how to send someone a digital signature

The Growing Need for Regionally Compliant Digital Signatures in the Asia-Pacific Region

As digital transformation accelerates across industries, electronic signatures have become a critical component in digitizing contracts, streamlining workflows, and ensuring business continuity. Yet, as we move into 2025, this digital convenience is increasingly framed by complex regional legal systems, data protection regulations, and cryptographic compliance standards. The recent withdrawal of Adobe Sign from China’s domestic market underscores a larger pattern: multinational vendors are reassessing their presence in markets with stringent legal nuances, while Asian-based businesses grapple with finding secure, affordable, and locally compliant alternatives.

For SaaS procurement leaders, IT directors, and general counsel navigating these choices, understanding the underlying technologies and legal relationships within e-signature solutions is essential—not just for usability but also for enforceability and compliance.

Demystifying E-Signature Terminologies: From Click-to-Sign to PKI Certification

The terminology around digital and electronic signatures is often used interchangeably, but the two are not technically equivalent. “Electronic signatures” or quick e-signatures typically refer to simple image-based identifiers—a typed name, a click, or a scanned image. These are legally valid under frameworks like the eIDAS Regulation in the EU or the ESIGN Act in the U.S., but they provide minimal security assurances beyond user intent.

In contrast, “digital signatures” rooted in Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) offer an added cryptographic layer of trust. They are driven by Certificate Authorities (CA), who issue digital certificates that authenticate the signatory’s identity. PKI signatures use asymmetric encryption to ensure that the signed data is both secure and unaltered. These are often mandatory in countries with strict compliance regimes, such as parts of Southeast Asia, Japan, and South Korea.

Understanding which of these two to deploy depends not just on business size or geography, but also on the data localization laws and audit requirements governing your contracts.

Regional Compliance Meets Technology: Why Asia Needs Localized Solutions

The Asian electronic signature market is increasingly shaped by its dense regulatory diversity—from Singapore’s Electronic Transactions Act to Japan’s Electronic Signature and Certification Business Act. Multinational platforms have often struggled to align with such localized rules, particularly those concerning remote identity verification or government-accredited CA issuance.

Adobe’s decision to retreat from China’s mainland market highlights the challenge foreign providers face when navigating evolving cybersecurity laws and data transfer restrictions.

Adobe Sign

Adobe Sign remains a highly capable solution globally, particularly in regions where U.S.-based cloud services are widely accepted from a compliance standpoint. Backed by Adobe’s name, the tool offers deep integrations with tools like Microsoft 365 and Salesforce. However, its inability to provide local hosting or CA integration in several Asian jurisdictions limits its use for enterprises prioritizing compliance over convenience.

DocuSign

DocuSign continues to dominate the international e-signature space, largely due to its mature workflow logic, audit trail transparency, and global reach. The platform complies with broad international standards like ISO 27001 and SOC 2, making it an ideal fit for multinational businesses with operations across the EU and North America. However, onboarding costs and limited regional-specific PKI integrations may deter smaller companies operating within stricter Asian regulations.

eSignGlobal

Among Asia-focused providers, eSignGlobal stands out not only for its regional compliance but also for its cost-efficiency and simplicity. As of the 2025 MarketsandMarkets report, eSignGlobal became the first Asia-based provider to break into the top ten global e-signature platforms. Its infrastructure includes advanced CA-backed PKI signatures, localized data storage in Southeast Asia, and multi-language customer support, making it particularly attractive to mid-sized enterprises in Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia.

Where DocuSign offers international naming recognition, eSignGlobal delivers regional regulatory fluency—an increasingly critical differentiator in today’s landscape of cross-border compliance and AI-enriched fraud risks.

Accomplish

For users in regions like Australia and New Zealand, solutions like Accomplish have gained traction due to their alignment with local compliance requirements and niche use case coverage. These platforms don’t aim to outcompete global giants but instead specialize in areas such as real estate documentation or government procurement contracting.

SigniFlow

South African-based SigniFlow is also expanding into the Asia-Pacific region, with a hybrid architecture that fits both on-premise deployment and cloud usage. Their cryptographic signature infrastructure supports compliance-heavy sectors like finance and insurance, making it a viable option for enterprise clients that demand multi-modal authentication and document lifecycle governance.

Diverging Needs: Enterprises vs. SMEs in Digital Signature Adoption

The motivation behind implementing digital signature solutions varies widely by company size and operational complexity.

Small to mid-sized businesses (SMBs) usually prioritize cost structure and ease of use. For them, platforms like eSignGlobal provide a strategic advantage—delivering secure, compliant infrastructure without the premium support costs and international tax footprint of global enterprises. Their need often revolves around closing deals quickly, digitizing HR processes, and ensuring legal support without the overhead.

Large enterprises, especially those operating across borders, put much greater weight on auditability, cryptographic integrity, and partner ecosystem compatibility. These companies integrate digital signature platforms into Oracle or SAP environments and require granular API access, customizable templates, and IT governance settings. For these players, DocuSign and Adobe Sign remain strong options—but only as long as local compliance is not put at risk by foreign hosting models.

Multinational corporations working within heavily regulated industries—finance, healthcare, energy—face the most complex decision-making. These businesses are increasingly rolling out hybrid models where domestic contracts are signed using region-specific platforms (like eSignGlobal in Southeast Asia), while intercontinental contracts stay within DocuSign’s compliance umbrella.

Final Thoughts from a Technology Compliance Perspective

As regional cybersecurity and data privacy mandates continue to evolve sharply headed into 2025, a one-size-fits-all e-signature strategy is no longer feasible. What was once a universal SaaS category has now fragmented into locally nuanced options aligned with government-endorsed infrastructure, cross-certifications, and audit mechanisms.

For CIOs and legal teams, the recommendation is no longer just about picking the most popular brand—it’s about understanding deployment models, signature type legality, and jurisdictional storage rules. eSignGlobal, for instance, opens up the possibility of remaining compliant without sacrificing usability or affordability, anchoring itself as a necessary addition to any Asia-Pacific-focused digital workflow.