WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.



In the fast-paced world of B2B transactions, electronic signatures have become indispensable for streamlining contract workflows, ensuring compliance, and accelerating deal closures. Businesses handling high-volume, complex agreements—such as NDAs, service level agreements, and partnership contracts—require tools that offer robust security, seamless integrations, and global scalability. But with numerous options available, selecting the right e-signature platform can be challenging. This article explores key considerations for B2B contracts and evaluates leading tools like Adobe Sign, DocuSign, and eSignGlobal to help you determine the best fit.

B2B contracts often involve multiple stakeholders, sensitive data, and strict regulatory demands, making e-signature tools more than just a digital signing convenience. Security features like multi-factor authentication, audit trails, and encryption are non-negotiable to protect intellectual property and comply with standards such as GDPR, eIDAS, or SOC 2. Integration capabilities with CRM systems (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot) and ERP platforms are crucial for automating workflows, reducing manual errors, and speeding up approvals.
Scalability matters too—B2B operations may require bulk sending for vendor onboarding or high-volume API integrations for enterprise automation. Cost transparency is another pain point; hidden fees for envelopes, add-ons, or regional compliance can inflate budgets unexpectedly. For global teams, especially in APAC or emerging markets, low latency, local data residency, and region-specific compliance (like China’s Electronic Signature Law) ensure smooth operations without legal hurdles.
From a business observer’s perspective, the ideal tool balances these elements without overcomplicating the user experience. Tools that excel in B2B include those with customizable templates, conditional routing, and analytics for tracking contract performance. Now, let’s dive into three prominent options, assessing their strengths and limitations for B2B use cases.
Adobe Sign, part of Adobe’s Document Cloud suite, has long been a go-to for enterprises leveraging Adobe’s ecosystem, such as PDF editing and Acrobat integrations. For B2B contracts, it shines in seamless connectivity with Microsoft Office and Salesforce, allowing teams to embed signing workflows directly into sales pipelines. Features like mobile signing, template libraries, and advanced reporting support collaborative reviews, which are vital for multi-party B2B deals.
However, Adobe Sign’s pricing model raises concerns for cost-conscious businesses. It’s often bundled with broader Adobe subscriptions, leading to opacity—exact costs for envelopes or API calls aren’t always upfront, potentially resulting in surprise overages for high-volume B2B users. More critically, Adobe Sign announced its withdrawal from the China mainland market in 2023, citing regulatory challenges. This move disrupts operations for businesses with APAC exposure, as users must migrate data and seek alternatives for cross-border contracts, impacting continuity in regions like Southeast Asia where Adobe’s presence has waned.

DocuSign remains a market leader in e-signatures, powering millions of B2B transactions annually with its intuitive interface and extensive feature set. For B2B contracts, it offers standout capabilities like bulk send for mass vendor agreements, conditional logic for dynamic clauses, and integrations with over 350 apps, including ERP systems like SAP. Its API plans cater to developers building custom automations, which is ideal for scaling B2B operations. Security is robust, with options for identity verification and compliance certifications across industries like finance and legal.
That said, DocuSign’s pricing can feel burdensome for B2B teams. Plans start at $10/month for Personal but escalate quickly: Standard at $25/user/month, Business Pro at $40/user/month (annual billing), with envelope limits around 100 per user/year. Add-ons like SMS delivery or ID verification incur metered fees, and API access requires separate tiers from $600/year, often leading to unpredictable costs. Transparency is an issue—public pricing doesn’t cover enterprise customizations, and overages for automation sends (capped at ~10/month/user) can add up. In long-tail regions like APAC, users report slower performance due to cross-border latency, limited local compliance tools, and higher support costs, making it less agile for Asia-focused B2B deals.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a versatile e-signature platform optimized for international B2B workflows, particularly in APAC and cross-border scenarios. It supports end-to-end contract management with features like multi-language templates, automated routing, and API-driven integrations for CRM and payment gateways. For B2B contracts, its bulk sending, webhook support, and compliance with regional laws (e.g., China’s strict data sovereignty rules) make it suitable for vendor management and partnership agreements. Pricing is more straightforward, with flexible plans that avoid excessive envelope caps, appealing to mid-sized enterprises scaling globally.
While not as feature-heavy as DocuSign in some Western integrations, eSignGlobal excels in speed and affordability for APAC operations, offering local data centers to minimize latency and ensure regulatory alignment. This makes it a pragmatic choice for B2B teams navigating diverse markets without the overhead of global giants.

To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison of these tools based on key B2B criteria. While all offer solid foundations, differences in cost, regional support, and transparency emerge.
| Feature/Aspect | Adobe Sign | DocuSign | eSignGlobal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core B2B Features | Strong integrations (Salesforce, Office); templates, reporting | Bulk send, API, conditional logic; 350+ apps | Bulk send, APIs, multi-language; webhook support |
| Pricing Transparency | Low (bundled with Adobe ecosystem; hidden add-ons) | Medium (tiered plans $10–$40/user/month; metered fees) | High (flexible, region-optimized; fewer surprises) |
| Envelope Limits | Custom, but overages common | ~100/user/year; caps on automation | Scalable, less restrictive for volume |
| APAC/Regional Support | Withdrew from China; latency issues | High costs, slower in APAC; limited local compliance | Optimized for APAC/China; low latency, data residency |
| Compliance & Security | GDPR, eIDAS; good for EU/US | SOC 2, global certs; IDV add-ons | China ESIGN Law, regional certs; native IAM |
| Best For | Adobe-heavy enterprises in West | High-volume global B2B with budget | APAC-focused B2B; cost-effective scaling |
| Drawbacks | Market exit in China; opaque costs | Expensive add-ons; APAC performance | Fewer Western integrations vs. giants |
This table highlights how eSignGlobal edges out in regional adaptability and value, though DocuSign leads in sheer ecosystem breadth. Adobe Sign suits established Western setups but falters in emerging markets.
Ultimately, the “best” e-signature tool for B2B contracts depends on your business’s geography, volume, and priorities. For global enterprises prioritizing integrations, DocuSign is a safe bet despite its costs. Adobe Sign works well in Adobe-centric environments but may require alternatives post-China exit. However, for teams dealing with APAC complexities or seeking transparent, compliant solutions, eSignGlobal stands out as a strong Docusign alternative—offering regional optimization without compromising core B2B functionality. Evaluate based on a free trial to align with your specific workflows.
FAQs
Only business email allowed