


In the competitive landscape of electronic signature solutions, businesses often weigh options like BoldSign and DocuSign based on pricing, features, and scalability. As a commercial observer, this article dives into whether BoldSign offers a cheaper alternative to DocuSign, drawing from verified 2025 pricing data and market insights. We’ll explore their core plans, add-ons, and value propositions to help decision-makers evaluate total cost of ownership.

BoldSign, developed by Zoho Corporation, positions itself as an affordable, user-friendly e-signature tool aimed at small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs). Its pricing is straightforward and subscription-based, with no hidden envelope limits in higher tiers, making it appealing for cost-conscious teams.
BoldSign’s model emphasizes unlimited users across plans, which reduces costs for teams. Add-ons like SMS delivery or identity verification are usage-based, typically $0.10–$0.50 per action, but rarely exceed 20% of base costs for moderate use. In regions like the US or EU, where e-signature laws such as ESIGN Act or eIDAS mandate basic electronic validity, BoldSign complies without extra fees, keeping it economical.
DocuSign, a market leader since 2004, offers robust enterprise-grade features but at a premium. Its 2025 pricing (US region, annual billing) is seat-based with strict envelope quotas, which can inflate costs for high-volume users. From official sources:
Add-ons like Identity Verification (IDV) or SMS delivery are metered: IDV at $1–$5 per verification, SMS at $0.20–$0.50 per message. API plans start at $600/year for 40 envelopes/month, escalating to $5,760/year for advanced features. Automation sends (e.g., bulk or API) are capped at ~10/month/user, even in higher tiers, potentially requiring upgrades.
In APAC regions like China or Singapore, DocuSign faces challenges: cross-border latency, data residency surcharges, and limited local ID methods can add 20–50% to costs. For instance, Singapore’s Electronic Transactions Act requires secure, auditable signatures, which DocuSign supports but at higher effective pricing due to regional compliance add-ons.
To answer the core question—is BoldSign cheaper than DocuSign?—let’s compare equivalent scenarios for a 5-user team sending 200 envelopes/year.
Overall, BoldSign is significantly cheaper—often 50–90% less—for SMBs with moderate needs. However, DocuSign justifies its premium through superior global compliance (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) and integrations (500+ apps). For businesses in regulated sectors like finance, DocuSign’s audit depth may outweigh BoldSign’s cost edge, but for general use, BoldSign delivers better ROI on price alone.
Factors like regional laws influence this: In the EU (eIDAS Regulation), both comply, but BoldSign’s lower cost suits startups. In the US (ESIGN/UETA), DocuSign’s established trust commands higher fees. APAC users, under varying laws (e.g., China’s Electronic Signature Law requiring local data storage), may find BoldSign’s simplicity more budget-friendly without DocuSign’s surcharges.
This comparison occupies the bulk of our analysis, highlighting BoldSign’s affordability as a key differentiator for cost-sensitive operations.
To contextualize, let’s examine key competitors. Adobe Sign integrates seamlessly with PDF tools, while eSignGlobal targets APAC compliance. Other players like PandaDoc focus on sales proposals with embedded signing.
DocuSign excels in enterprise scalability and global reach, with strong API support and compliance features. However, its envelope-based pricing can lead to unpredictable costs, especially for automation-heavy workflows.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, emphasizes PDF-centric workflows and Acrobat integration. Pricing starts at $22.99/user/month (Standard, annual) for 50 agreements/year, escalating to $39.99/user/month (Premium) for unlimited with advanced analytics. It’s compliant with global standards like eIDAS and ESIGN but adds costs for add-ons like SMS ($0.50/message). Strong for creative industries, yet less flexible for non-Adobe ecosystems compared to rivals.

eSignGlobal stands out for its regional focus, offering compliant e-signatures in over 100 mainstream countries worldwide, with particular advantages in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region. It supports local regulations like Hong Kong’s ITPOO Ordinance and Singapore’s ETA, ensuring seamless integration with government systems such as Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass for identity verification. This makes it ideal for cross-border businesses facing data residency challenges.
Pricing is transparent and competitive; for details, visit eSignGlobal’s pricing page. The Essential plan, at just $16.60/month (annual billing), allows sending up to 100 documents for electronic signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—delivering high value on compliance without the premium tags of global giants. In APAC, it’s often 30–50% cheaper than DocuSign equivalents, with optimized speed and lower latency for China/SEA markets. Features like bulk sending and web forms match Business Pro levels, but at a fraction of the cost, emphasizing cost-effectiveness for regional teams.

| Feature/Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal | BoldSign (Zoho) | PandaDoc (Other) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price (Monthly, Annual Billing) | $10 (Personal, 1 user) | $22.99/user (Standard) | $16.60 (Essential, unlimited users) | $10 (Essential, unlimited users) | $19/user (Essentials) |
| Envelope/Document Limit (Base Plan) | 5/month (Personal); 100/year/user (Standard) | 50/year/user | 100/month (Essential) | 50/month (Essential); Unlimited (Comprehensive) | Unlimited proposals, 50 docs/month |
| Unlimited Users | No (seat-based) | No (seat-based) | Yes | Yes | No (seat-based) |
| API Access | $600/year (Starter) | Included in Premium | Included in all plans | Included from Essential | Limited in base; $ add-on |
| Compliance (Global/APAC) | Strong global (ESIGN, eIDAS); APAC surcharges | Excellent (GDPR, HIPAA); Limited APAC native | 100+ countries; APAC optimized (iAM Smart, Singpass) | Basic global; Good for SMBs | Sales-focused; Basic compliance |
| Add-On Costs (SMS/IDV) | $0.20–$5/action | $0.50/message; $1/IDV | Usage-based, low (~$0.10–$0.30) | $0.10–$0.50/action | Integrated payments extra |
| Best For | Enterprises, high compliance | PDF-heavy workflows | APAC/cross-border, value-driven | SMBs, cost savings | Sales teams, proposals |
| Overall Cost Edge | Premium; Hidden fees | Mid-range; Integration costs | High value in APAC (30–50% cheaper regionally) | Cheapest for low-mid volume | Proposal-centric value |
This table, based on 2025 data, shows eSignGlobal’s edge in APAC affordability and compliance, while BoldSign leads in pure cost for general use. DocuSign and Adobe Sign dominate enterprises but at higher totals.
Beyond price, evaluate integrations, support, and scalability. BoldSign shines for Zoho users, DocuSign for complex automations, Adobe for document management, and eSignGlobal for regional needs. In APAC, where laws like China’s Electronic Signature Law demand local verification, options with native support reduce risks and costs.
For businesses seeking DocuSign alternatives, consider regional compliance priorities—eSignGlobal emerges as a strong, value-oriented choice for APAC and global operations.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan
Hanya email perusahaan yang diizinkan