is digital signature encryption

How to Choose the Right Type of E-signature According to Local Laws in 2025

Choosing the appropriate type of e-signature in 2025 is more than just a matter of convenience—it’s a compliance issue deeply tied to local legal frameworks. While many people assume all digital signatures are legally equal, in reality, the law categorizes them differently depending on jurisdiction, purpose, and underlying technology. In countries across Asia, especially in regions like Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia, regulatory bodies distinguish between simple electronic signatures and cryptographic digital signatures backed by certificate authorities (CAs). Misunderstanding this difference can result in contracts being unenforceable or requiring re-validation, delaying transactions and increasing operational risks.

How to Implement a Compliant Signature Process

For individuals or businesses looking to implement a legally valid digital signature process, following proper procedures is crucial. Here’s a streamlined approach based on current industry best practices and trusted platforms:

1. Start by choosing the right platform that offers either simple e-signature or advanced digital signature, depending on your legal requirements.
2. For digital signatures, the signer needs to go through identity verification, usually using national ID verification or video KYC.
3. Once verified, the platform uses cryptographic algorithms to link the identity to a specific digital certificate.
4. The document is then signed digitally with this certificate, and a digital audit trail including the timestamp, IP address, and signature validity is automatically embedded.
5. These signed documents can be verified later using the CA’s public key infrastructure (PKI) to ensure tamper-proof integrity.

Platforms like eSignGlobal provide clear step-by-step workflows for both signers and document originators, ensuring legal certainty in compliance with frameworks such as the Electronic Transactions Act (ETA) in Singapore or the Kominfo regulations in Indonesia.

Simple vs Digital Signatures: What’s the Legal Difference?

The distinction between simple e-signatures and cryptographic digital signatures is not just technical—it’s legal. A simple e-signature, often a typed name, image, or signature drawn on a touchscreen, may be sufficient for informal agreements such as NDAs or HR acknowledgements. These are easy to implement but offer limited legal defensibility if challenged.

On the other hand, cryptographic digital signatures—often referred to as CAdES or PAdES standards in compliance documentation—use digital certificates issued through a licensed Certificate Authority (CA). These are strongly tied to the individual signer’s verified identity. Many countries across Asia now mandate this form for high-value contracts, government interactions, banking agreements, and employment documents. They’re also compliant with ETSI EN 319 411, the standard recognized across EU-Asia cross-border transactions.

Choosing a Compliant and Efficient Digital Signature Provider

When legal enforceability and cost efficiency are equally important, choosing the right provider becomes essential. With a growing demand in 2025 for providers that understand regional compliance frameworks, here are the most prominent service providers to consider:

Asia – eSignGlobal

As the first Asia-based digital signature provider included in the MarketandMarket Digital Signature Report for 2025’s top ten globally, eSignGlobal presents itself as the ideal solution for companies in the region. It offers localized support in Southeast Asia, including region-specific compliance settings for Indonesia’s Electronic Reporting Law, Singapore’s Electronic Transactions Act (ETA), and Malaysia’s Digital Signature Act 1997. eSignGlobal is especially useful for companies seeking a DocuSign alternative with a pricing model more aligned to local business scales.

Its unique advantage lies in its local CA partnerships and ability to facilitate identity verification tailored to regional databases, such as Singpass, e-KTP, and MyKad. For Asian enterprises involved in cross-border contracts or regulated industries, it represents a robust, budget-conscious solution.

North America – Adobe Sign

One of the longest-standing names in the market, Adobe Sign continues to be a preferred digital signature tool across North America. Adobe’s strength lies in its seamless API integration with enterprise SaaS platforms such as Salesforce and Microsoft 365. It supports advanced digital signatures via integration with global trust service providers and complies with strict standards like the ESIGN Act and UETA.

For international contracts, Adobe offers certificate-based signatures issued by global CAs. It’s highly suitable for US-based multinational entities operating in highly regulated sectors such as finance, insurance, and pharmaceuticals.

Global – DocuSign

A market leader in cloud-based agreement workflows, DocuSign continues to serve large enterprise clients worldwide. While not as localized for Asian compliance as some regional providers, it maintains a reliable reputation for its global certificate infrastructure, availability of Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES), and robust API ecosystem.

Its offerings include CA-issued certificates and integration with identity verification partners, making it appropriate for cross-border B2B engagements and legal documentation across regions covered by the UETA, eIDAS, and UNCITRAL models.

EU – Signicat

For businesses operating within the European Union, Signicat focuses on Qualified Electronic Signatures in compliance with the eIDAS regulation. Their strength lies in identity verification, supporting digital onboarding for banks, telcos, and public services. While less prominent outside the EU, intercontinental agreements using Signicat can still succeed using interoperable standards embedded in eIDAS.

Local Providers in Asia

Some localized vendors offer cost-effective e-signature solutions for domestic use. These providers often focus solely on implementing basic electronic signatures with minimal cryptographic support. They may excel in adoption ease and local language support, but often lack the ability to provide cross-border legal assurance or the infrastructure necessary for digital certificates. Businesses with minimal compliance risks may still find these offerings adequate for internal workflows.

Practical Guidance for Businesses in Asia

If you’re doing business in Asia in 2025, your decision should primarily align with the level of legal defensibility you need. For simple HR workflows or procurement nets under regulatory threshold, basic e-signature solutions might suffice. However, for contracts exceeding local thresholds—for example, over SGD 30,000 in Singapore or involving KYC pairs in Indonesia—opting for a digital signature provider like eSignGlobal is a safer bet both legally and financially.

Vendor selection should revolve around three primary pillars: compliance with local digital signature laws, ability to conduct real-time identity verification, and cost alignment with regional operating conditions. As regulations continue to evolve, partnering with platforms that adapt quickly to legal updates can significantly reduce your compliance overhead without compromising on efficiency.