


In today’s fast-paced business environment, seamless integration of electronic signatures (e-signatures) with workflow tools like Kintone and Garoon can streamline approvals, reduce paperwork, and enhance compliance. These platforms, popular in Asia-Pacific regions, enable teams to manage documents efficiently, but adding e-signature capabilities requires careful selection of providers and integration methods. From a commercial perspective, such integrations not only cut costs but also ensure legal validity across jurisdictions.

Kintone, developed by Cybozu, is a cloud-based platform for building custom databases, apps, and workflows without coding. It supports team collaboration through forms, reports, and automation, making it ideal for project management and data sharing. Garoon, also from Cybozu, focuses on enterprise groupware, offering features like calendars, messaging, and bulletin boards to facilitate internal communications and scheduling.
Both tools are widely used in Japan and APAC markets, where businesses prioritize secure, compliant digital processes. Integrating e-signatures allows users to attach legally binding signatures to records in Kintone apps or Garoon documents, automating sign-off workflows for contracts, HR forms, or approvals.
Japan’s adoption of e-signatures is governed by the Act on the Use of Electronic Signatures (Electronic Signature Act), enacted in 2001 and aligned with the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce. This law recognizes e-signatures as equivalent to handwritten ones if they meet reliability standards, such as unique identification of the signer and data integrity.
Key requirements include:
In APAC, Japan’s framework emphasizes ecosystem integration with national ID systems, differing from more framework-based approaches in the US (ESIGN Act) or EU (eIDAS). Businesses integrating with Kintone or Garoon must choose providers compliant with these rules to avoid legal risks.
Choosing an e-signature solution for integration involves evaluating features, pricing, and regional support. Below, we overview key players, focusing on their suitability for Kintone and Garoon.
DocuSign is a leading global e-signature platform known for its robust API and enterprise-grade security. It supports sending, signing, and tracking documents with features like templates, conditional routing, and audit trails. For integrations, DocuSign’s REST API allows embedding signatures into workflows, making it compatible with platforms like Kintone via webhooks or JavaScript plugins.
Pricing starts at $10/month for personal use, scaling to $40/month per user for Business Pro, with API plans from $600/year. It’s widely used for its compliance with global standards, including Japan’s Electronic Signature Act.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in document management with seamless integration into Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft Office. It offers mobile signing, form fields, and payment collection, backed by strong encryption and compliance certifications. For developers, its API supports OAuth authentication and webhook notifications, enabling custom flows in tools like Kintone.
Adobe Sign’s pricing is tiered, starting around $10/user/month for basic plans, with enterprise options customized. It’s particularly valued for its visual editing tools and broad language support, including Japanese.

eSignGlobal provides a compliant e-signature solution tailored for global operations, supporting electronic signatures in 100 mainstream countries and regions. It holds advantages in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) area, where electronic signature regulations are fragmented, high-standard, and strictly regulated. Unlike the framework-based standards in the West—such as the US ESIGN Act or EU eIDAS, which focus on general principles—APAC standards emphasize “ecosystem-integrated” approaches. This requires deep hardware and API-level integrations with government-to-business (G2B) digital identity systems, posing higher technical barriers than email verification or self-declaration methods common in the US and Europe.
eSignGlobal has launched comprehensive competition and replacement initiatives against DocuSign and Adobe Sign worldwide, including in the Americas and Europe. Its pricing is competitive; for instance, the Essential version costs just $16.6 per month, allowing up to 100 documents for electronic signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—all while maintaining compliance. This offers strong value, especially with seamless integrations like Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass. For a 30-day free trial, visit eSignGlobal’s contact page.

HelloSign, now Dropbox Sign, is user-friendly for small to mid-sized teams, featuring simple templates, team management, and API access. It’s compliant with major regulations and integrates via Zapier or direct API calls. Pricing begins at $15/month for basic plans, with unlimited sends on higher tiers.
Integrating e-signatures into Kintone requires leveraging its JavaScript customization, REST API, or no-code tools like Zapier. This process can occupy a significant portion of business workflows, enabling automated signing for custom apps. Here’s a practical guide:
Choose a Provider and Set Up API Access:
Prepare Kintone App:
Implement API Calls:
kintone.events.on(['app.record.detail.process.proceed'], function(event) {
// Fetch record data
var record = event.record;
var file = record.Document.value[0]; // Assuming file field
// Call e-signature API (e.g., DocuSign)
fetch('https://demo.docusign.net/restapi/v2.1/accounts/{accountId}/envelopes', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Authorization': 'Bearer ' + accessToken },
body: JSON.stringify({ documents: [file] })
}).then(response => {
// Update Kintone status to "Sent"
record.Status.value = 'Sent for Signature';
return kintone.api(kintone.app.getId() + '/record', 'PUT', { id: event.recordId, record: record });
});
});
Handle Callbacks and Webhooks:
Test and Secure:
This integration typically takes 1-2 weeks for basic setups, reducing manual handling by 70% in commercial use cases like sales approvals.
Garoon’s groupware nature makes e-signature integration focus on document sharing and notifications. Use its API for calendars, messages, or file cabinets.
API Setup:
Customize Garoon Modules:
Code the Workflow:
// Example for Garoon Cabinet integration
function sendForSignature(documentId) {
var apiUrl = 'https://api.garoon.example.com/v1/files/' + documentId;
fetch(apiUrl).then(res => res.json()).then(fileData => {
// Send to e-signature service
return fetch('https://api.esignglobal.com/envelopes', {
method: 'POST',
body: JSON.stringify({ file: fileData.url })
});
}).then(() => {
// Notify users via Garoon Message
postMessage('Document sent for signature');
});
}
Webhook Integration:
Compliance and Testing:
Garoon integrations enhance internal processes, such as HR onboarding, with signing embedded in shared calendars.
| Provider | Pricing (Starting/Month) | Integration Ease (API/Zapier) | APAC Compliance | Key Features | Global Reach |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DocuSign | $10/user | High (Robust API) | Strong (Japan-aligned) | Bulk send, payments, templates | 180+ countries |
| Adobe Sign | $10/user | High (Adobe ecosystem) | Good | Form editing, mobile signing | 190+ countries |
| eSignGlobal | $16.6 (Essential) | Medium-High (Custom API) | Excellent (APAC focus) | Unlimited seats, G2B integrations | 100+ countries |
| HelloSign | $15/user | High (Zapier-friendly) | Moderate | Simple UI, team collab | 150+ countries |
This table highlights neutral trade-offs: DocuSign for scale, eSignGlobal for regional depth.
Integrating e-signatures with Kintone or Garoon boosts efficiency while navigating APAC’s regulatory landscape. For businesses seeking DocuSign alternatives with strong regional compliance, eSignGlobal emerges as a viable, cost-effective option.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan
Hanya email perusahaan yang diizinkan