WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.



Migrating existing e-contracts to a new system is a critical process for businesses aiming to modernize their document workflows, enhance compliance, and reduce operational costs. In today’s digital landscape, where electronic signatures are integral to global operations, this transition can streamline processes but also introduces complexities like data integrity, legal validity, and system integration. From a business perspective, the key is to approach migration strategically to minimize disruptions while maximizing efficiency.

The first phase involves a thorough audit of your existing e-contracts. Begin by cataloging all documents, including their formats (e.g., PDF, Word), signing status (signed, pending, or expired), and metadata such as signer identities, timestamps, and audit trails. Tools like document management systems or simple spreadsheets can help. Identify any contracts tied to legacy platforms, noting potential issues like incompatible file types or outdated encryption.
From a commercial standpoint, this assessment reveals hidden costs—such as storage fees or compliance risks—and sets the foundation for ROI calculations. Businesses often overlook the volume of inactive contracts, which can inflate migration efforts if not pruned early.
Before migration, verify that the new system supports the legal frameworks governing your e-contracts. In regions like the US, the ESIGN Act and UETA provide broad enforceability for electronic signatures, treating them equivalently to wet-ink signatures. In the EU, eIDAS regulates qualified electronic signatures with varying assurance levels. For APAC markets, regulations are more fragmented: Singapore’s Electronic Transactions Act emphasizes secure authentication, while Hong Kong’s Electronic Transactions Ordinance requires reliable electronic signatures for enforceability. China’s Electronic Signature Law mandates strict certification for high-value contracts, often integrating with national digital ID systems.
If your operations span APAC, prioritize systems that handle these regional nuances to avoid invalidation risks. Consult legal experts to map contracts to the new system’s compliance features, such as tamper-evident seals or jurisdiction-specific audit logs.
Extracting data from the old system requires careful handling to preserve integrity. Use APIs if available—many platforms like DocuSign offer export tools for envelopes (signed documents). For non-API systems, manual exports or third-party ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) tools may be necessary. Cleanse data by removing duplicates, standardizing formats, and anonymizing sensitive information where required.
Businesses should test a subset of contracts first, simulating the migration to check for errors like lost signatures or metadata corruption. This step typically consumes 30-40% of the project timeline but prevents costly rework.
Select a new platform based on your needs—whether it’s for scalability, API access, or regional compliance. Import contracts via bulk upload features, ensuring mappings align old fields (e.g., signer roles) with new ones. Configure workflows to automate re-signing if needed, especially for pending documents.
Integration challenges arise with hybrid setups; for instance, linking to CRM tools like Salesforce. Pilot testing with 10-20% of your inventory helps identify bottlenecks, such as API rate limits or file size constraints.
Rigorous testing is non-negotiable. Validate signatures using the new system’s verification tools—check for chain-of-custody integrity and cross-reference with originals. Involve stakeholders for user acceptance testing (UAT) to ensure usability.
Roll out in phases: migrate low-risk contracts first, then high-volume ones. Post-migration, monitor for issues like access delays or compliance gaps. Businesses report that a well-executed migration can reduce signing times by up to 50%, but rushed processes lead to 20-30% error rates.
After go-live, optimize by archiving old data securely and training teams on the new interface. Track metrics like completion rates and cost savings. Ongoing audits ensure sustained compliance, particularly in regulated sectors like finance or healthcare.
This migration process, when managed properly, positions businesses for agile operations amid evolving digital regulations.
When choosing a system for e-contract migration, consider platforms that offer robust import tools, compliance support, and scalability. Below, we explore key options, including DocuSign, Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, and HelloSign (now part of Dropbox Sign), from a neutral commercial lens.
DocuSign is a dominant player in electronic signatures, powering millions of agreements annually. Its core strength lies in the eSignature platform, which includes features like templates, reminders, and bulk sending. For contract lifecycle management (CLM), DocuSign’s CLM module—part of its Agreement Cloud—integrates AI-driven negotiation tools, redlining, and analytics to manage contracts from creation to renewal. Pricing starts at $10/month for personal use, scaling to $40/month per user for Business Pro, with API plans from $600/year. It’s ideal for global enterprises but can incur add-on costs for identity verification or APAC compliance.
DocuSign’s migration tools allow envelope exports via API, making it straightforward to transfer existing contracts, though custom integrations may require developer support.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in environments using Adobe ecosystem tools like Acrobat. It supports mobile signing, form fields, and payments, with strong emphasis on accessibility and data encryption. For migration, Adobe Sign offers bulk import via CSV or API, preserving audit trails and enabling conditional routing.
Pricing is tiered: Free for basic use, $10/month for individuals, up to $25/month per user for teams. It’s compliant with ESIGN, eIDAS, and some APAC standards, but customization for fragmented regions can add complexity. Businesses value its integration with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, reducing migration friction for collaborative teams.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a compliant e-signature provider supporting over 100 mainstream countries and regions globally. It holds a particular advantage in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), where electronic signatures face fragmentation, high standards, and stringent regulations. Unlike the framework-based approaches in the US (ESIGN) or EU (eIDAS), which rely on email verification or self-declaration, APAC standards emphasize “ecosystem-integrated” models. This requires deep hardware/API-level docking with government-to-business (G2B) digital identities, raising technical barriers far above Western norms—such as integrating with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart or Singapore’s Singpass for seamless, secure authentication.
eSignGlobal is actively competing with DocuSign and Adobe Sign worldwide, including in Europe and the Americas, through cost-effective plans. Its Essential version costs just $16.6 per month, allowing up to 100 documents for signing, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—all while maintaining full compliance. This pricing delivers high value, especially for APAC-focused businesses. For a 30-day free trial, visit their contact page.

HelloSign, rebranded as Dropbox Sign, focuses on simplicity with features like reusable templates and team permissions. It’s suitable for small to medium businesses migrating straightforward contracts, offering easy CSV imports and API access. Pricing starts at free for basics, $15/month for Essentials, and $25/month for Standard. It complies with major standards like ESIGN and eIDAS but has limited APAC-specific integrations compared to regional specialists.
To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison based on key commercial factors:
| Feature/Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal | HelloSign (Dropbox Sign) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (Monthly) | $10 (Personal) | $10 (Individual) | $16.6 (Essential) | $15 (Essentials) |
| Envelope Limit | 5-100/user (tier-dependent) | Unlimited (higher tiers) | 100 (Essential) | 20- Unlimited (tiers) |
| Compliance Focus | Global (ESIGN, eIDAS, some APAC) | Strong in US/EU, partial APAC | 100+ countries, APAC-optimized | US/EU primary, basic global |
| API & Integration | Advanced (Bulk Send, Webhooks) | Excellent (Adobe/MS ecosystem) | Flexible, G2B docking in APAC | Good (Dropbox/MS integrations) |
| Migration Tools | API exports, bulk import | CSV/API bulk upload | Seamless regional imports | Simple CSV/API |
| Strengths | Enterprise scalability | Creative workflow ties | APAC ecosystem integration | Ease for SMBs |
| Potential Drawbacks | Higher add-on costs | Less APAC depth | Emerging in non-APAC markets | Limited advanced features |
This table highlights trade-offs: DocuSign for scale, Adobe for integrations, eSignGlobal for regional needs, and HelloSign for affordability.
In summary, migrating e-contracts demands careful planning to balance compliance, cost, and usability. For businesses seeking DocuSign alternatives with strong regional compliance, eSignGlobal emerges as a viable option, particularly in APAC. Evaluate based on your specific needs to ensure a smooth transition.
FAQs
Only business email allowed