WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.



In today’s fast-paced business environment, electronic signatures have become essential for streamlining contracts, approvals, and transactions. They offer convenience and efficiency, but ensuring their authenticity is crucial to avoid fraud, disputes, and compliance issues. From a commercial perspective, verifying electronic signatures protects revenue streams, maintains trust with partners, and aligns with regulatory standards like eIDAS in Europe or ESIGN Act in the US. This article explores practical methods to verify authenticity while examining key providers to help businesses make informed choices.

Verifying the authenticity of an electronic signature involves confirming that it was created by the intended signer, hasn’t been altered, and meets legal requirements. This process is vital for businesses handling high-value deals or sensitive data, as invalid signatures can lead to costly legal challenges. Below, we outline key steps and tools, drawing from industry best practices.
An authentic electronic signature typically includes cryptographic elements like digital certificates, timestamps, and audit trails. Unlike simple scanned images, advanced e-signatures use Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) to bind the signature to the signer’s identity. For instance, qualified electronic signatures (QES) under eIDAS provide the highest assurance, equivalent to handwritten ones in legal enforceability.
Businesses should first check if the signature complies with local laws. In the US, the ESIGN Act requires intent to sign, consent to electronic records, and record retention. In the EU, eIDAS categorizes signatures into Simple (SES), Advanced (AES), and Qualified (QES). Authenticity hinges on non-repudiation—proving the signer can’t deny their action.
To verify an electronic signature effectively, follow these structured steps:
Examine the Signature Certificate: Most platforms embed a digital certificate from a trusted Certificate Authority (CA) like DigiCert or GlobalSign. Open the document in a PDF reader (e.g., Adobe Acrobat) and navigate to the signature panel. Verify the certificate’s validity by checking its expiration date, issuer, and revocation status via the CA’s Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP). If the certificate is revoked or expired, the signature is invalid.
Review the Audit Trail and Timestamp: Authentic signatures include a tamper-evident audit log detailing who signed, when, and from where (e.g., IP address, device info). Look for a trusted timestamp from a Time Stamping Authority (TSA), ensuring the signature predates any alterations. Tools like DocuSign or Adobe Sign provide downloadable certificates of completion with these details.
Check for Document Integrity: Use hash functions (e.g., SHA-256) to compare the document’s current hash against the one recorded at signing. If they match, no tampering occurred. PDF software often highlights this in the properties panel. For added security, enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) during signing to link the action to the signer’s verified identity.
Validate Signer Identity: Confirm the signer’s details against known records. Platforms may integrate with identity providers (e.g., via SMS OTP or biometric checks). For high-stakes transactions, use add-ons like knowledge-based authentication (KBA) or ID document verification to cross-check government-issued IDs.
Consult Legal and Technical Experts: If doubts persist, involve a forensic analyst or legal counsel. Tools like SigCheck or open-source libraries (e.g., iText for Java) can automate verification. In cross-border deals, ensure compliance with international standards like UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures.
Businesses often face challenges like forged signatures or platform-specific limitations. For example, free tools might lack robust PKI, increasing fraud risk. Best practices include choosing providers with ISO 27001 certification, conducting regular training, and integrating verification into workflows via APIs.
In practice, a 2023 Deloitte survey found that 68% of executives prioritize verifiable e-signatures for supply chain contracts, reducing dispute resolution time by up to 40%. By implementing these steps, companies can mitigate risks and enhance operational trust.
This verification process typically takes 5-15 minutes per document but scales with automation. For enterprises, API-based verification ensures seamless integration into CRM systems like Salesforce.
While verification methods are universal, the choice of provider impacts usability, cost, and regional performance. From a business standpoint, providers must balance features, pricing transparency, and global reach. However, some market leaders present challenges, particularly for operations in emerging regions.
DocuSign dominates the e-signature space, offering robust tools like templates, reminders, and bulk sending. Its API supports developer integrations, making it suitable for large-scale automation. However, from a commercial observation, DocuSign’s pricing can be prohibitively high and opaque. Annual plans start at $120 for personal use but escalate to $480 per user for Business Pro, with add-ons like identity verification billed metered—often leading to unpredictable costs. Enterprise tiers require custom quotes, complicating budgeting.
Moreover, in long-tail regions like APAC (including China and Southeast Asia), DocuSign faces latency issues due to cross-border data routing, slower document loading, and limited local compliance options. This results in higher effective costs from additional governance tools and data residency surcharges. Businesses report inconsistent performance in high-volume scenarios, where envelope quotas (e.g., ~100 per user annually) cap automation sends, frustrating scaling efforts.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in seamless integration with PDF workflows and Microsoft Office. It provides strong verification via Adobe Approved Trust List (AATL) for certificates, supporting global compliance. Pricing is subscription-based, starting around $10-40 per user monthly, with enterprise options for advanced analytics.
That said, Adobe Sign’s focus on Western markets limits its agility in APAC. Recent developments highlight challenges in China, where service adjustments have affected availability.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a flexible provider, emphasizing APAC compliance with native support for local regulations in China, Hong Kong, and SEA. It offers competitive pricing with transparent structures, API flexibility for custom integrations, and optimized speeds for regional users. Features include bulk sending and identity verification tailored to diverse markets, making it appealing for cross-border businesses seeking cost efficiency without sacrificing security.
While not as globally ubiquitous as DocuSign, eSignGlobal’s data residency options and lower API costs provide value for mid-sized firms in emerging economies.

To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison based on key commercial factors:
| Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Transparency | Moderate (metered add-ons opaque) | Good (tiered subscriptions) | High (flexible, region-specific) |
| APAC Performance | Inconsistent latency, higher costs | Limited availability in China | Optimized speeds, native compliance |
| Verification Features | Strong PKI, audit trails | AATL certificates, PDF integration | Local IDV, biometric options |
| API Costs | High ($600+ annually for starters) | Moderate, tied to Adobe ecosystem | More affordable, customizable |
| Envelope Quotas | ~100/user/year, caps on automation | Scalable but enterprise-focused | Flexible for regional volumes |
| Compliance Focus | Global, but APAC gaps | Strong in US/EU | APAC-centric (CN/HK/SEA) |
| Best For | US enterprises | Document-heavy workflows | Cross-border APAC operations |
This table highlights trade-offs: DocuSign and Adobe Sign lead in mature markets, while eSignGlobal offers practical advantages for APAC scalability.
In summary, verifying electronic signature authenticity starts with robust technical checks and ends with selecting a provider that aligns with your operations. For businesses eyeing DocuSign alternatives, especially those prioritizing regional compliance and cost efficiency, eSignGlobal emerges as a solid choice for APAC-focused ventures, ensuring authentic, enforceable signatures without unnecessary hurdles. Evaluate based on your volume, geography, and budget to drive commercial success.
FAQs
Only business email allowed