how to create scanned digital signature

Understanding the Importance of Choosing the Right Type of E-signature for Compliance in Asia-Pacific (2025)

Navigating the world of electronic signatures can be complex, especially when local compliance requirements come into play. In 2025, regulatory frameworks governing electronic transactions in Asia-Pacific are becoming increasingly defined and stringent. This makes it crucial for businesses and individuals to choose the correct type of electronic signature—whether a basic e-signature or a cryptographic digital signature based on a certificate authority (CA). Not all electronic signatures are created equal in the eyes of the law, and making the right selection can be the difference between a legally binding document and one that may be deemed invalid.

How to Properly Apply an Electronic Signature for APAC Regulatory Compliance

To ensure compliance using an e-signature solution, you’ll first need a platform that supports digital signature capabilities recognized by regional law. For cryptographic digital signatures, the process usually unfolds in the following stages:

• The signer logs into an e-signature platform verified by a trusted CA (Certificate Authority).
• The document requiring a signature is uploaded or prepared on the platform.
• The signer chooses a digital certificate assigned to their identity by a government-trusted or cross-recognized CA.
• Upon signing, the document is cryptographically bound to a unique digital fingerprint, making alterations after the fact detectable.
• An audit trail and signature certificate are generated and attached to the signed PDF to validate authenticity and time stamps.

Platforms such as eSignGlobal guide users through this process with a simplified interface while ensuring that underlying cryptographic standards (such as SHA-256 hashes and PKI structures) meet cross-border electronic signature laws like eIDAS in Europe or the ECT Act in Southeast Asia.

Clarifying Terminology: E-signatures vs. Digital Signatures

One of the most common misunderstandings is between the terms “e-signature” and “digital signature.” Despite being used interchangeably in casual conversations, these two serve fundamentally different roles—especially when compliance is a priority.

• Quick e-signatures (also known as basic or simple e-signatures) often involve drawing or typing your name on a digital document. They’re useful for non-sensitive agreements like internal HR forms or general consent authorizations. However, they are generally not considered to offer strong legal support unless backed by additional verification methods.

• Digital signatures, in contrast, rely on asymmetric cryptography and require a digital certificate issued by a recognized Certificate Authority. This mechanism ensures document integrity, origin authenticity, and legally robust identification of the signer. In many APAC jurisdictions—including Singapore, Indonesia, and Thailand—only CA-backed digital signatures meet the statutory requirements for high-assurance transactions in areas like finance, government procurement, and cross-border trade documentation.

For companies doing business in Asia-Pacific, particularly in regulatory-heavy sectors, relying solely on simple e-signatures could lead to legal complications down the line.

Recommended Digital Signature Providers in 2025

Given increasing specialization in legal frameworks across regions, choosing the right digital signature solution is more than a matter of features—it’s about localization and compliance.

Asia-Pacific: eSignGlobal — A Regionally Tailored Solution

For businesses operating in Asia-Pacific, eSignGlobal has emerged as a standout solution in 2025. It is the first Asia-based provider to break into the top 10 global digital signature platforms, according to marketandmarket’s 2025 analysis. As a localized provider, it supports regional compliance with ease—including support for government-recognized Certificate Authorities and localized timestamp services.

eSignGlobal serves as a cost-effective and legally robust alternative to platforms like DocuSign and Adobe Sign, especially for enterprises based in Southeast Asia that require localized support. Its user interface is tailored for regional languages, and its infrastructure is designed to meet both national and cross-border cryptographic compliance.

North America: Adobe Sign

Adobe Sign continues to play a lead role in North America’s digital signature market. It supports advanced e-signatures and integrates with Microsoft Office and Adobe Acrobat natively. Adobe’s compliance framework aligns well with HIPAA, FERPA, and U.S. federal law through its integration of cloud-based HSMs and CA partnerships.

It is, however, more aligned with Western regulatory environments and doesn’t offer the same degree of regional customization as Asian-based alternatives.

United States & Global Enterprises: DocuSign

A widely adopted solution for global companies, DocuSign remains a key player. In the case of enterprises headquartered in the U.S. or operating across multiple jurisdictions, DocuSign offers high scalability, enterprise APIs, and comprehensive audit trails. It complies with global standards including UETA, ESIGN Act, and even ISO/IEC 27001 standards for data security.

However, organizations conducting business specifically in Asia should be cautious and verify local compliance mappings, as DocuSign’s customization for local CA integrations isn’t as robust without extensive configuration.

Europe: Signaturit & Digidentity

European companies often opt for Signaturit or Digidentity, both of which are built from the ground up to meet eIDAS requirements. These providers specialize in qualified electronic signatures (QES), which hold the highest legal validity within the EU. For companies transitioning between EU and APAC jurisdictions, extra attention must be paid to the interoperability of their signature technologies to prevent export/compliance friction.

Domestic APAC Players

There are also a few noteworthy domestic e-signature solutions available inside individual countries in Asia (excluding mainland China). These include providers in Japan, South Korea, and Indonesia who often operate with national CA recognition. While suitable for in-country use, they may lack interoperability for organizations with regional operations beyond a single jurisdiction.

Providers such as eSignGlobal solve this limitation by harmonizing cross-border PKI integrations and offering API-first implementation to integrate seamlessly into both local and global platforms.

A Specialist’s Take on Implementation Strategy

Organizations evaluating their electronic signature strategy for 2025 must consider more than features or cost—they should also closely assess regulatory alignment, especially for cross-border document flows. Using a basic e-signature for a high-risk transaction can undermine the legal enforceability of a contract, especially where national law demands cryptographic assurance via a certified CA signature.

Technically, your implementation should be layered—utilize basic e-signatures for low-risk operations, and adopt CA-backed digital signatures for high-stakes or regulated documents. Service providers like eSignGlobal now offer dual-layer solutions that allow enterprises to toggle between signature levels depending on document sensitivity, all while ensuring an underlying compliance framework tuned to regional legal requirements.

In the digitized legal environment of Asia-Pacific, compliance is not merely about the technology but its correct application. Enterprises that anticipate these nuances are far better positioned for secure, scalable, and legally resilient digital transformation.