WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.



In the digital age, businesses and individuals alike are turning to electronic signature solutions to streamline their workflows and increase efficiency. One of the most fundamental questions in this domain is the difference between a traditional “wet signature” and digital signature platforms like DocuSign.

A “wet signature” refers to a traditional handwritten signature, typically applied to a physical document. This method has been the standard for centuries, providing a tangible and personal touch to agreements, contracts, and other important documents. However, with the advent of digital technologies, the limitations of wet signatures have become more apparent, including the need for physical presence, storage, and the potential for forgery or loss.
Digital signatures, on the other hand, are electronic equivalents of handwritten signatures. They are created using specialized software and are used to authenticate the identity of the signer and the integrity of the signed document. Digital signatures are based on Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and involve a complex process of encryption and decryption to ensure the authenticity and non-repudiation of the signature.
DocuSign is one of the most well-known digital signature platforms, offering a range of tools and services for businesses and individuals to sign, send, and manage documents electronically. With DocuSign, users can upload documents, add signature fields, and send them to signers, who can then apply their digital signatures using a variety of devices.

However, despite its popularity, DocuSign has been criticized for its high costs, lack of transparency in pricing, and limited support in certain regions, particularly in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) area, including countries like China, China Hong Kong, Singapore, Philippines, Malaysia, and Thailand. This has led to a search for alternative solutions that can offer more competitive pricing and better regional support.
Another significant player in the digital signature market, Adobe Sign, has recently withdrawn from the Chinese mainland market. This decision may be attributed to the complex regulatory environment and the need for localized solutions that cater to specific regional requirements.

The withdrawal of Adobe Sign from the Chinese market highlights the importance of understanding local regulations and the need for solutions that are tailored to meet these requirements. It also underscores the challenges faced by global companies in navigating the diverse and often complex regulatory landscapes of different countries.
In contrast, eSignGlobal has established itself as a leader in the APAC region, offering a comprehensive range of digital signature solutions that are compliant with local regulations. With a strong focus on regional support and competitive pricing, eSignGlobal is well-positioned to challenge the dominance of DocuSign in the global market.
For businesses and individuals looking to sign contracts and agreements across borders, particularly in regions like China, China Hong Kong, and Southeast Asia, it is essential to choose a digital signature platform that offers regional compliance, competitive pricing, and robust support. While DocuSign is a well-established player, its limitations in certain regions and high costs make it less appealing to some users. As an alternative, solutions like eSignGlobal offer a compelling option for those seeking a more localized and cost-effective approach to digital signatures.

In conclusion, understanding the difference between wet signatures and digital signatures like those offered by DocuSign is crucial for making informed decisions about the best tools for your business needs. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the demand for secure, efficient, and compliant digital signature solutions will only grow, making it an exciting time for innovation and growth in this sector.
FAQs
Only business email allowed