Home / Blog Center / DocuSign vs. Conga Sign: Native Salesforce integration battle

DocuSign vs. Conga Sign: Native Salesforce integration battle

Shunfang
2026-01-29
3min
Twitter Facebook Linkedin

Navigating the eSignature Wars in Salesforce: DocuSign vs. Conga Sign

In the competitive world of customer relationship management (CRM), Salesforce stands as a powerhouse for businesses streamlining sales, marketing, and customer service. As organizations increasingly digitize their workflows, electronic signature (eSignature) solutions have become essential add-ons, particularly those with native integrations into Salesforce. This integration allows seamless embedding of signing processes directly into CRM pipelines, reducing friction in deal closures and contract management. Today, we’re examining the head-to-head matchup between two prominent players: DocuSign and Conga Sign, focusing on their native Salesforce capabilities. From a business observer’s perspective, both tools offer robust features, but their strengths lie in different areas—DocuSign in broad scalability and Conga Sign in tightly knit Salesforce ecosystem synergy.

The battle for native Salesforce integration boils down to how deeply each tool embeds into Salesforce’s architecture, including automation triggers, data syncing, and compliance handling. DocuSign, a market leader, has long been synonymous with eSignatures, while Conga Sign (part of the Conga suite, formerly Apttus) emphasizes end-to-end document lifecycle management within Salesforce. This comparison will dissect their integrations, pricing, features, and real-world implications for businesses, while touching on broader alternatives like Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, and HelloSign.

image


Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial


DocuSign’s Native Salesforce Integration: A Powerhouse for Global Scale

DocuSign’s integration with Salesforce is one of the most mature in the eSignature space, available through the AppExchange and supporting both Lightning and Classic interfaces. As a standalone eSignature giant, DocuSign eSignature plans (Personal at $10/month, Standard at $25/user/month, Business Pro at $40/user/month, all annual billing) extend seamlessly into Salesforce via the DocuSign for Salesforce app. This native connector enables users to send envelopes directly from Salesforce records—like opportunities or leads—without leaving the CRM environment.

Key strengths include automated workflows powered by Salesforce Flow or Process Builder, where signing events trigger updates to record statuses (e.g., marking a deal as “Closed-Won” upon signature). DocuSign’s Intelligent Agreement Management (IAM) and Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) add-ons elevate this further. IAM focuses on AI-driven insights for contract analysis, risk assessment, and negotiation tracking, while CLM handles full contract authoring, redlining, and approvals—all natively within Salesforce. For instance, IAM uses machine learning to flag clauses and predict renewal risks, integrating with Salesforce Einstein for predictive analytics.

From a business lens, DocuSign shines in high-volume, global enterprises. Its API quotas (Starter at $600/year for 40 envelopes/month) support custom Salesforce apps, and features like Bulk Send automate mass signings for sales teams. However, pricing scales with users and envelopes (up to 100/user/year in standard plans), which can inflate costs for large teams. Add-ons like SMS delivery or Identity Verification (IDV) incur metered fees, adding complexity for budgeting.

DocuSign’s compliance is robust, adhering to ESIGN, UETA, and eIDAS, making it ideal for cross-border deals. In Salesforce, it supports embedded signing, where users sign without redirects, enhancing user experience. Drawbacks? Occasional latency in high-traffic scenarios and a steeper learning curve for advanced IAM/CLM setups.

image

Conga Sign’s Native Salesforce Integration: Deep Ecosystem Mastery

Conga Sign, embedded within the Conga revenue lifecycle platform, takes a more holistic approach to Salesforce integration, positioning itself as a “native-first” solution for document generation and signing. Unlike DocuSign’s bolt-on style, Conga leverages Salesforce’s metadata and objects natively, allowing for hyper-customized workflows. Pricing starts at custom quotes but typically aligns with Salesforce’s enterprise tiers, often bundled in Conga Composer or Contracts packages (around $50–$100/user/month depending on modules).

At its core, Conga Sign integrates via the Conga Suite on AppExchange, enabling one-click signing from Salesforce records. It excels in document assembly—merging Salesforce data into templates before sending for signature—reducing errors in contracts like quotes or NDAs. Native features include conditional routing (e.g., approvals based on deal size) and real-time status syncing back to Salesforce fields. For contract management, Conga’s CLM module rivals DocuSign’s, offering negotiation tracking, version control, and obligation management, all powered by Salesforce’s security model.

Business observers note Conga’s edge in Salesforce-heavy environments, like those using CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote). It supports Bulk Send equivalents through Conga Batch, handling thousands of documents via Salesforce jobs. API access is included in higher tiers, with unlimited envelopes in enterprise plans, contrasting DocuSign’s quotas. Compliance covers ESIGN and eIDAS, with strong audit trails for regulated industries.

Challenges include dependency on the broader Conga ecosystem, which might overwhelm smaller teams, and higher upfront customization costs. Integration depth means faster setup for Salesforce admins but potential vendor lock-in.

Head-to-Head: Integration Depth, Features, and Business Fit

In the native Salesforce battle, DocuSign wins on versatility and global reach, ideal for teams needing quick, scalable signing across apps. Its IAM/CLM suite provides AI-enhanced insights, but envelope limits (e.g., 100/user/year) can constrain high-volume users. Conga Sign counters with superior data merging and workflow automation, perfect for revenue ops where documents are Salesforce-native. It avoids per-envelope fees but requires deeper Salesforce expertise.

Feature-wise, both support mobile signing, templates, and reminders. DocuSign edges in payment collection and web forms (Business Pro), while Conga excels in redlining and eNegotiate for collaborative editing. Pricing favors DocuSign for solos/small teams, but Conga scales better for enterprises bundled with Salesforce.

For businesses, choose DocuSign if broadening beyond Salesforce; opt for Conga if optimizing within the CRM for end-to-end revenue processes. Integration reliability is high for both, with 99%+ uptime reported.

Broader Alternatives: Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, HelloSign, and More

While DocuSign and Conga dominate Salesforce, alternatives offer varied strengths. Adobe Sign integrates natively via AppExchange, supporting agreement sending from Salesforce objects with features like conditional fields and audit reports. It’s priced at $10–$59.99/user/month, emphasizing Adobe ecosystem ties (e.g., Acrobat for PDF handling). Strong for creative teams but less AI-focused than DocuSign’s IAM.

eSignGlobal, a rising APAC-focused player, provides Salesforce integration through APIs and webhooks, though not as “native” as the leaders. It complies in 100 mainstream global countries, with advantages in fragmented APAC regulations—high standards and strict oversight where eSignatures demand ecosystem-integrated approaches. Unlike framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS in the US/EU (relying on email verification or self-declaration), APAC requires deep hardware/API docking with government digital IDs (G2B), raising technical barriers. eSignGlobal’s Essential plan ($299/year or ~$24.9/month) includes 100 documents, unlimited users, access code verification, and seamless ties to Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, offering cost-effective compliance. It’s competitively priced against rivals, positioning for global expansion including US/EU challenges to DocuSign and Adobe.

HelloSign (now Dropbox Sign) offers simple Salesforce embedding at $15–$25/user/month, excelling in ease-of-use for SMBs with unlimited templates but limited advanced CLM.

Feature/Aspect DocuSign Conga Sign Adobe Sign eSignGlobal HelloSign (Dropbox Sign)
Native Salesforce Depth High (AppExchange app, Flow triggers) Very High (Full suite integration, CPQ synergy) High (Object-based sending) Medium (API/Webhook focus) Medium (Basic embedding)
Pricing (per user/month, annual) $10–$40 + add-ons $50–$100 (bundled) $10–$59.99 $24.9 (unlimited users) $15–$25
Envelope Limits 5–100/user/year Unlimited in enterprise Unlimited 100 in Essential Unlimited
Key Strengths IAM/CLM AI, Bulk Send, Global compliance Document assembly, Workflow automation PDF integration, Conditional logic APAC ecosystem (iAM Smart/Singpass), Cost-effective Simplicity, Templates
Compliance Focus ESIGN, eIDAS, UETA ESIGN, eIDAS ESIGN, eIDAS 100 countries, APAC G2B depth ESIGN, Basic global
Best For Scalable enterprises Salesforce revenue ops Adobe users APAC/global compliance seekers SMBs needing ease

esignglobal HK


Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial


Strategic Considerations for Businesses

From a neutral business viewpoint, the DocuSign-Conga showdown highlights a trade-off: breadth vs. depth in Salesforce. DocuSign’s ecosystem and add-ons like IDV suit diverse needs, while Conga’s native prowess minimizes data silos. Evaluate based on team size, volume, and CRM maturity—pilot both via free trials.

For DocuSign alternatives emphasizing regional compliance, eSignGlobal emerges as a balanced choice, particularly for APAC operations requiring integrated digital ID support.

(Word count: 1028)

FAQs

What are the primary differences in native Salesforce integration between DocuSign and Conga Sign?
DocuSign offers a robust native integration via its Salesforce app, enabling seamless envelope creation, signing, and tracking directly from Salesforce objects like opportunities and contracts. Conga Sign, part of the Conga Suite, provides deeper workflow automation, integrating with Salesforce's approval processes and document generation tools for more complex contract management. Both support API-driven interactions, but Conga Sign excels in bundling eSignature with document assembly. For users in Asia facing regional compliance needs, eSignGlobal serves as a compliant alternative with tailored Salesforce integration.
Which solution provides better customization options for Salesforce workflows in eSignature processes?
How do DocuSign and Conga Sign handle security and compliance in Salesforce environments?
avatar
Shunfang
Head of Product Management at eSignGlobal, a seasoned leader with extensive international experience in the e-signature industry. Follow me on LinkedIn
Get legally-binding eSignatures now!
30 days free fully feature trial
Business Email
Get Started
tip Only business email allowed