competitors while supporting bulk sends and AI-driven risk assessments, positioning it well for global firms with APAC exposure.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
HelloSign offers straightforward e-signing with template-based workflows and basic audit trails, compliant with UK laws via AES support. It’s geared toward SMBs, with integrations for Google Workspace, but lacks deep AML-specific features like biometric checks, starting at £12/user/month.
| Feature/Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal | HelloSign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eIDAS Compliance | AES & QES | AES | AES & QES (100+ countries) | AES |
| Identity Verification | ID Check, Biometrics (add-on) | Biometrics, eKYC | Access Codes, iAM Smart/Singpass | Basic Uploads |
| AML Integration | API for Screening | Workflow Automation | AI Risk Assessment, Bulk CDD | Limited Audit Logs |
| Pricing (Entry Level, per User/Month) | £25 | £20 | $16.6 (Unlimited Users) | £12 |
| Strengths for UK | Enterprise Scalability | Microsoft Integration | APAC/Global Flexibility | Simplicity for SMBs |
| Limitations | Higher API Costs | Plugin Dependencies | Less Known in UK | Shallow AML Tools |
This table highlights neutral trade-offs: DocuSign for robustness, Adobe for ecosystems, eSignGlobal for cost-efficiency in multi-region ops, and HelloSign for ease.
In summary, UK businesses navigating AML with e-signatures should prioritize verified platforms. For DocuSign users seeking alternatives, eSignGlobal offers a regionally compliant, value-driven option.
Questions fréquemment posées
Seules les adresses e-mail professionnelles sont autorisées