Home / Blog Center / Cross-Border Digital Identity and Trust in the EU

Cross-Border Digital Identity and Trust in the EU

Shunfang
2025-09-16
3min
Twitter Facebook Linkedin

The European Union (EU) has embarked on an ambitious digital transformation agenda that places identity and trust services at its core. Building on the foundations of the original eIDAS Regulation (Regulation (EU) No. 910/2014), the revised framework, known as eIDAS 2.0 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1183), introduces a binding European Digital Identity (EUDI) Framework. This framework mandates Member States to provide citizens and businesses with interoperable EU Digital Identity Wallets by 2026. By doing so, the EU aims to harmonize legal certainty, technical interoperability, and data protection standards across borders, thereby fostering trust in digital interactions.

image

The central objective is to enable individuals and organizations to authenticate themselves, exchange trusted attributes, and sign legally binding documents across Member States without friction. This paper examines the regulatory, technical, and socio-economic dimensions of cross-border digital identity in the EU, drawing upon official regulations, Commission implementing acts, and market analyses. Legal and Regulatory Framework The original eIDAS Regulation established the mutual recognition of electronic identification (eID) schemes within the EU. However, Member States often diverged in technical implementation and trust assurance, leading to fragmented user experiences and uneven levels of cross-border interoperability (MarketsandMarkets, 2025).

eIDAS 2.0 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1183) addresses these shortcomings by:

  1. Mandating that every Member State offer at least one EUDI Wallet.
  2. Ensuring cross-border validity of wallets and their credentials.
  3. Requiring conformity with Commission Implementing Regulations (CIRs) that define technical specifications, certification requirements, and notification procedures.

The CIRs adopted between 2024 and 2025 establish detailed obligations. For example, CIR 2024/2977 defines the handling of personal identification data and electronic attribute attestations; CIR 2024/2981 governs wallet certification procedures; and CIR 2025/846 introduces provisions for cross-border identity matching. These acts collectively strengthen legal certainty and provide a unified baseline for trust services. Technical Standards and Interoperability The Architecture and Reference Framework (ARF) serves as the technical backbone for interoperability. It prescribes common protocols, data formats, and security requirements to ensure that wallets issued in one Member State are usable in all others (European Commission, 2024).

Key technical provisions include:

  • Certification: Wallets must undergo certification to guarantee compliance with stringent requirements for integrity, confidentiality, and resilience against fraud.
  • Identity Matching: CIR 2025/846 ensures that identity attributes such as diplomas or driving licenses issued in one jurisdiction can be reliably recognized elsewhere.
  • Security Breach Protocols: CIR 2025/847 defines standardized procedures for reporting and mitigating incidents, reinforcing ecosystem-wide trust.

These measures ensure not only interoperability but also resilience and transparency in the event of system failures. Socio-Economic Use Cases Cross-border digital identity has the potential to transform both public and private sectors:

  • Public administration: Citizens will be able to access healthcare, social security, and higher education services in other Member States without redundant documentation.
  • Financial services: Banks can streamline ‘Know-Your-Customer’ (KYC) checks across borders, reducing costs and compliance burdens.
  • Labor mobility and education: Workers and students relocating within the EU will benefit from mutual recognition of credentials stored in their wallets.
  • E-commerce and telecommunications: Businesses can rely on wallet-based identity verification to expand cross-border operations securely.

These applications align with EU priorities under the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030, reinforcing competitiveness and inclusion. Challenges and Barriers Despite its promise, several challenges remain:

  1. Divergent national readiness: While some Member States (e.g., Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands) already have advanced eID infrastructures, others lag behind (MarketsandMarkets, 2025). This asymmetry may hinder timely deployment.
  2. Privacy and public trust: Although wallets are designed in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), citizens may remain skeptical about surveillance and profiling risks. Public trust will depend on transparent governance and user-centric design.
  3. Technical complexity: Harmonizing standards across 27 jurisdictions, ensuring backward compatibility, and managing evolving security threats are highly complex endeavors.
  4. Adoption and usability: The success of the wallet ecosystem hinges on widespread adoption by both service providers and end-users. Poor user experience or limited private-sector uptake could undermine its potential. Future Outlook By 2026, every Member State must deploy at least one certified EU Digital Identity Wallet. This milestone will mark a turning point in Europe’s digital trust infrastructure. If successfully implemented, wallets could enable a near-frictionless Single Digital Market where citizens can transact, work, and access services seamlessly across borders.

Looking toward 2030, the EU envisions a digitally sovereign ecosystem that integrates digital identity with cybersecurity frameworks (e.g., NIS 2 Directive) and data governance policies. Europe’s regulatory model may serve as a blueprint for other regions seeking to balance innovation with robust privacy and security safeguards. Conclusion Cross-border digital identity and trust in the EU represent both a regulatory innovation and a socio-technical challenge. eIDAS 2.0 provides a comprehensive framework that aligns legal recognition, technical interoperability, and privacy safeguards. If executed effectively, it has the potential to reduce transaction costs, foster trust in digital services, and enhance the EU’s global competitiveness.

The ultimate test will lie in adoption: not only by Member States but also by citizens and private enterprises. Ensuring transparency, usability, and resilience will be critical to establishing digital identity as the cornerstone of Europe’s digital future. ** *References European Commission. (2024). Commission Implementing Regulations on the European Digital Identity Wallet. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

European Commission. (2024). Architecture and Reference Framework (ARF). Retrieved from https://eu-digital-identity-wallet.github.io

MarketsandMarkets. (2025). Digital Signature Market – Global Forecast to 2030. Internal report (uploaded source).

Regulation (EU) No. 910/2014. On electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions.

Regulation (EU) 2024/1183. Amending Regulation (EU) No. 910/2014 as regards establishing a framework for a European Digital Identity.*

Shunfang
Head of Product Management at eSignGlobal, a seasoned leader with extensive international experience in the e-signature industry. Follow me on LinkedIn
Get legally-binding eSignatures now!
30 days free fully feature trial
Business Email
Get Started
tip Only business email allowed