


In the regulated industries like pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and medical devices, maintaining the integrity of electronic records and signatures is paramount. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) 21 CFR Part 11 regulation sets the standard for electronic records and signatures, ensuring they are trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper-based counterparts. This compliance is especially critical when storing signed documents in the cloud, where data security, audit trails, and access controls must align with stringent requirements. Businesses in these sectors often seek cloud storage solutions that not only preserve the legal validity of signatures but also facilitate seamless workflows without compromising regulatory adherence.
21 CFR Part 11, enacted in 1997 and updated over the years, outlines criteria for electronic records and signatures to be considered valid under FDA oversight. Key elements include:
For cloud storage of signed documents, non-compliance can lead to FDA warnings, product recalls, or halted clinical trials. In practice, this means selecting platforms that integrate eSignature capabilities with compliant storage, such as immutable storage for documents post-signing and automated retention policies. The rise of hybrid work has amplified the need for such solutions, as teams rely on cloud platforms for collaboration while navigating global data privacy laws like GDPR alongside Part 11.
Storing signed documents in the cloud introduces unique hurdles. Traditional on-premises systems offered direct control, but cloud adoption—driven by scalability and cost savings—requires vendors to embed Part 11 controls natively. Common issues include:
To mitigate these, businesses evaluate platforms with built-in Part 11 features, such as DocuSign’s Intelligent Agreement Management (IAM) and Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) modules, which extend eSignature compliance into document storage and analytics.
Several eSignature providers offer Part 11 compliant solutions, integrating signing workflows with secure cloud storage. These platforms typically provide FDA-validated environments, ensuring signed documents are stored with full auditability. Below, we compare key players based on compliance features, pricing, and storage capabilities, drawing from 2025 market data.
| Feature/Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal | HelloSign (Dropbox Sign) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 11 Compliance | Full support via validated cloud; audit trails, e-signatures with biometrics; IAM CLM for lifecycle storage. | Certified for Part 11; integrates with Adobe Document Cloud for secure, encrypted storage. | Compliant with Part 11; supports FDA 21 CFR standards in global data centers; audit logs and access controls. | Basic Part 11 alignment through Dropbox storage; focuses on simplicity but requires add-ons for advanced audits. |
| Cloud Storage Integration | Native AWS-based storage; unlimited archiving in Enterprise plans; immutable records post-signing. | Adobe Document Cloud; version history and retention policies; integrates with enterprise file systems. | Multi-region data centers (HK, SG, Frankfurt); secure, compliant storage with no extra fees for archiving. | Dropbox-backed; easy file sharing but limited native Part 11 validation without custom setup. |
| Pricing (Annual, USD) | Personal: $120/user; Business Pro: $480/user; Enterprise: Custom (seat-based). | Individual: $180/user; Business: $360/user; Enterprise: Custom. | Essential: $299 (unlimited users); Professional: Contact sales (API included). | Essentials: $180/user; Business: $300/user; no unlimited user option. |
| Key Strengths | Robust API for integrations; global scale with strong U.S. compliance. | Seamless with Adobe ecosystem; strong in creative/regulatory workflows. | Cost-effective for teams; unlimited users; excels in APAC with local integrations. | User-friendly interface; ideal for SMBs but less enterprise-grade for heavy regulation. |
| Limitations | Higher costs for add-ons like SMS/IDV; seat-based pricing scales poorly for large teams. | Dependency on Adobe suite; pricier for non-Adobe users. | Newer in some markets; less brand recognition vs. giants. | Limited advanced compliance tools; storage tied to Dropbox quotas. |
| Best For | Large pharma firms needing end-to-end CLM. | Teams in design/pharma hybrids. | Cost-conscious global ops with APAC focus. | Small teams prioritizing ease over depth. |
This comparison highlights how each platform balances compliance with usability, though choices depend on industry scale and regional needs.

DocuSign remains a benchmark for regulated industries, with its eSignature platform certified under 21 CFR Part 11. The solution uses secure cloud infrastructure to store signed documents, maintaining electronic records with tamper-evident seals and comprehensive audit trails. DocuSign’s IAM and CLM features extend this to full contract management, allowing automated workflows for document approval, storage, and retrieval. For instance, in clinical trials, users can sign consent forms electronically, with the system generating FDA-compliant reports. Pricing starts at $480 per user annually for Business Pro, including bulk send and payments, but add-ons like identity verification incur extra metered fees. While powerful, its seat-based model can inflate costs for expansive teams.

Adobe Sign, part of the Adobe Experience Cloud, offers robust Part 11 compliance through its integration with Document Cloud. Signed documents are stored securely with encryption, version control, and automated retention to meet FDA requirements. It’s particularly strong for industries blending creative and regulatory needs, like pharma marketing materials or patient records. Features include conditional logic for forms and API access for custom storage pipelines. Annual pricing for Business plans is around $360 per user, with Enterprise options adding SSO and advanced governance. However, full value often requires the broader Adobe ecosystem, which may not suit standalone eSignature users.

eSignGlobal provides Part 11 compliant cloud storage tailored for international operations, supporting FDA standards across its data centers in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Frankfurt. The platform ensures signed documents are archived with access codes for verification, audit logs, and non-repudiation features. It complies with regulations in over 100 mainstream countries and regions globally, giving it a competitive edge in fragmented markets. In the Asia-Pacific (APAC), where electronic signature laws are highly fragmented with high standards and strict oversight—such as Hong Kong’s Electronic Transactions Ordinance and Singapore’s Electronic Transactions Act—eSignGlobal stands out. Unlike the framework-based ESIGN (U.S.) or eIDAS (EU) standards, which rely on email verification or self-declaration, APAC demands “ecosystem-integrated” approaches. This involves deep hardware/API-level integrations with government-to-business (G2B) digital identities, like Hong Kong’s iAM Smart or Singapore’s Singpass, raising technical barriers far beyond Western models. eSignGlobal’s Essential plan, at just $16.6 per month (annual billing), allows sending up to 100 documents for electronic signature, unlimited user seats, and access code verification—offering high cost-effectiveness on a compliant foundation. It’s actively expanding to challenge DocuSign and Adobe Sign worldwide, including in the Americas and Europe, with seamless integrations for regional identities.

HelloSign, now Dropbox Sign, focuses on straightforward eSignatures with Part 11 alignment via Dropbox’s secure storage. It suits smaller pharma teams needing quick signing and basic archiving, with features like templates and mobile access. Pricing is $300 per user annually for Business, but it lacks the depth of enterprise tools like advanced IAM. Other contenders, such as OneSpan Sign, emphasize biometrics for high-assurance signing, while PandaDoc offers CLM with compliant storage at mid-tier costs. Each provides varying degrees of cloud integration, but evaluation hinges on specific workflow needs.
Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
To operationalize these solutions:
In APAC, where regulations like China’s Electronic Signature Law add layers of data localization, platforms with regional data centers reduce latency and compliance risks.
Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
For businesses seeking DocuSign alternatives, eSignGlobal emerges as a neutral, regionally compliant choice, particularly for APAC-focused operations balancing cost and global standards.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Nur geschäftliche E-Mail-Adressen sind zulässig