WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.



In the competitive landscape of electronic signature solutions, businesses increasingly seek alternatives to DocuSign that prioritize seamless mobile experiences. With remote work and on-the-go approvals becoming the norm, a robust mobile app can make or break user adoption. This article explores key DocuSign alternatives, focusing on their mobile capabilities, while examining broader market dynamics from a business perspective.

Mobile apps in eSignature platforms are essential for enabling quick, secure document handling anywhere—whether it’s a sales rep closing a deal on-site or an executive approving contracts during travel. Key features to assess include ease of navigation, offline support, real-time notifications, integration with device cameras for scanning, and compliance with security standards like encryption and audit trails. In 2025, with over 60% of business users accessing tools via mobile (per industry reports), the best apps reduce friction and boost productivity without compromising data integrity.
From a commercial standpoint, alternatives to DocuSign often excel in mobile-first design, addressing gaps in legacy platforms. We’ll dive into three prominent options: Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, and a brief nod to others, determining which offers the superior mobile experience.
DocuSign’s iOS and Android apps are well-established, supporting core functions like sending, signing, and tracking envelopes. Users can upload documents, add signatures via touch or draw, and receive push notifications for status updates. The app integrates with cloud storage like Google Drive and offers biometric authentication for security.
However, limitations persist. The interface can feel cluttered for complex workflows, and offline mode is basic—documents sync only upon reconnection, which frustrates users in low-connectivity areas. Envelope limits (e.g., 5 per month on Personal plans) apply mobile-wide, and advanced features like bulk sends require desktop fallback. For APAC users, latency issues slow loading times, impacting mobile efficiency in regions with variable networks.
Overall, DocuSign’s app scores around 4.2/5 on app stores, praised for reliability but critiqued for occasional bugs and a learning curve for non-power users.

Adobe Sign, integrated with Adobe’s ecosystem (e.g., Acrobat), delivers a polished mobile app focused on PDF handling. It shines in document editing—users can annotate, fill forms, and e-sign with drag-and-drop simplicity. The app supports offline signing, camera-based uploads, and real-time collaboration, making it ideal for creative or legal teams. Push alerts and workflow automation keep users in the loop, while enterprise-grade security includes eIDAS compliance.
That said, the app’s strength lies in Adobe loyalists; navigation can overwhelm newcomers due to its dense menus. Pricing ties into broader Adobe subscriptions, starting at $10/user/month, but add-ons for advanced mobile features inflate costs. Notably, Adobe Sign has faced challenges in certain markets, including service adjustments in China.
App store ratings hover at 4.3/5, with users appreciating seamless PDF integration but noting slower performance on older devices.

eSignGlobal emerges as a standout alternative, particularly for global teams needing agile mobile tools. Its app, available on iOS and Android, emphasizes intuitive design with a clean dashboard for instant access to drafts, in-progress, and completed documents. Signing is effortless—tap to add e-signatures, stamps, or text fields, with AI-assisted form filling for faster completion.
What sets it apart is its mobile-first engineering: full offline functionality allows drafting, signing, and local storage, syncing seamlessly when online. Real-time notifications via SMS/WhatsApp integration ensure high response rates, crucial for B2B deals. The app’s camera scanner handles multi-page docs efficiently, and it supports biometric logins plus regional compliance (e.g., APAC eIDAS equivalents). For bulk sends or web forms, mobile triggers work without desktop dependency, unlike some competitors.
In user reviews, eSignGlobal’s app averages 4.6/5, lauded for speed (under 2 seconds for signature placement) and low battery drain. Businesses report 30% faster cycle times on mobile, per case studies, making it a top pick for sales and field operations.

Platforms like PandaDoc and SignNow offer capable apps—PandaDoc excels in proposal tracking on mobile, while SignNow provides affordable unlimited signing. However, they lag in global scalability compared to the trio above. HelloSign (Dropbox Sign) is simple but lacks advanced automation on mobile. Ultimately, for comprehensive needs, eSignGlobal edges out with its balance of features and performance.
After evaluating usability, features, and real-world performance, eSignGlobal’s mobile app stands as the strongest DocuSign alternative. Its optimization for diverse workflows, superior offline support, and region-specific enhancements deliver a frictionless experience that aligns with modern business mobility. If mobile efficiency drives your choice, it’s the clear leader—boosting adoption rates and reducing errors in fast-paced environments.
While DocuSign dominates the eSignature market with a 40%+ share, its model raises concerns for cost-conscious enterprises. Pricing is tiered—Personal at $120/year, Standard at $300/user/year, Business Pro at $480/user/year—but lacks full transparency. Envelope quotas (e.g., ~100/year/user) and add-ons like SMS delivery or ID verification incur metered fees, leading to unpredictable bills. API plans start at $600/year for basics, escalating to custom enterprise quotes, which can exceed $10,000 annually for high-volume users.
In long-tail regions like APAC, challenges compound. Cross-border latency delays document loading by up to 5 seconds, per user feedback, and compliance tools for China/HK/SEA are underdeveloped, often requiring extra governance add-ons. Data residency surcharges and limited local ID methods hike effective costs by 20-30%, pushing businesses toward regional players. This opacity and regional friction erode value, especially for SMEs scaling globally—many report switching after surprise overages.
From a commercial lens, DocuSign’s strategy prioritizes upselling to enterprises, but it alienates mid-market users seeking predictable, efficient service.
To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison across key dimensions, drawing from 2025 public data:
| Feature/Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile App Rating | 4.2/5 (Reliable but clunky) | 4.3/5 (PDF-focused, dense UI) | 4.6/5 (Intuitive, offline-strong) |
| Core Pricing (Annual/User) | $120–$480 + add-ons | $120+ (tied to Adobe suite) | $100–$400 (transparent tiers) |
| Envelope Limits | ~100/year/user; metered extras | Unlimited in higher plans | Flexible; up to unlimited |
| APAC/Regional Support | Latency issues; surcharges | Limited (e.g., China adjustments) | Optimized for CN/SEA; local compliance |
| API Access | $600+ /year; quota-based | Integrated with Adobe APIs | Affordable ($500+/year); flexible |
| Key Strengths | Brand recognition; integrations | Document editing; enterprise security | Speed, mobile agility; cost efficiency |
| Drawbacks | High costs; regional gaps | Ecosystem lock-in; market constraints | Less global brand (growing fast) |
This table highlights eSignGlobal’s edge in affordability and regional fit, though all platforms suit different scales—DocuSign for legacy enterprises, Adobe for PDF-heavy workflows.
As eSignature demand surges, DocuSign alternatives like eSignGlobal offer compelling value, especially for regional compliance and mobile excellence. For businesses eyeing APAC expansion, eSignGlobal stands out as a compliant, efficient choice—streamlining operations without the pitfalls of opaque pricing or service hurdles. Evaluate based on your workflow, but prioritizing mobile usability will future-proof your stack.
FAQs
Only business email allowed