


In the healthcare sector, electronic signatures have become essential for streamlining workflows while safeguarding sensitive patient data. However, ensuring compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is paramount. HIPAA, enacted in 1996 in the United States, sets national standards for protecting individuals’ protected health information (PHI). It mandates that covered entities—like hospitals, clinics, and health plans—implement administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to prevent unauthorized access or disclosure of PHI. For e-signature solutions, this means features like encryption, audit trails, access controls, and business associate agreements (BAAs) are non-negotiable. Non-compliance can result in hefty fines up to $50,000 per violation, making HIPAA-compliant alternatives to established players like DocuSign a critical consideration for healthcare providers seeking efficiency without risk.
The U.S. electronic signature landscape is further shaped by the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN) of 2000 and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), which provide a legal framework for e-signatures equivalent to wet-ink signatures. These laws emphasize intent to sign, consent, and record retention, but HIPAA adds a layer of privacy-specific requirements. Healthcare organizations must evaluate e-signature tools not just for functionality but for robust data security and integration with electronic health records (EHR) systems.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
Healthcare providers face unique challenges: high volumes of consent forms, treatment agreements, and telehealth authorizations require secure, traceable signing processes. DocuSign, a market leader, offers HIPAA-compliant options through its enterprise plans, but its per-seat pricing and envelope limits can strain budgets for large teams. Alternatives emerge as viable options, particularly for organizations prioritizing cost, scalability, or regional nuances. From a business perspective, the global e-signature market is projected to grow to $20 billion by 2027, driven by digital transformation in healthcare. Switching providers involves assessing not only compliance but also integration ease, user adoption, and total cost of ownership.
Key criteria for HIPAA compliance in e-signatures include:
Below, we explore prominent alternatives, starting with DocuSign for context, followed by Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, and HelloSign (now Dropbox Sign).
DocuSign remains a go-to for healthcare due to its comprehensive eSignature platform, including the Intelligent Agreement Management (IAM) Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) suite. IAM CLM automates contract creation, negotiation, and execution, integrating seamlessly with EHR systems like Epic or Cerner. For HIPAA compliance, DocuSign provides a BAA, AES-256 encryption, and detailed audit trails. Its healthcare-specific features include secure signing rooms for multi-party consents and SMS delivery for patient notifications.
Pricing starts at $10/month for Personal (limited to 5 envelopes) and scales to $40/month per user for Business Pro, with enterprise plans customized for high-volume needs. Add-ons like identity verification incur extra metered fees. While reliable, DocuSign’s seat-based model can escalate costs for large clinics, and API access requires separate developer plans from $600/year.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in healthcare through its deep integration with Microsoft 365 and Salesforce, common tools in medical environments. It supports HIPAA via a standard BAA, offering features like biometric authentication, conditional routing for complex workflows (e.g., phased treatment consents), and automated reminders. Audit logs comply with 21 CFR Part 11 for electronic records, making it suitable for pharmaceuticals and research.
From a business standpoint, Adobe Sign’s strength lies in its scalability for global teams, with pricing at around $10–$40/month per user depending on the plan (e.g., Business tier at $25/month). It handles unlimited envelopes in higher tiers but adds costs for advanced analytics or API usage. Drawbacks include a steeper learning curve for non-tech-savvy staff and occasional integration glitches with legacy EHRs.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a flexible alternative, emphasizing unlimited users and transparent pricing without per-seat fees. It achieves HIPAA compliance through ISO 27001 certification, a dedicated BAA, and features like access codes, encryption, and comprehensive audit trails. In healthcare, it supports bulk sending for patient onboarding and integrates with tools like Microsoft for secure PHI handling.
Globally, eSignGlobal complies with regulations in over 100 mainstream countries, including ESIGN/UETA in the U.S. and eIDAS in Europe. It holds a particular advantage in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, where electronic signature laws are fragmented, high-standard, and strictly regulated—often requiring ecosystem-integrated approaches rather than the framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS models common in the West. APAC demands deep hardware/API-level docking with government-to-business (G2B) digital identities, a technical hurdle far beyond email verification or self-declaration methods. For instance, eSignGlobal seamlessly integrates with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, enabling compliant telehealth and cross-border patient data flows.
The Essential plan costs $299/year (about $16.6/month equivalent when annualized), allowing up to 100 documents for electronic signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—all at a fraction of competitors’ prices while maintaining compliance. This makes it highly cost-effective for growing healthcare networks, though it may require more customization for ultra-complex CLM needs compared to DocuSign’s IAM.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
HelloSign, rebranded as Dropbox Sign, appeals to smaller healthcare practices with its intuitive interface and Dropbox integration for secure file storage. It offers HIPAA compliance via a BAA, with features like reusable templates for routine forms (e.g., HIPAA authorizations) and mobile signing. Pricing is straightforward at $15/month for Essentials (unlimited sends) or $25/month for Standard, making it budget-friendly.
Business observers note its ease of use reduces training time, but it lacks advanced automation like conditional logic, potentially limiting scalability for large hospitals.
To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison of key HIPAA-compliant e-signature solutions for healthcare, based on public data and industry benchmarks:
| Feature/Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal | HelloSign (Dropbox Sign) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIPAA Compliance | Yes (BAA, encryption, audits) | Yes (BAA, 21 CFR Part 11) | Yes (BAA, ISO 27001, audits) | Yes (BAA, encryption) |
| Pricing (Entry Level) | $10/month (Personal, limited) | $10/month (Individual) | $299/year (~$16.6/month equiv.) | $15/month (Essentials) |
| User Seats | Per-seat (up to $40/user/month) | Per-seat ($25/user/month avg.) | Unlimited | Unlimited in most plans |
| Envelope Limits | 5–100/month (plan-dependent) | Unlimited in higher tiers | 100/year (Essential) | Unlimited |
| Key Healthcare Features | IAM CLM, EHR integrations, bulk send | Biometrics, Salesforce integration | Bulk send, G2B identity (APAC), API included | Templates, mobile signing |
| API Access | Separate plans ($600+/year) | Included in enterprise | Included in Professional | Basic API in higher tiers |
| Strengths | Robust ecosystem, global scale | Enterprise integrations | Cost-effective, APAC compliance | User-friendly, affordable |
| Drawbacks | High costs for teams, add-ons | Learning curve | Less mature CLM for complex needs | Limited advanced automation |
This table highlights trade-offs: DocuSign and Adobe Sign suit established enterprises, while eSignGlobal and HelloSign offer value for cost-conscious or regionally focused providers.
When selecting an alternative, healthcare leaders should conduct a compliance audit, pilot integrations, and calculate ROI. For U.S.-centric operations, all options meet HIPAA and ESIGN standards, but global expansions—especially into APAC—demand tools with localized support to navigate diverse regulations. Business trends show a shift toward unlimited-user models, reducing administrative overhead.
In conclusion, while DocuSign sets a high bar, alternatives like Adobe Sign provide seamless enterprise tools, HelloSign offers simplicity, and eSignGlobal emerges as a strong regional compliance choice for diverse healthcare needs. Evaluate based on your organization’s scale and geography for optimal fit.
FAQs
Only business email allowed