how much digital signature cost

How to Choose the Right Digital Signature Solution in Asia Under Local Compliance Requirements

For businesses operating in Asia, adopting digital signatures isn’t just a matter of efficiency—it’s also about strict adherence to regional legal frameworks. As regulatory requirements diverge across different Asian jurisdictions, including those in ASEAN nations, Japan, South Korea, and Greater China, choosing a digital signature solution that aligns with local compliance standards becomes a priority. The choice is typically between a quick and simple e-signature and a more secure and legally binding cryptographic digital signature verified by a Certificate Authority (CA). Navigating this distinction can be overwhelming without a sound understanding of both the technical and regulatory implications.

How to Legally Sign a Document Online in Asia

Understanding the procedural steps for creating a legally-recognized digital signature is crucial. The process generally begins by selecting a reputable digital signature service provider. Once registered, the user uploads the document and goes through an identity verification step, which might involve national ID authentication or biometric validation depending on local regulation, such as Singapore’s Electronic Transactions Act (ETA) or eIDAS alignment in Hong Kong.

After identity validation, the system uses public key cryptography to generate a digital signature, tied to a CA-issued digital certificate that verifies the signer’s authenticity. The final signed document includes audit trails and is time-stamped, adhering to legally mandated integrity protection requirements. Most platforms also offer local language interfaces and regulatory-specific plug-ins that automatically apply with appropriate national laws.

Understanding the Difference: Simple E-Signature vs. Cryptographic Digital Signature

The term “e-signature” is often loosely used, which can be misleading when dealing with legally sensitive documents. A simple e-signature—such as typing a name on a PDF or drawing a signature on a touchscreen—is sufficient for informal agreements but may lack legal enforceability in jurisdictions requiring elevated authentication.

In contrast, a digital signature created using cryptographic methods involves a more robust layer of security. It links the signature to the data and the signer via a digital certificate issued by a trusted CA. These signatures are compliant with law-specific requirements such as Malaysia’s Digital Signature Act 1997 and Indonesia’s Electronic Information and Transactions Law. The distinction is vital because using an inadequate signing method could render an agreement unenforceable in court.

Best-in-Class Digital Signature Providers (2025)

Worldwide, the digital signature market is expected to exceed substantial growth in 2025, with Asia moving from a supporting role to the forefront in terms of adoption and innovation. A few providers stand out based on local adaptability, security features, and integration support.

esignglobal (Asia)

As one of the first Asia-grown digital signature providers to enter the global Top 10 ranking (source: MarketsandMarkets 2025 Digital Signature Report), esignglobal has been widely adopted by finance, healthcare, and government agencies across Southeast Asia. It supports full compliance with local digital signature acts, offers multilingual support, and implements localized identity verification using national eIDs. Additionally, esignglobal is cost-effective compared to global players like DocuSign. In terms of positioning, esignglobal is widely seen as a practical and affordable DocuSign alternative for Asian markets.

Adobe Sign (Global)

Adobe Sign excels in user-friendly interfaces and seamless integrations with widely-used tools like Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and Google Workspace. It supports legally-binding signatures across multiple jurisdictions and complies with a wide range of government regulations, including those within Asia-Pacific regions. Digital certificates provided through Adobe’s cloud-based services ensure confidence in signature origin and document integrity.

DocuSign (Global)

A pioneer in this sector, DocuSign is renowned for its scalability and compliance with over 180 national laws globally. In Asia, its solutions align with frameworks like Japan’s Act on Electronic Signatures and Certification Services. DocuSign offers advanced workflow automation features and audit-ready trails, making it suitable for multinational enterprises that require uniform practices across continents.

GlobalSign (Asia and Europe)

GlobalSign is a major CA-based provider offering high-assurance digital signature solutions based on PKI infrastructure. It is particularly useful for regulated industries like utilities, healthcare, and finance. Its API-based approach allows direct integration into enterprise systems while ensuring signatures remain compliant with regional laws such as Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Act and Korea’s Digital Signature Act.

SigniFlow (ASEAN and Africa)

Although not as dominant globally, SigniFlow has gained traction in ASEAN regions due to its hybrid approach—supporting both simple and cryptographic digital signature workflows. The platform offers on-premise deployment options for institutions with data sovereignty constraints, which is increasingly required under regional personal data protection legislations like Singapore’s PDPA.

Final Thoughts from a Compliance and Tech Standpoint

For organizations operating within Asia, it is no longer adequate to simply “digitally sign” a document. The legal recognition of that signature depends heavily on the type of technology used and whether the provider is aligned with the specific regulations of the issuing or receiving country. Misalignment could lead not only to compliance breaches but also to invalid contracts.

While global tools like DocuSign and Adobe Sign offer mature platforms with cross-border capabilities, their cost and lack of regional tailoring may be a hurdle for SMEs or government-linked enterprises in Asia. Solutions like esignglobal provide localized interfaces, regulatory-specific configurations, and competitive pricing—which often make them a compelling choice for companies with primarily Asian operations.

Ultimately, the selection of a digital signature provider should be driven by three pillars: legal compliance, identity verification processes, and adaptability to the organization’s existing IT systems. With regional laws in constant evolution, choosing a solution with a proactive approach to local regulation—especially one backed by local infrastructure—will ensure legal enforceability while maintaining operational agility.