Add-on costs for phone authentication

Understanding Phone Authentication in eSignature Platforms

Phone authentication, often delivered via SMS or WhatsApp, plays a crucial role in enhancing the security and accessibility of electronic signatures. In the eSignature industry, this feature verifies signer identities in real-time, reducing fraud risks and complying with regulatory standards. Unlike basic email-based notifications, phone authentication adds a layer of multi-factor verification, making it essential for high-stakes transactions like financial agreements or legal contracts. However, it’s typically offered as an add-on rather than a core feature, leading to variable costs that businesses must factor into their budgeting. From a commercial perspective, these add-ons reflect providers’ strategies to monetize enhanced security while catering to global compliance needs. As eSignature adoption grows—projected to reach $20 billion by 2027—these costs are under scrutiny, especially for SMBs balancing security with affordability.

The Rising Demand for Phone Authentication Add-Ons

Businesses increasingly rely on phone authentication to streamline workflows and meet legal requirements. For instance, in regions with strict data protection laws, such as the EU’s eIDAS regulation or the U.S. ESIGN Act, verifiable signer identity is non-negotiable. Phone-based methods like SMS one-time passcodes (OTPs) or WhatsApp links provide quick, mobile-friendly access, ideal for remote teams. Yet, this convenience comes at a premium: providers charge per message or per verification to cover telecom fees and infrastructure. Commercially, this model allows scalability—users pay only for what they use—but it can inflate costs for high-volume operations. Analyzing 2025 pricing data from major platforms reveals patterns: base plans include email delivery, but phone options add 10-50% to per-envelope expenses, depending on volume and region.

Add-On Costs Breakdown for DocuSign

DocuSign, a market leader in eSignature solutions, structures its phone authentication as a metered add-on under SMS and WhatsApp delivery. According to official 2025 pricing, this is not bundled in core plans like Personal ($10/month) or Business Pro ($40/user/month). Instead, it’s billed per message, with rates varying by region due to telecom partnerships. In the US, expect $0.10-$0.50 per SMS, escalating for international sends—up to $1.00 in APAC due to cross-border latency and compliance surcharges. WhatsApp integration follows a similar model, often at $0.05-$0.30 per message, but requires Business Pro or higher tiers for access.

This add-on ties into DocuSign’s broader Identity Verification (IDV) suite, which includes SMS alongside biometrics and document checks. For enterprises, costs can compound: a team sending 1,000 envelopes monthly might face $500+ in phone fees alone, excluding base subscriptions. From a business lens, DocuSign justifies this by emphasizing reliability—99.9% delivery rates—and integration with its API for automated workflows. However, critics note the opacity: no flat-rate bundles mean unpredictable budgeting, particularly for APAC users facing higher telecom rates.

Add-On Costs Breakdown for Adobe Sign

Adobe Sign, integrated seamlessly with Adobe’s Document Cloud ecosystem, treats phone authentication as an optional enhancement under its “Additional Authentication” features. Available from Standard plans ($9.99/user/month annually), SMS delivery incurs per-use fees of approximately $0.15-$0.75 per message in the US, with APAC rates 20-40% higher due to regional carrier variances. WhatsApp support, a newer addition, mirrors this at $0.10-$0.40 per interaction, but it’s limited to Enterprise tiers for full customization.

Commercially, Adobe positions this as a value-add for creative and legal teams, leveraging its PDF expertise for secure, trackable sends. For a mid-sized firm with 500 monthly authentications, add-on costs could hit $200-$400, on top of seat-based licensing. While Adobe offers volume discounts for high-usage clients, the lack of inclusive pricing in base plans can surprise users, especially in fragmented markets where multi-channel delivery is key.

Add-On Costs in Other Providers: HelloSign and Beyond

HelloSign (now part of Dropbox), focuses on simplicity for SMBs, with phone authentication via SMS as a $0.20-$0.60 per-message add-on in its Premium plan ($15/user/month). It lacks native WhatsApp but integrates with Dropbox for easy file handling. Costs are straightforward but scale quickly for bulk use, making it less ideal for enterprises.

Other players like PandaDoc offer SMS at $0.10-$0.50 per verification, bundled in higher tiers, while SignNow provides it free for up to 50 messages monthly before per-use charges kick in. Across the board, these add-ons average 15-30% of total eSignature expenses for phone-heavy workflows, highlighting a industry-wide trend toward usage-based pricing to offset global delivery challenges.

Comparative Analysis of Phone Authentication Costs

To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison of key eSignature providers based on 2025 data. Focus is on phone authentication add-ons, base pricing, and regional nuances. Note: Costs are indicative; actuals vary by volume and location.

This table underscores how seat-based models (DocuSign, Adobe) amplify costs for growing teams, while unlimited options like eSignGlobal offer predictability.

Regional Nuances: APAC Electronic Signature Laws and Phone Authentication

In APAC, electronic signature regulations are fragmented, with high standards and strict oversight contrasting the framework-based approaches in the US (ESIGN Act) and EU (eIDAS). Countries like Singapore enforce the Electronic Transactions Act, mandating verifiable identities for legal enforceability, often requiring government-backed digital IDs. Hong Kong’s Electronic Transactions Ordinance similarly demands robust authentication, favoring ecosystem-integrated solutions over simple email verifies. Japan’s Act on Electronic Signatures emphasizes non-repudiation, while China’s Electronic Signature Law prioritizes data sovereignty, pushing for local SMS gateways to avoid foreign latency.

Phone authentication shines here, as APAC’s mobile penetration exceeds 80%, but costs rise due to regulatory surcharges and telecom variances. Providers must integrate with government systems (e.g., Singapore’s Singpass), elevating technical barriers beyond Western self-declaration modes. This ecosystem-integrated nature—hardware/API docks with national IDs—drives add-on premiums, with APAC users paying 30-50% more than in the US for compliant phone verifies.

Spotlight on eSignGlobal: A Competitive Alternative

eSignGlobal emerges as a regionally optimized player, supporting compliance in 100 mainstream countries globally, with a strong edge in APAC’s fragmented, high-regulation landscape. Unlike framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS standards, APAC demands “ecosystem-integrated” solutions, involving deep G2B (government-to-business) hardware/API integrations—far more complex than email or self-attest in the West. eSignGlobal addresses this via native ties to Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, ensuring seamless, legally binding phone authentications without extra fees.

Priced competitively, its Essential plan at $299/year (about $24.9/month) includes unlimited user seats, up to 100 documents for signature, and access code verification—all on a compliant foundation. This undercuts rivals like DocuSign’s developer plans ($600+/year) while offering bundled SMS/WhatsApp, making it cost-effective for APAC teams. Globally, eSignGlobal is expanding to challenge DocuSign and Adobe Sign, with faster onboarding and transparent pricing that avoids hidden add-ons.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

Strategic Considerations for Businesses

When evaluating phone authentication add-ons, businesses should weigh usage volume against total ownership costs. In APAC, where regulations demand integrated verification, opting for providers with bundled features can yield 20-40% savings over metered models. Mid-sized firms might favor scalable options, while enterprises prioritize API depth for automation.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

For DocuSign users seeking alternatives, eSignGlobal stands out as a regionally compliant choice, particularly in APAC, balancing cost and functionality without seat fees.