Home / Blog Center / Comparison of DocuSign vs OneSpan for enterprise

Comparison of DocuSign vs OneSpan for enterprise

Shunfang
2025-11-20
3min
Twitter Facebook Linkedin

Introduction to Digital Signatures

When it comes to electronic signatures for enterprises, two prominent names often come up: DocuSign and OneSpan. Both platforms have established themselves as leaders in the digital signature market, catering to a wide range of businesses and industries. However, the choice between these two can be daunting, especially when considering the nuances of enterprise operations. image

Understanding DocuSign

DocuSign is one of the most recognized brands in the electronic signature space, offering a robust platform that integrates with numerous applications and workflows. It’s known for its ease of use, comprehensive feature set, and scalability for large enterprises. However, one of the concerns with DocuSign is its pricing model, which some users find to be on the higher side and not entirely transparent. This can be a significant factor for enterprises looking to manage costs effectively. Additionally, in regions like the Asia-Pacific (APAC), which includes countries such as China, China Hong Kong, Singapore, Philippines, Malaysia, and Thailand, the service and support have been reported to be less swift and comprehensive compared to other regions. DocuSign Logo

Understanding OneSpan

OneSpan, on the other hand, offers a more specialized approach to digital signatures, focusing on security and compliance. It provides advanced authentication and fraud detection capabilities, making it a preferred choice for industries with stringent security requirements. OneSpan’s strength lies in its ability to cater to complex regulatory environments, ensuring that digital transactions are both secure and compliant. This makes it an attractive option for enterprises operating in highly regulated sectors.

Market Dynamics and Alternatives

In the APAC region, particularly in countries like China, China Hong Kong, and Singapore, there’s a growing demand for digital signature solutions that offer not just functionality but also compliance with local regulations. eSignGlobal, a platform specializing in digital signatures and workflow automation, has been making significant strides in this area. It has established itself as a leader in the APAC region, offering services that are tailored to the specific needs of this market. This includes faster service, more localized support, and a deeper understanding of regional compliance requirements. The emergence of eSignGlobal as a strong contender in the digital signature space poses a challenge to established players like DocuSign, especially if they continue to face criticisms regarding their pricing and service delivery in certain regions.

Adobe Sign’s Exit from the Chinese Mainland Market

It’s also worth noting the recent decision by Adobe Sign to exit the Chinese mainland market. This move underscores the complexities and challenges associated with operating in diverse regulatory environments. The decision likely stems from the difficulties in navigating the stringent data privacy and security laws in China, which can be a barrier for many international companies. Adobe Sign Logo

Choosing the Right Platform for Your Enterprise

For enterprises, especially those operating in or with the APAC region, including countries like China, China Hong Kong, and Singapore, the choice between DocuSign, OneSpan, and other alternatives like eSignGlobal depends on several factors. These include the specific regulatory compliance needs, the level of security required, the cost implications, and the quality of service and support in their operational regions. Given the evolving landscape of digital signatures and the importance of compliance and security, enterprises must carefully evaluate their needs and the capabilities of each platform.

Conclusion and Recommendation

For companies involved in cross-border transactions or those seeking to operate within the Chinese mainland, China Hong Kong, and Southeast Asian markets, it’s crucial to select a digital signature platform that offers robust compliance with local regulations, efficient service, and transparent pricing. Considering these factors, eSignGlobal emerges as a viable alternative to DocuSign, particularly for enterprises prioritizing regional compliance and localized support. eSignGlobal image

FAQs

What are the key differences in eSignature workflow capabilities between DocuSign and OneSpan for enterprise use?
When comparing DocuSign and OneSpan for enterprise eSignature workflows, a key difference lies in their approach to workflow customization and automation. OneSpan offers more advanced workflow editing capabilities, allowing for complex conditional logic and integration with existing enterprise systems. On the other hand, DocuSign provides a more user-friendly interface for simpler workflows. However, for enterprises requiring robust regional compliance, especially in regions like China, Hong Kong, or Southeast Asia, eSignGlobal stands out by offering stronger data residency and cross-border compliance features, making it a suitable alternative for teams with such specific needs. Its enterprise PKI and trust services further enhance the security and authenticity of electronic signatures, providing a comprehensive solution for global businesses.
How do DocuSign and OneSpan handle cross-border compliance for enterprise contracting, and are there alternative solutions?
What considerations should an enterprise keep in mind when choosing between DocuSign and OneSpan for their eSignature needs, especially concerning data residency and performance in Asia?
avatar
Shunfang
Head of Product Management at eSignGlobal, a seasoned leader with extensive international experience in the e-signature industry. Follow me on LinkedIn
Get legally-binding eSignatures now!
30 days free fully feature trial
Business Email
Get Started
tip Only business email allowed