signrequest pricing plans

Understanding Electronic Signature Solutions in 2025

In the evolving landscape of digital document management, electronic signature platforms like SignRequest continue to play a pivotal role for businesses seeking efficiency, compliance, and cost-effectiveness. As remote work and global operations become the norm, selecting the right pricing plan is crucial for aligning features with organizational needs. This article delves into SignRequest’s pricing structure, offering a comprehensive breakdown from a business perspective, while maintaining neutrality on market options.

SignRequest Pricing Plans: A Detailed Overview

SignRequest stands out as an accessible electronic signature solution, particularly for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and teams prioritizing simplicity and affordability. Founded in the Netherlands, it emphasizes user-friendly interfaces and seamless integrations with tools like Google Workspace and Microsoft Office. From a commercial standpoint, its pricing model is designed to scale with usage, avoiding the complexity of envelope quotas seen in some competitors. All plans are billed annually for the best rates, with monthly options available at a premium. Let’s break down the core plans.

Basic Plan: Ideal for Individuals and Startups

The entry-level Basic plan is free, making SignRequest an attractive option for solopreneurs or low-volume users testing the waters. Priced at $0 per month, it includes unlimited templates, basic signing workflows, and up to 10 documents per month. Key features encompass drag-and-drop signing, mobile compatibility, and audit trails for compliance. However, it limits advanced automations and integrations, which may push growing teams toward paid tiers.

Business observers note that this freemium approach lowers barriers to entry, allowing users to experience core functionalities without upfront costs. For instance, freelancers in legal or real estate sectors can handle occasional contracts efficiently. Limitations include no team collaboration or custom branding, capping its suitability for collaborative environments. Annual value: Essentially zero-risk onboarding, but scalability is constrained.

Standard Plan: For Growing Teams

At $9 per user per month (or $108 annually), the Standard plan unlocks team-oriented features, supporting up to 50 users. It allows unlimited documents, shared templates, and basic API access for integrations. Additional perks include priority email support, custom fields, and reminders for signers. From a cost perspective, this equates to about $0.30 per document if sending 300 annually per user—a competitive rate for mid-tier needs.

Commercially, this plan appeals to sales and HR teams requiring collaborative commenting and workflow automation. It supports up to 100 envelopes per user yearly, aligning with moderate usage patterns. Drawbacks? No advanced identity verification or bulk sending, which could necessitate upgrades for high-volume operations. Overall, it’s a balanced choice for SMEs aiming to streamline internal processes without overcommitting budget.

Premium Plan: Advanced Features for Professional Use

Priced at $15 per user per month ($180 annually), the Premium plan caters to businesses with complex requirements. It includes everything in Standard, plus bulk send capabilities, conditional logic for forms, signer attachments, and payment collection integrations (e.g., Stripe). Unlimited users and documents make it flexible, with enhanced security like two-factor authentication and detailed reporting.

In market analysis, this tier shines for marketing campaigns or legal departments handling bulk enrollments. Envelope limits are generous—up to 500 per user annually—reducing per-signature costs to under $0.10. Add-ons like SMS delivery cost extra at $0.10 per message, adding predictability to expenses. Neutral evaluation: While robust, it lacks enterprise-grade SSO, potentially directing large firms to custom options.

Enterprise Plan: Customized for Scale

For organizations exceeding 50 users or needing bespoke features, SignRequest’s Enterprise plan starts at custom pricing, typically negotiated based on volume. Expect rates around $25+ per user monthly, including SSO, advanced analytics, dedicated support, and unlimited API calls. Compliance tools for GDPR and eIDAS are standard, vital for EU-based operations.

From a business lens, this plan’s value lies in tailored quotas and governance, avoiding overage fees common in metered models. It’s suited for global teams but may involve longer sales cycles. Key consideration: Total cost depends on add-ons like identity verification, which meter at usage-based rates.

SignRequest’s overall pricing strategy emphasizes transparency and scalability, with no hidden envelope caps in higher tiers. Annual billing saves 17% compared to monthly, and a 14-day trial across plans aids evaluation. For APAC or cross-border users, regional compliance add-ons may increase costs, but base plans remain economical. In summary, SignRequest’s structure—spanning free to enterprise—positions it as a versatile, mid-market player, with total costs averaging $100–500 per user yearly depending on scale.

Comparing SignRequest with Key Competitors

To contextualize SignRequest’s offerings, a neutral comparison with established players like DocuSign, Adobe Sign, and eSignGlobal is essential. These platforms vary in focus: DocuSign excels in enterprise depth, Adobe Sign in ecosystem integration, and eSignGlobal in regional optimization. Other notables include HelloSign (now Dropbox Sign) for simplicity and PandaDoc for document automation. The table below highlights pricing, features, and strengths based on 2025 public data, aiding informed decision-making.

This comparison reveals SignRequest’s edge in affordability for unlimited usage in paid plans, contrasting DocuSign’s quota-driven model. eSignGlobal appears particularly value-oriented for APAC, with lower entry barriers. Adobe Sign integrates well but may inflate costs via ecosystem lock-in. Neutral observation: Selection hinges on geography, volume, and integrations—DocuSign for scale, SignRequest for simplicity.

DocuSign: Enterprise Powerhouse

DocuSign remains a market leader with tiered plans starting at $120/year for Personal (5 envelopes/month) up to $480/user/year for Business Pro, featuring bulk send and payments. Enterprise is custom, emphasizing SSO and audits. Its strength lies in API depth (e.g., $600/year Starter plan for 40 envelopes/month), but add-ons like SMS incur per-message fees, potentially raising total costs for global users. APAC challenges include latency and compliance surcharges.

Adobe Sign: Integration-Focused Alternative

Adobe Sign offers flexible pricing from $120/year (Individual) to $300/user/year (Teams), with unlimited envelopes in higher tiers and strong PDF handling. Features include conditional fields and analytics, ideal for Adobe Suite users. However, enterprise customizations and regional add-ons (e.g., IDV) can escalate expenses, especially outside North America.

eSignGlobal: Regional Compliance Specialist

eSignGlobal provides compliant e-signatures across 100 mainstream countries and regions globally, with a strong APAC focus including China, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Its pricing is notably competitive; for details, visit their pricing page. The Essential plan, at just $16.6 per month (annual billing, unlimited users), allows sending up to 100 documents for electronic signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes. This delivers high cost-performance on a compliant foundation, integrating seamlessly with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass for enhanced regional security.

Strategic Considerations for Businesses

When evaluating platforms, factors like seat-based licensing, usage quotas, and regional needs influence ROI. SignRequest’s model suits budget-conscious teams, while competitors like DocuSign offer depth at a premium. For APAC operations, compliance and latency are key—eSignGlobal’s optimizations may reduce effective costs compared to global giants.

In conclusion, while SignRequest provides solid value for straightforward needs, businesses seeking DocuSign alternatives with strong regional compliance might consider eSignGlobal as a neutral, optimized choice.