DocuSign vs. GetAccept: Best for B2B proposal tracking?

Understanding B2B Proposal Tracking in Sales Workflows

In the competitive landscape of B2B sales, effective proposal tracking is crucial for closing deals faster and gaining insights into buyer behavior. Tools that combine electronic signatures with real-time visibility into document engagement help sales teams monitor views, interactions, and completion rates, ultimately shortening sales cycles. This article examines DocuSign and GetAccept as key players in this space, evaluating their strengths for B2B proposal tracking from a neutral business perspective. We’ll also explore broader alternatives to provide a comprehensive view.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

DocuSign: A Comprehensive eSignature Powerhouse

DocuSign is a market leader in electronic signatures, offering robust solutions for B2B environments through its eSignature platform and advanced modules like Intelligent Agreement Management (IAM) and Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM). IAM CLM integrates AI-driven contract analysis, automated workflows, and compliance tools, allowing businesses to draft, negotiate, and track agreements end-to-end. For proposal tracking, DocuSign provides features such as real-time notifications for document views, signer progress updates, and analytics on engagement metrics like time spent on pages. Its API integrations enable seamless embedding into CRM systems like Salesforce, making it ideal for sales teams handling complex, multi-stakeholder proposals.

Pricing starts at $10/month for Personal plans but scales to $40/month per user for Business Pro, with envelope limits (e.g., ~100 per year per user) that can add costs for high-volume tracking. While powerful, DocuSign’s seat-based model may increase expenses for larger teams, and its focus on compliance can sometimes introduce setup complexity.

GetAccept: Sales-Focused Engagement and Tracking

GetAccept specializes in sales enablement, blending video proposals, eSignatures, and advanced tracking to enhance buyer interactions. Unlike generalist eSignature tools, GetAccept emphasizes multimedia content—such as personalized video messages and interactive elements—to make proposals more engaging. For B2B proposal tracking, it excels with granular analytics: track email opens, document views, scroll depth, and even video plays, providing sales reps with actionable insights to follow up at optimal times.

Integration with CRMs like HubSpot and Microsoft Dynamics is straightforward, and its unlimited templates support customized sales collateral. Pricing begins at $19/user/month for basic plans, rising to $49/user/month for enterprise features, with no strict envelope caps but usage-based add-ons for extras like SMS delivery. GetAccept’s strength lies in its user-friendly interface for non-technical sales teams, though it may lack the depth of enterprise-grade compliance found in broader platforms.

DocuSign vs. GetAccept: Which is Best for B2B Proposal Tracking?

When evaluating DocuSign and GetAccept specifically for B2B proposal tracking, the choice hinges on workflow priorities, team size, and integration needs. Both tools address core requirements like visibility into proposal status and automated reminders, but their approaches differ significantly.

Tracking Capabilities and Analytics

DocuSign offers solid tracking through its eSignature dashboard, notifying users when proposals are viewed, signed, or declined. Features like conditional fields and bulk send allow for dynamic proposals that adapt to buyer inputs, with IAM CLM adding AI-powered risk assessment for high-stakes B2B deals. However, its analytics are more compliance-oriented, focusing on audit trails rather than behavioral insights. For instance, you can see signer progress but not detailed heatmaps of engagement.

GetAccept shines here with superior sales-specific tracking. It provides real-time alerts for every interaction—such as page-specific views or annotation hotspots—enabling reps to nurture leads proactively. In B2B scenarios involving lengthy proposals (e.g., software RFPs), GetAccept’s video integration lets teams embed explanatory clips, tracking watch time to gauge interest. This can reduce sales cycles by up to 30%, per user reports, making it particularly effective for deal velocity in competitive markets.

Ease of Use and Customization

DocuSign’s interface is professional and scalable, with templates and web forms for standardized B2B proposals. Custom branding and API-driven workflows suit enterprises needing governance, but the learning curve for advanced features like CLM can be steep for smaller sales teams. GetAccept, conversely, prioritizes simplicity: drag-and-drop builders for interactive proposals mean faster creation, ideal for field sales reps. Its mobile app supports on-the-go tracking, a boon for remote B2B negotiations.

Integration and Scalability

Both integrate well with sales stacks, but DocuSign’s ecosystem is broader, supporting over 400 apps including ERP systems for end-to-end contract management. This makes it better for B2B firms with complex approval chains. GetAccept focuses on sales tools, offering seamless CRM syncing for pipeline updates, but may require add-ons for deeper legal compliance. For scalability, DocuSign handles unlimited envelopes in higher tiers (with caps on automation), while GetAccept’s per-user pricing scales linearly but avoids envelope fees.

Pricing and ROI for B2B Use

DocuSign’s annual billing ($300–$480/user/year) can be costlier for tracking-only needs, especially with add-ons like identity verification. GetAccept’s $228–$588/user/year range feels more tailored to sales, with ROI from faster closes offsetting costs. In benchmarks, GetAccept users report higher engagement rates (e.g., 40% more opens), while DocuSign excels in legally binding outcomes.

Overall, for pure B2B proposal tracking emphasizing buyer engagement and sales acceleration, GetAccept edges out as the more specialized choice. DocuSign is preferable for teams requiring integrated eSignature and CLM in regulated industries, where tracking is part of a larger compliance framework. Businesses should assess based on deal complexity: GetAccept for dynamic, media-rich proposals; DocuSign for robust, enterprise-wide tracking.

Exploring Other eSignature Alternatives

To provide a fuller picture, consider these competitors in the B2B space.

Adobe Sign: Enterprise-Grade Reliability

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, delivers secure eSignatures with strong tracking via view and sign notifications. It integrates deeply with Adobe Acrobat for PDF editing and supports B2B workflows through API access and conditional routing. Pricing starts at $10/user/month, scaling to custom enterprise plans, with unlimited signatures in higher tiers. It’s compliant with global standards like ESIGN and eIDAS, making it suitable for international B2B deals, though its interface can feel dated compared to modern sales tools.

eSignGlobal: Regional Compliance Focus

eSignGlobal positions itself as a flexible eSignature provider with compliance across 100 mainstream countries and regions globally, holding a particular advantage in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) market. APAC’s electronic signature landscape is fragmented, with high standards and strict regulations that demand ecosystem-integrated solutions—unlike the more framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS in the US/EU, which rely on email verification or self-declaration. In APAC, integration with government-to-business (G2B) digital identities requires deep hardware/API-level docking, raising technical barriers far above Western norms. eSignGlobal addresses this through native support for systems like Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, ensuring seamless, legally binding signatures.

Its Essential plan offers high value at $16.6/month (annual billing), allowing up to 100 documents for electronic signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—all while maintaining compliance. This no-seat-fee model makes it cost-effective for scaling B2B teams, with features like bulk send and AI contract tools competing directly with DocuSign and Adobe Sign in global markets. eSignGlobal is actively expanding as a replacement option worldwide, including in the US and EU.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

HelloSign (by Dropbox): Simple and Affordable

HelloSign, now under Dropbox, focuses on straightforward eSignatures with basic tracking for views and completions. It’s user-friendly for SMBs, integrating with Google Workspace and offering templates for proposals. Pricing is $15/month for individuals, up to $25/user/month for teams, with unlimited envelopes. While great for quick B2B tracking, it lacks advanced analytics or multimedia features.

Competitor Comparison Table

This table highlights neutral trade-offs: DocuSign for depth, GetAccept for sales-specific tracking, and others for niche strengths.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Fit

For B2B proposal tracking, GetAccept stands out for its engagement-focused tools, while DocuSign offers unmatched enterprise integration. Broader alternatives like Adobe Sign provide reliability, and HelloSign suits budget-conscious teams. As a neutral DocuSign alternative with strong regional compliance, eSignGlobal emerges as a viable option for global operations, particularly in regulated markets. Evaluate based on your sales scale and needs for optimal ROI.