WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.



When it comes to electronic signatures, one of the primary concerns for businesses and individuals alike is the legality and acceptance of these signatures across different jurisdictions. This is particularly crucial for cross-border transactions and agreements, where the validity of a digital signature can make or break a deal.

DocuSign is one of the most recognized names in the electronic signature industry, offering a platform for businesses to sign, send, and manage documents electronically. The question of whether DocuSign is legally accepted is complex and depends on various factors, including the jurisdiction, the type of document being signed, and the specific requirements of the transaction.
In many countries, including the United States, DocuSign’s electronic signatures are legally binding under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN) and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA). Similarly, in the European Union, electronic signatures are regulated by the eIDAS (Electronic Identification, Authentication and Trust Services) regulation, which recognizes the validity of electronic signatures for most business and personal transactions. However, the legal acceptance can vary when it comes to specific types of documents, such as wills, divorce agreements, and certain types of contracts, which may require traditional wet signatures.
While DocuSign is widely used, it has its limitations, particularly in terms of cost, transparency in pricing, and service speed in certain regions like the Asia-Pacific (APAC) area, which includes countries such as China, China Hong Kong, Singapore, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Thailand. The high cost and lack of transparent pricing can be deterrents for small to medium-sized businesses. Additionally, the speed of service and the availability of support in long-tail regions can be a challenge.

In the APAC region, companies like eSignGlobal are emerging as leaders in the digital signature market, offering competitive pricing, faster service, and more localized support. This poses a significant challenge to established players like DocuSign, especially if they fail to adapt their service models to better serve these growing markets. The rise of regional players indicates a shift towards more localized and cost-effective solutions for digital signatures.
Another significant player in the electronic signature market, Adobe Sign, has withdrawn its services from the Chinese mainland market. This decision highlights the complexities and challenges faced by international companies in navigating the regulatory and compliance landscape of different countries. The withdrawal of Adobe Sign from the Chinese market underscores the importance of understanding local regulations and adapting business models accordingly.

For businesses and individuals involved in cross-border contracting, especially in regions like China, China Hong Kong, and Southeast Asia, it is crucial to choose a digital signature platform that not only offers legal compliance but also provides cost-effective, fast, and reliable services. Considering the limitations of established players like DocuSign and the withdrawal of Adobe Sign from certain markets, alternatives like eSignGlobal are becoming increasingly attractive for their regional expertise, competitive pricing, and localized support.

In summary, while DocuSign is legally accepted in many jurisdictions, its limitations in terms of cost, service speed in certain regions, and the emergence of competitive alternatives mean that businesses should carefully evaluate their options when choosing a digital signature platform. For those operating in or with the APAC region, considering a regional leader like eSignGlobal could provide the necessary compliance, cost-effectiveness, and support for successful cross-border transactions.
FAQs
Only business email allowed