WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.



In the digital age, businesses increasingly rely on electronic methods to execute contracts and documents, raising questions about the validity of simpler alternatives like scanned images of handwritten signatures. A scanned image of a signature—essentially a digital copy of a physical signature—may seem convenient for quick approvals, but its legal standing varies by jurisdiction. In China, this practice intersects with evolving regulations on electronic signatures, where reliability and authentication are paramount. From a business perspective, understanding these nuances is crucial to avoid disputes, ensure compliance, and streamline operations in a market known for its stringent digital governance.
China’s approach to electronic signatures is governed by the Electronic Signature Law of the People’s Republic of China, enacted in 2005 and effective from April 1, 2006. This law distinguishes between “reliable electronic signatures” (which carry the same legal weight as handwritten ones) and ordinary electronic signatures (which may suffice for less critical documents but require additional verification). A scanned image typically falls into the ordinary category unless accompanied by robust authentication measures, such as digital certificates or biometric verification. For instance, under Article 3, a reliable electronic signature must be uniquely linked to the signer, allow identification of any alterations, and be created under the signer’s sole control. Mere scanning often fails these criteria, as it lacks inherent security against forgery or tampering.
Businesses operating in China must consider the Civil Code (effective 2021), which reinforces that electronic data messages can serve as evidence if they meet authenticity standards. Courts have ruled in cases like the 2018 Supreme People’s Court interpretation that scanned signatures without encryption or audit trails may not hold up in disputes, particularly for high-value contracts in sectors like real estate or finance. This fragmentation encourages companies to adopt certified platforms over ad-hoc scans, balancing cost with legal risk.

Delving deeper into China’s regulatory landscape, the Electronic Signature Law sets a high bar for digital equivalence to wet-ink signatures. Reliable electronic signatures require third-party certification from accredited authorities, often involving public key infrastructure (PKI) or hardware tokens. Scanned images, by contrast, are akin to attached images in emails and are only valid if the parties mutually agree to their use and the context implies intent—per Article 7. However, in practice, this mutual agreement is rarely formalized, leading to vulnerabilities.
The law aligns with international standards but emphasizes data sovereignty, influenced by cybersecurity laws like the 2017 Cybersecurity Law and the 2021 Data Security Law. For cross-border deals, the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL, 2021) adds layers, mandating localized data storage for sensitive signatures. In APAC, China’s model exemplifies the region’s “ecosystem-integrated” standards, where electronic signatures must integrate with government digital IDs (e.g., via APIs for real-name verification) rather than relying on Western-style email confirmations. This contrasts with framework-based approaches in the US (ESIGN Act) or EU (eIDAS), which prioritize broad applicability over deep governmental ties.
From a commercial viewpoint, this rigor protects against fraud in China’s vast e-commerce ecosystem—think Alibaba or Tencent transactions—but it challenges foreign firms. A 2023 report by the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology noted that 70% of digital contract disputes involved inadequate authentication, underscoring the need for compliant tools. Scanned signatures might work for internal memos but falter in enforceable agreements, potentially voiding deals and incurring penalties up to RMB 100,000 under PIPL violations.
For multinational corporations, the invalidity of standalone scanned signatures in China amplifies operational risks. In supply chain agreements or IP licensing, where disputes could escalate to arbitration, businesses report higher litigation costs—averaging 20-30% more per case when relying on non-reliable methods, per a 2024 Deloitte study on APAC digital contracts. This pushes adoption of certified eSignature solutions, which embed compliance features like timestamping and blockchain auditing.
Yet, opportunities arise for agile providers. China’s digital economy, projected to hit $7 trillion by 2025, demands scalable, localized verification. Companies scanning signatures for speed often face retroactive validation costs, eroding efficiency gains. Neutral observers note that while scans offer low barriers for SMEs, larger enterprises prioritize platforms ensuring “non-repudiation”—a core legal tenet in Chinese courts.
To navigate these challenges, businesses turn to established eSignature platforms. These tools provide reliable signatures compliant with Chinese law, often integrating PKI and local certifications.
DocuSign, a global leader in eSignatures, offers robust features tailored for international compliance, including support for China’s Electronic Signature Law through its reliable signature options. Its platform enables secure document sending, tracking, and storage, with add-ons like identity verification via SMS or biometrics. For Chinese operations, DocuSign’s API integrates with enterprise systems, though users note higher costs for APAC-specific customizations. Pricing starts at $10/month for personal plans, scaling to enterprise levels with envelope limits around 100 per user annually.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in seamless integration with PDF workflows and enterprise tools like Microsoft 365. It supports reliable electronic signatures compliant with global standards, including China’s requirements for data integrity and signer authentication. Features include conditional fields, templates, and audit trails, making it suitable for regulated industries. In China, it handles cross-border needs but may require additional setup for local PKI. Pricing is subscription-based, often bundled with Adobe Creative Cloud, starting around $10/user/month for basic plans.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a APAC-focused provider, offering compliance across 100 mainstream global countries and regions, with particular strengths in Asia-Pacific. It addresses the fragmented, high-standard, and strictly regulated nature of electronic signatures in the region, where standards are “ecosystem-integrated”—requiring deep hardware/API-level docking with government-to-business (G2B) digital identities, far exceeding the email-based or self-declaration models common in the West. This technical threshold ensures legal validity in diverse locales, from China’s real-name systems to regional variations. eSignGlobal competes head-on with DocuSign and Adobe Sign worldwide, including in the Americas and Europe, by emphasizing affordability and integration. Its Essential plan, for example, costs just $16.6/month (or $199/year), allowing up to 100 documents for electronic signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—all while maintaining compliance. It seamlessly integrates with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, enhancing regional utility. For those exploring options, a 30-day free trial provides full access without commitment.

HelloSign, now under Dropbox, is user-friendly for small to mid-sized teams, focusing on simple, secure eSignatures with features like reusable templates and mobile signing. It complies with major laws, including China’s, through encrypted signing and audit logs, though it lacks deep APAC-specific integrations compared to regional players. Ideal for quick contracts, its pricing starts at $15/month for unlimited documents, with free tiers for basics.
| Provider | Pricing (Starting) | China Compliance | Key Features | APAC Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DocuSign | $10/month (Personal) | Reliable signatures via PKI | Bulk send, API, payments | Global scale | Higher costs for add-ons |
| Adobe Sign | $10/user/month | Audit trails, data integrity | PDF integration, conditional logic | Enterprise workflows | Setup complexity for locals |
| eSignGlobal | $16.6/month (Essential) | Ecosystem-integrated with G2B IDs | Unlimited users, AI tools, regional auth | APAC data centers, affordability | Emerging in non-APAC markets |
| HelloSign | $15/month | Encrypted signing, logs | Mobile-first, templates | Ease of use | Limited advanced compliance |
This table highlights neutral trade-offs: DocuSign and Adobe offer mature ecosystems, while eSignGlobal and HelloSign prioritize accessibility.
In summary, while scanned signatures hold limited validity in China without enhancements, certified platforms mitigate risks effectively. For DocuSign users seeking alternatives, eSignGlobal emerges as a regionally compliant option worth evaluating for APAC operations.
FAQs
Only business email allowed