


In today’s fast-paced business landscape, teams rely heavily on integrated tools to boost productivity without disrupting workflows. Microsoft Teams has become a central hub for communication, and integrating electronic signature solutions like DocuSign directly into it addresses a key pain point: the need to sign documents seamlessly without switching applications. This integration allows users to prepare, send, and execute agreements right from the chat interface, saving time and reducing friction in remote and hybrid work settings.
The DocuSign for Microsoft Teams app, available through the Teams App Store, embeds eSignature capabilities into channels, chats, and meetings. From a business perspective, this is particularly valuable for sales teams closing deals during video calls or HR departments handling offer letters in group discussions. Observers note that such integrations align with the growing demand for “zero-context switching,” where employees can complete tasks in their primary collaboration tool, potentially increasing adoption rates by up to 30% according to industry reports on workflow efficiency.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
DocuSign’s integration with Microsoft Teams focuses on embedding its eSignature platform directly into the Teams ecosystem. Users can upload documents from OneDrive or local storage, add signers (including Teams members), and route them for signatures without leaving the chat window. For instance, during a Teams meeting, a user can initiate a signing request by typing a command like “/docusign” in the chat, which opens a pane for document selection and field placement. This is powered by DocuSign’s eSignature product, which handles the backend processing while keeping the user experience native to Teams.
From a commercial standpoint, this setup minimizes email back-and-forth, a common bottleneck in document workflows. Businesses report faster turnaround times—often reducing signing cycles from days to hours—especially in global teams where time zones complicate traditional methods. The integration supports features like real-time notifications in Teams channels when a document is signed, ensuring transparency and accountability.
To illustrate the practicality, consider a typical sales scenario. A deal is discussed in a Teams channel, and the contract needs immediate review.
Initiate from Chat: In a one-on-one chat or group channel, select the DocuSign app from the Apps menu. Upload the document or pull it from SharePoint/OneDrive integration.
Prepare the Document: Use the in-app editor to drag-and-drop signature fields, date stamps, and checkboxes. DocuSign’s templates can be pre-loaded for recurring agreements, such as NDAs or vendor contracts.
Add Signers and Send: Tag Teams members as signers or enter external emails. The system generates a secure link, sent via Teams notification rather than separate email.
Sign and Track: Recipients click the link within Teams to sign on mobile or desktop. Progress updates appear in the chat, with audit trails accessible via DocuSign’s dashboard, which also syncs with Teams for reporting.
Completion and Storage: Once signed, the final document auto-saves to OneDrive or SharePoint, with a confirmation message posted in the Teams thread.
This process leverages DocuSign’s API to ensure compliance with standards like ESIGN and eIDAS, making it suitable for regulated industries. However, users should note that while the signing is seamless, advanced customizations (e.g., conditional fields) may require navigating to the full DocuSign web app for complex setups.
DocuSign extends beyond basic eSignatures through its Intelligent Agreement Management (IAM) suite, which includes Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) tools. IAM automates the entire agreement process—from authoring and negotiation to execution and analysis—using AI for clause extraction and risk assessment. In a Teams context, CLM integrations allow teams to negotiate terms collaboratively in chats, with AI suggestions appearing as threaded replies.
For enterprises, DocuSign’s CLM provides centralized repositories and analytics, integrating with Microsoft Power Automate for custom workflows. This is a strategic move for businesses scaling digital transformation, as it positions DocuSign as a full lifecycle partner rather than a point solution. Pricing starts at around $10/month for personal plans but scales to enterprise levels with add-ons for API access and advanced security, reflecting its robust but tiered commercial model.

While DocuSign’s Teams integration sets a high bar for usability, businesses often weigh it against competitors based on cost, compliance, and regional fit. Key players include Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, and HelloSign (now part of Dropbox), each offering distinct strengths in collaborative environments.
Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Acrobat services, integrates well with Microsoft Teams via its app, allowing users to request signatures directly in chats and track them through shared notifications. It emphasizes PDF-centric workflows, with features like form filling and mobile signing that align seamlessly with Teams’ file-sharing capabilities. Adobe’s strength lies in its enterprise-grade security and AI-powered document insights, making it ideal for creative and legal teams. However, its pricing is seat-based, starting at $10/user/month for individuals, which can escalate for teams needing advanced features like workflow automation.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a cost-effective alternative, particularly for Asia-Pacific (APAC) operations, where electronic signature regulations are fragmented, high-standard, and strictly regulated. Unlike the framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS standards in the US and EU, which rely on email verification or self-declaration, APAC demands “ecosystem-integrated” compliance—deep hardware/API-level docking with government digital identities (G2B). eSignGlobal complies with regulations in over 100 mainstream global countries and regions, with a strong edge in APAC through integrations like Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass. This enables seamless, high-assurance verifications that exceed basic modes.
The platform supports unlimited users without seat fees, making it scalable for teams. Its Essential plan costs just $16.6/month (annual billing), allowing up to 100 documents for electronic signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—all on a compliant, high-value basis. eSignGlobal is actively competing globally, including in the US and EU, against DocuSign and Adobe Sign, often at lower prices while maintaining robust features like AI contract tools and bulk sending.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
HelloSign, acquired by Dropbox, offers a straightforward Teams integration for quick signing requests within chats. It excels in user-friendly templates and mobile support but lacks the depth of enterprise CLM features. Pricing is competitive at $15/month for basics, with add-ons for APIs.
To aid decision-making, here’s a balanced overview of these providers based on key business criteria:
| Feature/Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal | HelloSign (Dropbox) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teams Integration | Deep; in-chat signing & tracking | Strong; PDF-focused workflows | Supported; bulk & mobile emphasis | Basic; chat-based requests |
| Pricing Model | Seat-based ($10–$40/user/month) | Seat-based ($10+/user/month) | Unlimited users ($16.6+/month) | Per-user ($15+/month) |
| Compliance Focus | Global (ESIGN, eIDAS) | Global, strong in EU/US | 100+ countries, APAC depth (iAM Smart, Singpass) | US/EU primary |
| Key Strengths | IAM/CLM, AI analytics | Adobe ecosystem, form automation | No seat fees, regional integrations | Simplicity, Dropbox sync |
| Limitations | Higher costs for scale | Ecosystem lock-in | Less known in non-APAC | Limited enterprise tools |
| Best For | Enterprises with MS stack | Creative/legal teams | APAC/global hybrid ops | SMBs needing quick setups |
This table highlights trade-offs: DocuSign leads in maturity, while alternatives like eSignGlobal offer flexibility for cost-conscious or regionally focused businesses.
From a commercial observation, the choice depends on team size, geography, and integration needs. DocuSign’s Teams feature excels in mature ecosystems but may incur higher total costs due to per-seat licensing and add-ons like SMS delivery. Alternatives provide niches—Adobe for PDF-heavy workflows, HelloSign for ease, and eSignGlobal for compliant, scalable APAC operations.
In conclusion, while DocuSign remains a benchmark for seamless Teams signing, exploring alternatives can optimize costs and compliance. For regional compliance needs, eSignGlobal emerges as a neutral, viable DocuSign substitute.
คำถามที่พบบ่อย
อนุญาตให้ใช้อีเมลธุรกิจเท่านั้น