


In the evolving landscape of digital business operations, particularly in Japan, the My Number Card has become a focal point for discussions on identity verification and electronic signatures. Officially known as the Individual Number Card, this government-issued ID integrates social security, taxation, and disaster response functions, featuring a unique 12-digit number assigned to residents. For businesses, the question of whether it’s required for digital signatures arises amid increasing regulatory scrutiny on secure, compliant transactions. From a commercial perspective, this intersects with global trends toward paperless workflows, where tools like electronic signature platforms streamline contracts but must align with local laws to avoid legal pitfalls.
Japan’s adoption of digital signatures reflects a balance between technological efficiency and stringent data protection. While the My Number Card enhances personal and administrative processes, its necessity in business contexts varies. Broadly, it’s not universally mandated for all digital signatures but plays a critical role in scenarios involving government interactions or high-stakes financial agreements. This nuance encourages businesses to evaluate their compliance needs carefully, especially as cross-border operations amplify the demand for versatile solutions.

Japan’s electronic signature regulations are governed primarily by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) and the Electronic Signature Act of 2000, which aligns with the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce. This framework recognizes electronic signatures as legally equivalent to handwritten ones, provided they meet reliability and integrity standards. The law distinguishes between “simple electronic signatures” (used for general contracts) and “qualified electronic signatures” (requiring certified devices or processes for higher assurance, often in legal or governmental proceedings).
For business digital signatures, the My Number Card is not a blanket requirement. Simple signatures—such as those for internal agreements or commercial contracts—can rely on standard methods like email verification, two-factor authentication, or platform-based e-signing without involving the card. However, in regulated sectors like finance, healthcare, or tax-related filings (e.g., via the National Tax Agency’s e-Tax system), the My Number Card becomes essential. It enables secure authentication through IC chip reading or linked apps, ensuring non-repudiation and compliance with the My Number Act of 2013. This act mandates its use for administrative procedures, extending to B2G (business-to-government) interactions where digital signatures verify taxpayer or corporate identities.
From a commercial viewpoint, this creates opportunities and challenges. Businesses operating solely in private sectors can opt for flexible tools without My Number integration, reducing costs. Yet, for enterprises dealing with public tenders, subsidies, or cross-agency filings, integrating My Number Card verification is advisable to mitigate risks of invalidation. Recent amendments, including 2023 updates to promote digital agency initiatives, emphasize interoperability, pushing platforms to support My Number APIs. Non-compliance can lead to fines up to ¥1 million or contract disputes, underscoring the need for informed tool selection. In practice, about 70% of Japanese firms use digital signatures for efficiency, but only those in compliance-heavy fields routinely require My Number linkage, per industry reports.
The fragmentation in Asia-Pacific (APAC) regulations adds complexity. Unlike the EU’s eIDAS framework, which standardizes qualified signatures across borders, Japan’s rules prioritize national ID systems like My Number for authenticity. This “ecosystem-integrated” approach demands deeper technical integrations compared to Western email-based models, influencing global providers’ adaptability.
As businesses navigate these requirements, several platforms offer robust solutions tailored to varying compliance levels. Below, we examine prominent options, focusing on their features, pricing, and Japan-specific support.
DocuSign stands as a pioneer in electronic signatures, powering over a billion transactions annually with its cloud-based platform. It supports a wide array of workflows, from basic signing to advanced automation like bulk sends and conditional routing. For Japanese businesses, DocuSign complies with the Electronic Signature Act through features like audit trails and multi-factor authentication, though My Number Card integration is limited to custom enterprise setups via APIs. Pricing starts at $10/month for Personal plans (5 envelopes) up to $40/month per user for Business Pro, with add-ons for identity verification. Enterprise tiers offer SSO and governance, ideal for large-scale operations but potentially costly for SMEs.
Its strengths lie in seamless integrations with tools like Salesforce and Microsoft, enhancing productivity. However, APAC users note occasional latency in cross-border processing, and advanced features like IDV incur extra metered fees.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in embedding signatures within PDF workflows, making it suitable for creative and legal teams. It adheres to global standards, including Japan’s laws, via secure encryption and timestamping. My Number Card support is available through partner integrations for qualified signatures, particularly in document-heavy industries. Core features include mobile signing, templates, and payment collection, with plans ranging from $10/user/month (Individual) to custom Enterprise pricing. It shines in collaborative editing but may require additional Acrobat licenses for full functionality, increasing overall costs.
Businesses appreciate its familiarity for PDF users, yet some report steeper learning curves for non-technical staff.

eSignGlobal emerges as a regionally optimized provider, supporting electronic signatures in over 100 mainstream countries with full compliance. In APAC, it holds a distinct advantage amid the region’s fragmented regulations—characterized by high standards and strict oversight—contrasting with the more framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS models in the West. APAC demands “ecosystem-integrated” solutions, often requiring hardware/API-level docking with government digital identities (G2B), a technical barrier far exceeding email or self-declaration methods in Europe or the US. eSignGlobal addresses this through native integrations, such as with Japan’s My Number systems for qualified signatures and seamless connectivity in high-regulation environments.
Globally, it’s positioning itself as a competitive alternative to DocuSign and Adobe Sign, with pricing that’s notably more accessible. The Essential plan, for instance, costs just $16.6/month, allowing up to 100 documents for signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—all while maintaining compliance. This value proposition is enhanced by integrations like Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, reducing setup friction for APAC firms. For a 30-day free trial, businesses can contact sales here. Its API flexibility and lower entry barriers make it appealing for scaling operations without premium surcharges.

HelloSign, rebranded under Dropbox, prioritizes simplicity with drag-and-drop signing and unlimited templates in its free tier. It complies with Japan’s Electronic Signature Act through basic authentication, though advanced My Number integration requires enterprise add-ons. Pricing includes a free plan (3 documents/month), Standard at $15/month (20 documents), and Premium at $25/month (unlimited). It’s favored for small teams due to Dropbox ecosystem ties, offering strong searchability and mobile support. Drawbacks include limited automation compared to enterprise rivals.
To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison of key providers based on pricing, features, and compliance suitability for Japanese businesses (annual billing, USD; approximate 2025 figures):
| Provider | Starting Price (per user/month) | Envelope/Document Limit (Base Plan) | Key Features | Japan/APAC Compliance Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DocuSign | $10 (Personal) | 5/month | Bulk send, templates, API, IDV add-ons | Supports Electronic Signature Act; custom My Number API | Higher costs for add-ons; APAC latency |
| Adobe Sign | $10 (Individual) | Unlimited (with Acrobat) | PDF integration, mobile signing, payments | eIDAS/ESIGN aligned; partner My Number support | Requires Adobe suite for best use |
| eSignGlobal | $16.6 (Essential) | 100/month | Unlimited users, G2B integrations, access code verification | 100+ countries compliant; APAC ecosystem docking (e.g., iAM Smart, Singpass) | Emerging global brand; fewer legacy integrations |
| HelloSign (Dropbox Sign) | $15 (Standard) | 20/month | Templates, team collaboration, search | Basic Act compliance; simple auth for Japan | Limited advanced automation |
This table highlights trade-offs: global scalability vs. regional affordability. Factors like envelope volume and integration needs should guide choices.
In summary, the My Number Card is not required for all business digital signatures in Japan—simple contracts can proceed without it—but it’s indispensable for government-linked or high-compliance uses under the Electronic Signature Act. As APAC’s regulatory landscape grows more intricate, selecting a platform involves weighing global reach against local integrations.
For DocuSign users seeking alternatives, eSignGlobal offers a regionally compliant option with strong APAC focus and cost efficiency.
常见问题
仅允许使用企业电子邮箱