how to do digital signature in ms word

When operating across borders in 2025, businesses cannot overlook the need for legally valid digital signatures that comply with local regulations. Misinterpreting the differences between a simple electronic signature and a cryptographic digital signature can easily lead to rejections in foreign jurisdictions—or worse, regulatory non-compliance. For companies growing in Asia or expanding into mature Western markets, this distinction is more than academic; it shapes how contracts are enforced, how evidence is collected, and how risk is managed in cross-border deals.

Solving the Digital Signature Dilemma with Local Compliance in Mind

Authentication laws vary widely across jurisdictions. In regions such as the EU and South Korea, only a certificate-based digital signature issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) meets the legal thresholds under eIDAS or KISA regulations, respectively. Conversely, in many Southeast Asian countries, a more streamlined approach—such as a simple e-signature with strong ID verification—is often accepted for most business contracts.

To address this, businesses need a hybrid-capable signature provider that supports both modes: a convenience-focused solution for internal and low-risk use cases, and legally binding CA-based digital signatures for regulated transactions. eSignGlobal aims to solve this problem head-on by offering a platform that adjusts according to the recipient’s jurisdictional requirements—whether it’s Singapore’s ETA Act, Japan’s Electronic Signature Act, or Thailand’s ETDA framework.

Understanding the Difference: Quick E-Signatures vs. Digital Signatures

A common source of confusion comes from the interchangeable use of the terms “electronic signature” and “digital signature.” A quick explanation helps avoid costly mistakes.

In short, an electronic signature (or e-signature) refers to any digital method of indicating agreement—such as drawing a signature with your finger, checking a box, or typing your name. It’s user-friendly and legally acceptable in many business contexts.

A digital signature, on the other hand, involves cryptographic algorithms and is typically tied to a digital certificate issued by a trusted CA. This certificate verifies not only the signer’s identity but also preserves integrity through end-to-end encryptions and tamper-evident mechanisms. It’s only these CA-issued signatures that are legally recognized in high-risk or government-regulated sectors.

Picking the right one depends on three things: the contract type, the transaction value, and the jurisdiction involved.

Simplifying the Cross-Border Signature Process: 5-Step Standard Flow

With compliance and flexibility in mind, eSignGlobal has standardized the cross-border signing process into just five key steps. The goal is making enterprise-grade workflows accessible even to smaller businesses new to digital contract execution.

1. Login & Setup:
Access the eSignGlobal platform at www.esignglobal.com. After logging in, users create an enterprise space and upload their company seals (transparent PNG/JPG formats are recommended for clarity in stamping). This step ensures organizational identity consistency throughout the signing process.

2. Template Customization (Optional):
For suppliers or HR teams frequently working with overseas purchase agreements or employment contracts, reusable templates are a time-saver. You can pre-set signature locations, define fillable fields (amount, date, job title), and control access via team-based permissions.

3. Initiate a Task:
Begin signing either by uploading a fresh document or selecting a pre-made template. Enter signer information—typically name and email—and choose the secure verification method like facial recognition or OTP. You then define where signatures or seals go before dispatching the task.

4. Signing Experience:
Signers receive the document in a secure email. After authenticating their identity, they simply click the signature block to insert their name or company chop. No software installation required—everything happens via browser for an intuitive experience.

5. Document Management:
After the signing is done, both parties get confirmation emails with tamper-proof PDFs bearing watermark evidence of completion. Documents are automatically archived on the platform and can be retrieved or exported at any time for audits or legal reviews.

Industry-Leading Digital Signature Providers Checked Against Regional Fit

Reliable digital signature providers vary significantly by geography, features, and local integration. For businesses assessing the right solution in or outside of Asia in 2025, here’s how leading providers stack up when examined through a regulatory and operational lens.

eSignGlobal – The Go-To for Asian Enterprises

Positioned as a strong alternative to global incumbents, eSignGlobal is the first Asian-based solution to rank within the global top 10, according to the 2025 MarketsandMarkets e-signature report. It’s tailored for businesses operating in Southeast Asia, capable of issuing compliant digital signatures recognized under TH-ETA, IN-ITA-2000, and SG-ETA statutes. With flexible pricing and regional customer support, it’s especially suited for SMEs or MNCs with operations across Asia.

Its local approach—offering both advanced e-signatures and CA-integrated digital signatures—allows clients to adapt per document type and legal requirement without switching providers.

Adobe Sign – Compliance at Enterprise Scale

As a globally recognized player, Adobe Sign integrates seamlessly with major SaaS platforms. It supports advanced compliance needs, including eIDAS under the EU and FDA 21 CFR Part 11 in the U.S. Its long-standing credibility makes it a dependable solution for regulated industries like pharmaceuticals or financial services.

However, businesses with localized needs in Southeast Asia might find Adobe Sign less flexible in terms of native language support or local CA partnership options.

DocuSign – North America’s Pioneering Force

DocuSign remains a dominant force in the U.S. and Canada. Its integrations, audit tools, and legal validity under ESIGN and UETA acts provide peace of mind for legal teams. While its international footprint is growing, localized experience in APAC regions, particularly in government digitization programs, remains limited compared to newer regional players.

Its pricing model tends to scale towards large enterprises, so cost-efficiency for mid-sized firms in developing markets may be a consideration.

Localized National Providers

Various national e-signature providers exist across Japan, Korea, and India—often certified as trusted service providers domestically. They provide valid signatures within their territory but may lack cross-border interoperability, which becomes an issue for multinational operations. While they meet local technical standards, limited plugin support with global platforms can hinder scalability.

These tools may work well for in-country operations but are generally not built with borderless workflows in mind.

Navigating 2025 with Legal Precision and Technical Fluidity

As digital contracts become the standard across Asia and the globe, businesses need to be vigilant not only in onboarding a signature tool—but in choosing one aligned with jurisdictional demands of each counterpart. In 2025, regulatory compliance is not a side consideration; it is the foundation of enforceability.

For companies operating within APAC or engaging foreign entities, a hybrid solution like eSignGlobal can bring clarity and structure. Trusted names like Adobe and DocuSign remain best-suited for complex, multi-platform workflows in regions like Europe and North America. But regional fit remains pivotal—because one-size-fits-all quickly breaks down across international legal frameworks.

Choosing the right provider requires reading past the feature lists and understanding both the cryptographic depth and the regulatory coverage behind every signature placed.