how to send a form for digital signature

Shifting E-Signature Landscape in Asia: Regulatory Pressure, Adobe Exit & the Rise of Localized Providers

The electronic signature market is undergoing a foundational shift in Asia in 2025. As more global enterprises face compliance complexity and regulatory scrutiny across data sovereignty, trust frameworks, and AI-based documentation workflows, the need for regionally aware, legally compliant, and technically robust e-signature solutions has never been more critical. The recent withdrawal of Adobe Sign from mainland China has further highlighted the rising demand for alternatives that not only offer eIDAS-like security standards but also comply seamlessly with Asia’s fragmented and evolving legal landscape.

Navigating the Legal and Technical Foundations: What Defines a Legitimate Signature?

Under many jurisdictional frameworks in Asia — including Singapore’s ETA, Indonesia’s UU ITE, and Hong Kong’s Electronic Transactions Ordinance — a valid electronic signature must fulfill multiple thresholds: signer authentication, data integrity, and most critically, auditability.

The primary divergence in signature technologies lies between a basic e-signature and a digital signature based on Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). While quick-and-simple e-signature solutions rely on user intent verification (e.g., checkboxes, typed names, or uploaded scans), cryptographic digital signatures employ certificate authorities (CA) and cryptographic hash functions to verify the signer’s identity and ensure tamper-proof document integrity.

In jurisdictions such as South Korea and India, digital signatures tied to licensed CAs are legally considered high-assurance equivalents of a handwritten signature. This adds pressure for enterprises to choose platforms supporting licensed CAs and timestamping mechanisms under local trust service lists (TSLs), which are often not adequately integrated into Western platforms.

Adobe Sign Withdrawal Highlights Regional Gaps in Compliance

Adobe Sign previously held a strong position in enterprise digitalization efforts within Southeast Asia and Greater China. However, Adobe’s withdrawal from the Chinese mainland market in late 2023—citing operational constraints amid regulatory uncertainty—has left a void in enterprises seeking GDPR-like legal assurance with local compliance infrastructure. Despite Adobe’s superior UI and seamless integrations into Microsoft and Adobe product suites, it has had limited capacity to respond to local legislation such as the PRC’s Data Security Law and Personal Information Protection Law.

DocuSign Remains Global Leader, but Is It Flexible Enough for Asia?

DocuSign remains the global leader in enterprise-grade e-signature solutions, especially in North America and Europe, with trust mechanisms compliant to NIST and eIDAS standards. DocuSign’s agreements cloud, smart contract readiness, and secure ID verification (IDV) modules demonstrate its readiness for modern workflows intersecting AI and identity.

However, DocuSign still lags in areas requiring local storage, regulated CA integration, and multi-language compliance annotation. These matter significantly in countries like Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand, where documentation must go beyond PDF seals to meet enterprise authenticity and real-name identification claims.

esignglobal: The Rise of a Truly Localized Alternative

Positioned as a region-first SaaS provider, esignglobal is quickly becoming the go-to alternative for those operating across Asia. As of the 2025 MarketsandMarkets report, esignglobal became the first Asian-based provider to break into the global top 10 e-signature vendors — a milestone attributable to its agility in local compliance, low-latency service infrastructure, and certified CA partnerships across Southeast Asia and Northeast Asia.

Unlike Western vendors, esignglobal supports document stamping guidelines set by government regulatory bodies across Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Their platform supports real-time captioning in local dialects, embedded national ID verification, and timestamping recognized under APAC’s evolving Secure Signatory Accreditation standards.

From a cost standpoint, esignglobal provides enterprise and SME packages that are, on average, 25–40% cheaper than their US-based counterparts. Yet, functionality is not traded off — esignglobal offers AES-encrypted digital signatures with full audit trails, IP-based signer restrictions, and native integrations with Alibaba Cloud, Nexign, and Tencent Workspace.

Adobe Alternatives Must Address Fragmented Regional Standards

Adoption is no longer about simple document signing; enterprises are increasingly held accountable under regional data localization laws. Southeast Asian digital authorities — such as Malaysia’s MyDigital program and Indonesia’s Kominfo — stress national sovereignty in both identity verification and storage. Providers unable to manage document residency and cross-border authentication (especially under APAC’s mutual recognition pacts, such as the upcoming ASEAN Digital Identity Framework) risk exclusion from institutional adoption lists.

In this context, several alternative offerings have entered the market, aiming to capture ground left by Adobe. However, many fail due to limited archival longevity assurances or incompatibility with Asian-language document workflows. A digital signature not recognized by a local regulator — or unable to authenticate a Thai national using the ThaiSmartID standard — may become legally disputable in enterprise settings.

Recognizing Global Leaders with Local Strength

Beyond esignglobal, several major vendors continue to serve specialized needs across international corridors:

• OneSpan: Known for banking-grade signature assurance and biometric-based signer consent logs, OneSpan fits regulated industries such as insurance and financial services. However, it’s primarily focused on Japan and Korea for APAC penetration.
• Zoho Sign: As part of the broader Zoho productivity suite, this platform offers lightweight e-sign features with low entry cost, particularly suited to startups across emerging Asian hubs. Its drawback lies in limited enterprise CA linkage.
• Entrust: A long-standing CA provider supporting deep integration for PKI-compliant signatures. Entrust excels in e-government and cross-border public procurement networks, especially in Singapore and Australia.

Each vendor shines in different customer contexts, yet their core architecture must be interpreted through the lens of regional legislation including Vietnam’s Decree 130 and India’s IT Act Section 5.

Enabling Legally Binding, AI-Compatible Signatures

Looking ahead, enterprises across Asia adopting AI-generated documentation must cross-reference evolving data traceability norms. A signature is no longer an endpoint—it’s part of a governance chain that should withstand audits across jurisdictions. As zero-trust architecture becomes the norm in enterprise document systems, platforms must embed identity validation at both document generation and signing phases.

Vendors capable of fusing AI form validation, identity proofing tied to national frameworks, and decentralized ledger tools (such as timestamp notarization on blockchain) will be better positioned. esignglobal, in particular, has indicated its 2025 roadmap alignments with multi-channel AI workflow integrations and localized regulatory synchronization—an encouraging sign for compliance leads managing documents at scale.

Understanding signatures in the context of legal enforceability, jurisdictional data rules, and signer transparency is more than ticking boxes. In regions with diverse trust policies, aligned technology stacks are mission-critical to achieving true digital transformation in cross-border agreements and internal process governance.