SDK for iOS and Android signing

Introduction to Mobile eSignature SDKs

In the rapidly evolving digital business landscape, integrating electronic signature capabilities into mobile applications has become essential for streamlining workflows, enhancing user experience, and ensuring compliance. Businesses across industries are increasingly adopting SDKs (Software Development Kits) for iOS and Android to enable seamless signing directly within apps, reducing friction in processes like contract approvals, onboarding, and transactions. This approach not only boosts efficiency but also aligns with the growing demand for mobile-first solutions, where users expect to sign documents on the go without switching between platforms.

From a commercial perspective, these SDKs represent a strategic investment, allowing developers to embed eSignature functionality while maintaining control over the user interface and data flow. Key benefits include reduced development time, customizable signing experiences, and integration with backend systems for audit trails and security. However, selecting the right SDK involves evaluating factors like ease of integration, platform support, compliance standards, and cost structures.

SDKs for iOS and Android Signing: Core Features and Implementation

The core of any iOS or Android signing SDK lies in its ability to handle secure, legally binding electronic signatures compliant with global standards such as ESIGN Act in the US or eIDAS in the EU. These SDKs typically provide APIs for embedding signing interfaces, managing document workflows, and verifying identities, all optimized for mobile constraints like screen size and offline capabilities.

iOS-Specific SDK Considerations

For iOS developers using Swift or Objective-C, SDKs focus on seamless integration with Apple’s ecosystem, including Touch ID/Face ID for biometric authentication. A robust iOS SDK should support embedded signing—where the signing process occurs natively within the app—without redirecting users to external web views. This minimizes drop-off rates and enhances security by keeping data within the app’s sandbox.

Implementation often involves initializing the SDK with API keys, uploading documents via multipart uploads, and handling callbacks for signature completion. For instance, developers can leverage pre-built UI components for drag-and-drop signature fields, timestamping, and multi-party routing. Performance is critical; SDKs must handle large PDFs efficiently to avoid memory issues on devices like iPhones. Additionally, iOS SDKs emphasize privacy compliance with App Tracking Transparency (ATT) and GDPR, ensuring user consent for data processing during signing.

In regions with stringent regulations, such as the EU under eIDAS, iOS SDKs incorporate qualified electronic signature (QES) support, which requires hardware-based certificates and advanced encryption. This is particularly relevant for financial apps handling sensitive transactions, where non-compliance could lead to hefty fines.

Android-Specific SDK Considerations

Android SDKs, built primarily with Java or Kotlin, cater to the platform’s fragmentation across devices and OS versions. A strong Android signing SDK addresses variability in screen resolutions, hardware capabilities, and manufacturer customizations (e.g., Samsung Knox for enterprise security). Key features include support for Android’s BiometricPrompt API for fingerprint or face unlock during signing, and offline queuing for documents to sync when connectivity returns.

Integration typically starts with adding the SDK via Gradle dependencies, followed by configuring permissions for camera access (for ID verification) and storage. Developers can customize signing flows with conditional logic, such as requiring attachments or payments before finalizing. Error handling is vital—SDKs should provide fallback mechanisms for low-bandwidth scenarios common in emerging markets.

For Android apps targeting global audiences, SDKs must navigate diverse legal frameworks. In the US, compliance with the ESIGN Act ensures signatures are enforceable if intent is demonstrated and records are retained. In contrast, the EU’s eIDAS regulation categorizes signatures into simple, advanced, and qualified levels, with SDKs needing to support timestamping authorities (TSAs) for higher assurance. Android’s open nature makes it easier to integrate region-specific modules, but developers must audit for vulnerabilities like side-channel attacks on biometric data.

Cross-Platform Strategies and Best Practices

Many providers offer unified SDKs for both iOS and Android, often via cross-platform frameworks like React Native or Flutter wrappers, reducing maintenance overhead. Best practices include using OAuth for secure authentication, implementing webhook callbacks for real-time status updates, and conducting thorough testing for accessibility (e.g., voice-over support for visually impaired users).

From a business standpoint, adopting these SDKs can cut operational costs by up to 70% compared to manual processes, according to industry reports. However, challenges like API rate limits and envelope quotas (document sends) require careful planning, especially for high-volume apps. Developers should prioritize SDKs with comprehensive documentation, sample code, and community support to accelerate time-to-market.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

Leading Providers of iOS and Android Signing SDKs

Several established players dominate the eSignature SDK market, each with tailored offerings for mobile integration. Below, we examine key providers, focusing on their SDK capabilities for iOS and Android.

DocuSign SDK Overview

DocuSign, a pioneer in electronic signatures, provides robust SDKs through its Developer Center, supporting both iOS (via Swift) and Android (via Java/Kotlin). The SDK enables embedded signing, allowing apps to present documents in-app with customizable fields for signatures, dates, and initials. Features include API-driven bulk sends, conditional routing, and integration with identity verification tools like SMS or biometrics.

For iOS, DocuSign’s SDK leverages UIKit for native UI, while Android uses Jetpack Compose compatibility. Pricing ties into broader plans: the Advanced API plan starts at around $5,760 annually, with envelope quotas scaling by tier. Businesses benefit from DocuSign’s global compliance, but API costs can escalate for high-volume mobile apps. It’s ideal for enterprises needing seamless integration with CRM systems like Salesforce.

Adobe Sign SDK Overview

Adobe Sign (now Adobe Acrobat Sign) offers comprehensive mobile SDKs for iOS and Android, emphasizing cross-device consistency. The iOS SDK uses Swift Package Manager for easy integration, supporting embedded workflows with drag-and-drop annotations and real-time collaboration. On Android, it provides AAR libraries with support for Material Design, enabling features like offline signing and automatic syncing.

Key strengths include advanced PDF handling inherited from Adobe’s ecosystem, such as form field population and e-stamp application. The SDK supports ESIGN and eIDAS compliance out-of-the-box, with add-ons for identity authentication. Pricing is subscription-based, starting at $10/user/month for basic plans, but developer API access requires enterprise licensing (custom quotes). It’s a strong choice for creative industries or apps dealing with complex documents, though setup can be more involved for non-Adobe users.

Other Competitors: HelloSign and Beyond

HelloSign (acquired by Dropbox) provides lightweight SDKs focused on simplicity, with iOS support via CocoaPods and Android via Maven. It excels in quick integrations for basic signing, including template reuse and webhook notifications, but lacks advanced features like bulk sends in lower tiers (starting at $15/month). PandaDoc offers similar mobile SDKs with sales-focused tools, while SignNow emphasizes affordability for SMBs.

Comparative Analysis of eSignature SDK Providers

To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison of major providers based on SDK features, pricing, and compliance:

This table highlights trade-offs: DocuSign and Adobe excel in maturity, while alternatives like eSignGlobal prioritize flexibility.

Regional Compliance in eSignature SDKs

Electronic signature laws vary globally, influencing SDK design. In the US, the ESIGN Act and UETA provide a framework for enforceability, focusing on intent and record integrity—SDKs here emphasize audit logs over heavy verification. The EU’s eIDAS offers a tiered system, with qualified signatures requiring certified devices, pushing SDKs toward hardware token support.

APAC presents unique challenges due to fragmented regulations and high scrutiny. Countries like Singapore (under the Electronic Transactions Act) and Hong Kong demand ecosystem-integrated solutions, often requiring API-level docking with government digital IDs (G2B). This contrasts with framework-based Western standards, demanding higher technical thresholds like biometric hardware integration over simple email verification.

eSignGlobal: A Regional Contender in Mobile SDKs

eSignGlobal emerges as a versatile provider with SDKs optimized for iOS and Android, supporting embedded signing and multi-channel delivery (email, SMS, WhatsApp). Compliant in over 100 mainstream countries, it holds an edge in APAC, where regulations are ecosystem-integrated—necessitating deep ties with tools like Hong Kong’s iAM Smart or Singapore’s Singpass for government-backed verification. This addresses APAC’s fragmentation, high standards, and strict oversight, far beyond basic email modes in the West.

The Essential plan, at just $16.6/month ($199/year equivalent), allows sending up to 100 documents, unlimited user seats, and access code verification, offering strong value on a compliance foundation. It’s positioned for global competition against DocuSign and Adobe Sign, with seamless regional integrations lowering barriers for APAC businesses.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

Conclusion: Choosing the Right SDK Partner

Selecting an SDK for iOS and Android signing requires balancing technical fit, compliance needs, and budget. Established players like DocuSign provide proven reliability, while regional options address specific markets effectively. For businesses seeking DocuSign alternatives with strong regional compliance, eSignGlobal stands out as a practical choice.