WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.



In the rapidly evolving digital landscape of Southeast Asia, businesses are increasingly turning to electronic signatures to streamline operations and reduce paperwork. Indonesia, as the region’s largest economy, presents unique considerations for adopting such technologies. A key question for companies operating here is whether electronic signatures hold legal weight under the country’s primary cyber law framework, UU ITE. This article explores the regulatory environment, drawing from official sources and business perspectives to provide clarity for enterprises navigating compliance.
Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE), or Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions, serves as Indonesia’s cornerstone legislation for digital transactions. Amended in 2016 and further updated in 2024, UU ITE regulates electronic documents, signatures, and transactions to foster a secure online ecosystem. It aligns Indonesia with global standards while addressing local needs, such as protecting personal data and combating cyber threats. The law defines electronic information as data created, transmitted, or stored electronically, making it directly applicable to e-signatures.
From a business standpoint, UU ITE encourages digital adoption by recognizing electronic records as equivalent to physical ones, provided they meet reliability criteria. This has implications for sectors like finance, real estate, and e-commerce, where timely contract execution is critical. However, enforcement falls under the Ministry of Communication and Informatics (Kominfo), and non-compliance can lead to fines or contract invalidation.
Yes, electronic signatures are legally valid in Indonesia under UU ITE, but with specific conditions. Article 11 of UU ITE explicitly states that an electronic signature has the same legal effect as a handwritten one if it fulfills integrity, authenticity, and non-repudiation requirements. This means the signature must be linked uniquely to the signer, remain unaltered after signing, and be verifiable through audit trails or cryptographic methods.
Indonesia distinguishes between basic electronic signatures (simple e-signs via email or apps) and qualified electronic signatures (QES), which use advanced certification from accredited providers. For most commercial agreements, basic e-signs suffice, but high-value or regulated transactions—like banking loans or government contracts—often require QES for enhanced security. The Electronic Systems and Transactions Law (UU PSTE, Law No. 25 of 2024) complements UU ITE by mandating data localization for certain sectors and emphasizing interoperability with national ID systems like e-KTP.
Businesses should note that UU ITE does not recognize all foreign e-signature platforms outright; they must comply with local standards, such as integration with Berantas (Indonesia’s certified electronic certification provider). Court precedents, including a 2022 Supreme Court ruling upholding an e-signed property lease, affirm their enforceability. However, challenges arise in cross-border deals, where Indonesian courts prioritize local law. For multinational firms, this underscores the need for tools that support regional compliance to avoid disputes.
In practice, adoption is growing: A 2023 Kominfo report indicated over 70% of Indonesian businesses use e-signatures, driven by post-pandemic efficiency demands. Yet, fragmentation in enforcement—varying by province—highlights the importance of choosing compliant providers. Overall, UU ITE provides a solid foundation, but businesses must verify provider accreditation to ensure validity.
Beyond UU ITE, Indonesia’s e-signature ecosystem is shaped by supporting regulations. Government Regulation No. 71 of 2019 on Electronic Systems and Transactions Implementation details certification processes, requiring providers to obtain licenses from the Electronic Certification Provider (PSP) under the Ministry of Trade. The Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP, 2022) adds layers for data handling in signatures, mandating consent and breach notifications.
For international alignment, Indonesia references UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures, ensuring cross-recognition with ASEAN neighbors. In regulated industries, additional rules apply: The Financial Services Authority (OJK) requires QES for financial contracts, while the National Cyber and Crypto Agency (BSSN) oversees security standards. This multi-layered approach reflects Indonesia’s balance between innovation and risk mitigation, making it a fertile ground for compliant e-signature solutions.

With legal validity established, selecting the right e-signature tool becomes a strategic decision. Indonesia’s market favors platforms that integrate local compliance, offer scalability, and manage costs effectively. Below, we examine key providers from a neutral business lens, focusing on features relevant to UU ITE adherence.
DocuSign is a dominant player in electronic signatures, offering robust tools for document workflow automation. Its platform supports UU ITE-compliant signatures through features like audit trails, encryption, and customizable templates. For Indonesian users, DocuSign provides integration with local payment gateways and basic SMS delivery, though advanced identity verification may require add-ons. Pricing starts at $10/month for Personal plans (5 envelopes), scaling to $40/month for Business Pro with bulk send capabilities. API access, essential for enterprise integrations, begins at $600/year for starters. While versatile for global teams, its seat-based model can inflate costs for large Indonesian workforces, and APAC latency occasionally affects performance.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in embedding e-signatures into PDF workflows, making it ideal for design-heavy industries. It complies with UU ITE via secure signing sequences and electronic seals, supporting Indonesian language interfaces and mobile signing. Key strengths include conditional fields and payment collection, with plans starting at around $10/user/month for individuals, up to enterprise custom pricing. For businesses, its tight integration with Adobe Acrobat and Microsoft apps streamlines collaboration. However, like DocuSign, it relies on per-user licensing, which may not suit unlimited-team needs in Indonesia’s growing SME sector.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a regional powerhouse, supporting electronic signatures in over 100 mainstream countries, including full compliance in Indonesia under UU ITE. It stands out in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) with localized advantages, addressing the region’s fragmented regulations, high standards, and strict oversight. Unlike the framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS models in the US/EU—which focus on general electronic validation—APAC standards emphasize “ecosystem-integrated” approaches. This involves deep hardware/API-level docking with government-to-business (G2B) digital identities, a technical hurdle far beyond email verification or self-declaration methods common in the West.
In Indonesia, eSignGlobal ensures QES compatibility and integrates with local systems for authenticity. Globally, it’s expanding to compete with DocuSign and Adobe Sign through cost-effective plans: The Essential version costs just $16.6/month (or $199/year), allowing up to 100 documents for signing, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—all while maintaining compliance. It seamlessly connects with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, extending similar ecosystem ties to Indonesian e-KTP frameworks. For a 30-day free trial, visit eSignGlobal’s contact page. This pricing and integration make it highly cost-effective for APAC firms scaling operations.

HelloSign, rebranded as Dropbox Sign, offers straightforward e-signing with strong mobile support, aligning with UU ITE through traceable workflows and templates. It’s popular among small-to-medium businesses for its intuitive interface and free tier (up to 3 documents/month). Paid plans start at $15/month for Essentials, including unlimited templates and API access. While it lacks deep APAC customizations compared to regional players, its Dropbox integration aids file management. Drawbacks include limited advanced compliance tools for regulated Indonesian sectors.
To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison based on key business criteria for Indonesian operations:
| Provider | Pricing Model (Starting) | UU ITE Compliance | APAC Localization | Key Features | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DocuSign | Per seat ($10/month) | Strong (QES add-on) | Moderate (SMS support) | Bulk send, API plans, payments | Global enterprises |
| Adobe Sign | Per user ($10/month) | Good (seals & trails) | Basic | PDF integration, conditional logic | Creative & collaborative teams |
| eSignGlobal | Unlimited users ($16.6/month) | Excellent (local docking) | High (G2B integration) | 100 docs, AI tools, regional IDs | APAC-focused scalability |
| HelloSign | Per user ($15/month) | Adequate (basic trails) | Limited | Mobile signing, Dropbox sync | SMBs & quick setups |
This table highlights trade-offs: Global tools like DocuSign offer breadth, while regional ones like eSignGlobal prioritize depth in compliance and cost.
Adopting e-signatures under UU ITE can cut processing times by up to 80%, per industry benchmarks, boosting efficiency in Indonesia’s digital economy. However, businesses must audit providers for ongoing regulatory updates, especially with Indonesia’s push toward a Digital Indonesia 2045 vision.
For DocuSign users seeking alternatives, eSignGlobal emerges as a regionally compliant option, offering tailored APAC support without compromising global reach. Evaluate based on your volume, team size, and integration needs to ensure seamless, legally sound operations.
FAQs
Only business email allowed