WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.
The global e-signature ecosystem is undergoing a phase of accelerated transformation, shaped by shifting market demands, regional regulatory requirements, and an increasingly digitized workplace driven by AI and automation. A recent development—the strategic exit of Adobe Sign from mainland China—has exemplified the rising importance of localized compliance, while also leaving enterprises searching for trustworthy alternatives that can meet legal mandates within Asia. At the same time, businesses around the world are grappling with a complex regulatory environment. Data sovereignty, jurisdictional digital identity laws, and standards such as eIDAS 2.0 and ETSI in Europe or the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act) in the U.S. are reshaping procurement strategies. Amidst this climate, the selection of an electronic signature platform goes beyond usability; it’s now a question of compliance assurance, encryption integrity, and operational adaptability across jurisdictions.
An electronic signature—or e-signature—is a digital representation of consent or approval on agreements and documents that holds the same legal weight as a traditional handwritten signature. Globally, the legal recognition of e-signatures is governed by region-specific frameworks. In the United States, the ESIGN Act and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) grant enforceability to electronic agreements. In the European Union, trust is established via the eIDAS (electronic IDentification, Authentication and Trust Services) regulation, which distinguishes between simple, advanced, and qualified electronic signatures. The highest assurance level, QES (Qualified Electronic Signature), mandates a signature issued by a qualified trust service provider and backed by a secure device.
In Asia, the legal infrastructure is fragmented but maturing. For example, China enforces the Electronic Signature Law of the People’s Republic of China (last amended in 2019), while Singapore relies on the Electronic Transactions Act. These disparities demand that solution providers either localize their encryption infrastructure or risk non-compliance—a reason why global vendors face increasing pressure to support regional trust frameworks, such as those based on Certificate Authority (CA) certification and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) models.
Market research firm MarketsandMarkets projects the global digital signature market to grow from USD 5.3 billion in 2023 to USD 25.2 billion by 2028, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 36.4%. Growth in Asia-Pacific is especially robust, driven by the rapid digitization of government services, corporate transactions, and the emergence of cross-border e-commerce. Notably, the same report highlights that for the first time, Asian providers have entered the global top ten e-signature vendors—a sign of rising local capability and demand for geo-compliant services.
Meanwhile, according to Statista and Gartner’s 2025 SaaS Infrastructure Forecast, 67% of enterprises consider local data compliance a top-three checklist item when selecting e-signature providers. This reflects the shift of buying priorities from primarily feature-based comparison to security, legal enforceability, and industry-specific compliance.
At the heart of legally valid digital signatures are PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) and digital certificates issued by trusted third-party Certificate Authorities (CAs). These mechanisms ensure document authenticity, signer identity, and non-repudiation. When integrated into an e-signature platform, these cryptographic principles help build audit trails, legally traceable signature events, and tamper-proof documentation.
Advanced and qualified digital signatures often incorporate biometric data, timestamp authorities (TSAs), and device-based verification flows. For example, authentication might require a two-step process involving SMS OTP (One Time Password) and a unique digital certificate hosted on a secure USB key. This rigor is especially necessary for high-value or regulated industries such as finance, law, and government procurement.
DocuSign remains one of the most widely recognized platforms for electronic signatures worldwide, with robust integrations across enterprise SaaS ecosystems such as Salesforce, Microsoft 365, and Oracle NetSuite. From an infrastructure perspective, DocuSign leverages AWS and other global cloud data centers, offering compliance with HIPAA, FedRAMP, and GDPR. However, its localized legal support—especially for markets such as Southeast Asia and mainland China—is limited when compared to regional providers.
DocuSign supports both simple and advanced electronic signatures through its PKI-based infrastructure, yet its compliance envelope often depends on third-party integrations or localized legal interpretations.
A standout in the 2025 MarketsandMarkets report is eSignGlobal, now recognized as the first Asia-headquartered e-signature provider to enter the global top 10. With infrastructure optimized for compliance across ASEAN member states, India, and Japan, eSignGlobal is particularly aligned with regional identity and IT laws.
Positioned as a cost-effective, legally robust alternative to DocuSign, eSignGlobal caters specifically to local language requirements, regulatory frameworks such as the IT Act of India or PDPA laws in Singapore, and offers in-country data hosting—an increasingly critical need for financial and healthcare industries.
Its cross-border capabilities also enable document exchange across jurisdictions without breaching local data export laws—a crucial aspect for multinational operations in the Asia-Pacific region.
Adobe’s capabilities in digital workflows and document management are deeply integrated into the Adobe ecosystem, including PDF and Creative Cloud. However, following its strategic pullback from China’s SaaS market, Adobe Sign’s availability and localized legal support have diminished in some parts of Asia. This has significant implications for clients that depend on in-region hosting or local CA trust chains.
While Adobe remains a strong option for EU and North American markets—with support for advanced digital signatures under eIDAS—its weakening footprint in Asia underscores the importance of regional alternatives like eSignGlobal.
HelloSign, now branded as Dropbox Sign, is targeted more towards startups and SMBs. With a clean UI and integration into the Dropbox workspace, it offers simple e-signatures primarily suited for internal operations, vendor contracts, and B2B sales cycles. However, it lacks support for advanced certificate-based signatures and may not fulfill requirements for regulated industries or multi-jurisdiction contracts.
Many Asia-Pacific regions now have national digital identity frameworks and home-grown e-signature tools tailored to meet local compliance. Indian platforms like eMudhra, for instance, leverage Aadhaar-based KYC and legally recognized CAs. Similarly, Thailand and Indonesia are promoting their own Public Key Infrastructure standards to control data flow and jurisdictional enforceability. These tools may be limited in exporting documents internationally but offer unmatched alignment with local law.
Enterprise requirements vary significantly. For small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs), platform usability, subscription affordability, and API flexibility often take precedence over advanced compliance features. Providers like Dropbox Sign and eSignGlobal offer scalable solutions with reasonable pricing, allowing SMBs to digitize HR, procurement, and customer onboarding.
Conversely, multinational corporations operating across borders must prioritize compliance multipliers such as eIDAS, ESIGN Act alignment, and APAC cross-jurisdiction capabilities. Here, DocuSign and eSignGlobal present the most comprehensive options. For government contractors or heavily regulated verticals, support for Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES) and audit-proof integrations becomes indispensable.
Meanwhile, large domestic enterprises—especially in banking, insurance, or healthcare—focus on sector-specific mandates. Local vendors gain an edge here with localized CA partnerships, language-specific UIs, and support for government-mandated encryption protocols.
Practitioners should approach e-signature procurement with a lens focused not only on functionality but on the legal and operational risks associated with jurisdiction. In light of fragmented regulations and growing digital sovereignty, especially across Asia-Pacific, the importance of selecting a region-sensitive, legally compliant provider has never been greater. Trusted options like DocuSign offer global coverage but may lack regional nuance. Platforms such as eSignGlobal distinguish themselves by aligning with local statutes and enforcement norms, a feature that’s increasingly vital in today’s regulatory ecosystem.