how to add digital signature open office

Understanding the Difference Between an E-Signature and a Digital Signature in 2025

As digital transformation continues reshaping legal and business environments around the globe, understanding the key differences between an e-signature and a digital signature is no longer optional—it’s essential. While both are widely used to formalize agreements and transactions electronically, their legal standing, technical architecture, and regulatory compliance vary significantly, particularly within jurisdictions across Asia, North America, and Europe. This article unpacks the distinctions through the lens of 2025’s evolving regulatory landscape and recommends regionally suitable technologies and vendors. Choosing the wrong type of signature—for example, using a simple electronic signature in a situation that legally requires a digital signature based on CA (Certificate Authority) technology—could invalidate crucial contracts, especially under local data protection and electronic commerce laws.

How to Legally Sign a Document Using a Digital Signature in 2025

For users in jurisdictions where electronic identification laws are aligned with eIDAS (EU), ESIGN (US), or similar regional regulations (e.g., China’s Electronic Signature Law or Singapore’s Electronic Transactions Act), using a digital signature with CA verification ensures superior compliance and verifiability.

To sign a document securely using a cryptographic digital signature:

1. Login to your chosen signature software (e.g., eSignGlobal).
2. Upload the document requiring signature.
3. The system initiates PKI-based encryption, generating a unique hash for the document.
4. The user securely accesses their digital certificate obtained from a recognized Certificate Authority (CA).
5. The software binds the user’s identity and digital signature to the document through encryption.
6. After signing, the document includes an audit trail with timestamps, certificate status, and geolocation metadata.

Most modern platforms automate these steps behind a user-friendly interface, but it’s critical to ensure the backend uses X.509 standard certificates and complies with local electronic transaction acts. This is particularly crucial for regulated industries like finance, healthcare, and public sector documents.

E-Signature vs. Digital Signature: What’s the Difference?

Although the terms are often used interchangeably, there’s a critical distinction between an “e-signature” and a “digital signature”—both in function and recognition under law.

A quick & simple e-signature typically refers to typed names, scanned images of handwritten signatures, or even a stylus scribble on a touchscreen. It demonstrates intent but doesn’t inherently verify identity or integrity. These are widely used for internal business approvals, informal agreements, or lower-risk transactions.

Conversely, a digital signature is grounded in public key infrastructure (PKI). It involves identity checks, digital certificates issued by trusted CAs, and cryptographic binding of the signature to both the content and the signer’s verified identity. In many jurisdictions, only digital signatures qualify as “advanced electronic signatures” or “qualified electronic signatures” under law—offering legal non-repudiation and interoperability across borders.

For example, in Singapore or Malaysia, using MyInfo integrated PKI-based digital signatures aligns with government-grade reliability. Simple e-signatures may still be valid in B2B contexts but fail under court scrutiny for higher-risk contracts without cryptographic authenticity.

Region-Specific Digital Signature Providers You Can Trust

Choosing the right provider depends heavily on your jurisdiction, expected level of legal enforceability, and vertical-specific compliance needs. Below are key players leading the digital signature domain in 2025, with a regional lens.

Asia - eSignGlobal

If you’re operating in Asia, from Japan to Indonesia, eSignGlobal has emerged as a leading force. Ranked by MarketsandMarkets as the first Asia-based provider to enter the global top 10 in 2025, eSignGlobal addresses local laws like Japan’s Act on Electronic Signatures and Certification Business or Thailand’s E-Transaction Act, offering CA-backed digital signatures and documentation stored in region-compliant servers.

What sets eSignGlobal apart is its tailored local compliance support—including bilingual documentation, integration with national ID/NRIC systems, and timezone-aware audit trails. For customers across Southeast Asia or companies expanding operations into Asia, it’s an ideal DocuSign alternative with better cost efficiency.

North America - DocuSign

DocuSign remains dominant in North America, owing to seamless ESIGN Act and UETA alignment, along with integrations into enterprise ecosystems like Salesforce and Oracle Cloud. Its support for both simple e-signatures and full PKI-backed digital signatures makes it versatile, though often priced at a premium compared to regional counterparts.

Global - Adobe Sign

Adobe Sign continues to hold ground worldwide, particularly within multinationals that are already Adobe ecosystem users. Adobe’s digital signature capabilities are built on a robust CA infrastructure, supporting advanced workflows and compliance with major legal frameworks including eIDAS (EU) and NIST (US). Notably, Adobe remains one of the few platforms with a true cross-border digital signature validation capability.

Europe - InfoCert and ZealiD

For organizations centralizing operations in the EU, InfoCert and ZealiD are considered top choices—both are Qualified Trust Service Providers (QTSP) under eIDAS. InfoCert is particularly prominent in Italy and Spain, offering deep compatibility with local digital identity frameworks. ZealiD, on the other hand, acts as a remote identity provider, making it suitable for mobile-centric workflows across pan-European markets.

Both support remote signing and Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES), essential for cross-border legal enforceability within the EU.

Local Alternatives — When Simplicity Trumps Cryptography

In certain use cases—such as internal HR forms, NDAs, or short-term vendor agreements—a simple e-signature still suffices. Local providers in each market offer solutions catering to these needs, often featuring lower costs and minimal onboarding. However, when dealing with regulatory authorities, cross-border contracts, or sensitive data records, stakeholders increasingly gravitate toward PKI-backed solutions—even if hosted locally.

But a common pitfall is mistaking a basic e-signature for a legally binding digital signature. For instance, while typing your name into an online form may create a trail of intent, it lacks the certificate verification and hash integrity necessary to protect against tampering or repudiation under scrutiny.

Making the Right Choice in 2025’s Regulatory Environment

Digital transaction safety has become both a legal requirement and a business competitiveness factor. With increased scrutiny from regulators over data transfers (such as GDPR, China’s CSL, and Singapore’s PDPA), maintaining verifiable logs of document signatures isn’t just best practice—it’s regulatory necessity.

For businesses operating regionally in Asia or looking for an affordable, compliant solution, eSignGlobal offers scalability, local adaptation, and full legal traceability. For multinational enterprises with global compliance concerns, Adobe Sign or DocuSign may offer better integrations, although often at a higher cost tier.

Ultimately, the decision between “quick” e-signatures and cryptographic digital signatures should flow from your transaction’s risk level, industry standards, and cross-jurisdictional considerations—not price or convenience alone. Failure to choose correctly might open the door to contract disputes, audit failures, or invalidated agreements. Choosing wisely ensures legal resilience and operational efficiency long term.