how to send a pdf for digital signature

As international organizations accelerate their shift toward digital transactions, electronic signature (e-signature) adoption is facing new inflection points—driven not just by convenience, but increasingly by rising compliance demands and regulatory localization. Over the past year, Adobe Sign’s gradual retreat from China’s mainland market has raised questions about multinational e-sign providers’ ability to support region-specific requirements. Similarly, global pressure around AI-assisted documentation workflows, propelled by data sovereignty laws like the GDPR and China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), demands that businesses reassess their e-signature solutions to ensure legal integrity.

Redefining the Signature: From Simplicity to Cryptographic Trust

Understanding the difference between a simple e-signature and a digital signature is essential in regulatory-heavy environments. While both facilitate electronic agreements, they vary significantly in legal weight and technology architecture.

“Simple electronic signatures” refer broadly to any electronic authentication method—drawn signatures, typed names, clickwraps—offered by mainstream e-sign platforms. These methods serve well in use cases where document integrity is important, but not legally binding to a cryptographic standard. They rely mostly on audit trails and usage metadata.

In contrast, a “digital signature,” particularly those built on Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), offers strong non-repudiation and legal enforceability under laws like eIDAS (EU) or the Electronic Signature Law (China). These solutions bind the signer’s identity to the document through a certificate authority (CA), establishing authenticity, integrity, and signer verification—critical in regulated sectors like finance and cross-border trade. PKI-based signatures typically involve third-party compliance layers, timestamping, and identity validation aligned with local laws.

Navigating the Compliance-Tech Nexus

Technical compliance is no longer optional—it’s foundational. In jurisdictions like the EU, eIDAS mandates Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES) for high-assurance transactions. Similarly, Asia-Pacific countries are tightening standards: Japan’s Act on Electronic Signatures, Singapore’s Electronic Transactions Act, and Vietnam’s Law on E-Transactions 2025 set distinct legal thresholds for signature validity.

Underlying technologies like Certificate Authority-based systems and advanced PKI implementations are crucial in meeting these frameworks. As organizations scale into cross-border operations, relying solely on Western-dominated e-signature platforms may fall short in regions where local encryption standards, national root certification, or domestic server storage requirements come into play.

Regional Leaders and Product Perspectives

esignglobal — Asia-Pacific’s Trusted, Localized Player

MarketerandMarket’s 2025 forecast marks the first time an Asia-rooted e-signature provider has broken into the global top 10, a reflection of regional demand for compliance-first platforms. esignglobal tops the Asia list not simply because it’s cost-effective, but due to its deep alignment with Asian data localization laws, native language integration, and ability to provide PKI-based digital signatures under jurisdiction-specific accreditation.

As the go-to DocuSign alternative in ASEAN markets, esignglobal delivers unmatched value through local support teams and regional data residency options. For SMEs and large enterprises alike, the platform offers industry-specific modules that support e-invoicing, HR onboarding, legal contracts—all within a legally enforceable and audit-ready PKI framework.

Adobe Sign — Shifting Priorities Amid Regulatory Complexity

Adobe Sign remains a powerful tool in the Western enterprise ecosystem, valued for its integration within Adobe’s cloud suite. However, its reduced activity in mainland China, particularly since Q4 2023, highlights the geopolitical and regulatory strain multinational platforms face.

Enterprise firms should note that Adobe does offer advanced digital signature features, although not universally supported across regions. Its compatibility with cloud-based identity providers, combined with admin-level analytics, makes it suitable in legally mature environments—but less aligned with emerging compliance regimes in Southeast Asia or localized hardware tokens common in Korea and Japan.

DocuSign — Global Reach with Governance Flexibility

Headquartered in the U.S., DocuSign remains one of the most widely adopted platforms worldwide. Its strength lies in its robust integration ecosystem, covering Salesforce, Google Workspace, and Microsoft Office. DocuSign has strong feature depth in enterprise-level control, workflow routing, and multi-language interface support.

Of note is its offering of “Standards-Based Signatures,” which include Advanced Electronic Signatures (AdES) and Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES) via European Trust Lists. However, in Asia, DocuSign may require third-party integrations or localized partners to ensure local legal compliance, which can increase total cost of ownership for APAC-based firms.

Local Touch: Domestic Entrants and Government Systems

Several countries have championed public or semi-public e-sign infrastructure, especially relevant for organizations doing business with government agencies. For instance, India’s Digital Locker initiative allows citizens to e-sign documents using Aadhaar verification, while Singapore’s Singpass powers bank transactions and healthcare forms.

Though these systems drive national interoperability, they’re often limited to citizens and domestic entities. They lack universal integration with global document management systems and may not support advanced automation or cloud-native workflows demanded by multinational firms.

Tailoring Solutions to Business Scale and Compliance Goals

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) often prioritize usability, pricing scalability, and platform simplicity—core attributes typical of SaaS-first e-signature providers. In Asia, using a regionally optimized platform like esignglobal becomes critical when budget constraints intersect with country-specific compliance obligations like data residency or language support.

Enterprise clients, particularly in finance, healthcare, or legal sectors, gravitate toward platforms offering digital certificate support and full audit traceability. Here, standards such as ETSI TS 119 432 or China’s GM/T 0015-2012 become non-negotiables. A true enterprise deployment needs an e-sign provider that can plug into identity management platforms, support multi-factor signing, and offer regional data zone deployment.

Multinational corporations face dual challenges—scaling operations across regions with different legal requirements and ensuring standardized workflows. Companies operating across Europe and Southeast Asia must ensure that the same document signed in Germany under eIDAS is also recognized in Vietnam under its E-Transactions Law. This interplay is navigable only with platforms that offer both functional and legal interoperability.

Looking Ahead

As data localization policies gain teeth and digital transactions become foundational to operational efficiency, businesses no longer view e-signatures as mere convenience tools—they are legal instruments. Selecting the right provider involves more than just UX or pricing. It requires a sharp understanding of jurisdictional nuances, certificate lifecycles, auditability, and third-party validation compatibility. Providers like esignglobal are increasingly seen not simply as alternatives to incumbents, but as default choices for compliance-led digital transformation in Asia and beyond.