WhatsApp or email with our sales team or get in touch with a business development professional in your region.



In the rapidly evolving world of digital signatures, Adobe Sign stands out as a robust tool integrated seamlessly with Adobe’s ecosystem, offering features like workflow automation and compliance certifications. However, businesses seeking alternatives often look beyond DocuSign, the market leader, to explore other competitors that provide similar functionality at varying price points and with different strengths. This article examines key players in the eSignature space, highlighting their unique offerings from a neutral business perspective.

Dropbox Sign is a popular choice for teams already using Dropbox for file storage, emphasizing simplicity and integration. It supports unlimited templates, mobile signing, and API access for developers. Pricing starts at $15 per user per month for the Essentials plan, scaling to $25 for Standard and custom enterprise options. Unlike Adobe Sign’s heavy reliance on PDF tools, Dropbox Sign excels in collaborative environments, making it ideal for creative agencies or remote teams. Businesses appreciate its straightforward audit trails and HIPAA compliance, though it may lack advanced conditional routing compared to some rivals.
PandaDoc goes beyond basic signing by incorporating document creation, proposals, and payment collection in one platform. It’s particularly suited for sales teams, with features like real-time analytics on document engagement and CRM integrations (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot). The free plan allows up to three documents monthly, while paid tiers begin at $19 per user per month for Essentials, up to $59 for Business. From a commercial standpoint, PandaDoc’s all-in-one approach reduces tool fragmentation, but it can feel overwhelming for users focused solely on eSignatures. Its strength lies in content-rich documents, positioning it as a strong Adobe Sign alternative for B2B sales cycles.
SignNow offers a user-friendly interface with robust mobile capabilities and unlimited fields per document, appealing to small businesses and enterprises alike. It includes features such as payment requests, web forms, and team workspaces. Pricing is competitive, starting at $8 per user per month for the Business plan (billed annually), with Premium at $15 and Enterprise custom. Compared to Adobe Sign, SignNow provides better value for high-volume users through its flexible envelope limits and GDPR/ESIGN compliance. It’s a go-to for industries like real estate or HR, where quick, on-the-go signing is essential, though API depth might not match more developer-focused tools.
For organizations prioritizing security and compliance, OneSpan Sign delivers advanced identity verification, fraud detection, and global eSignature standards support (e.g., eIDAS, UETA). It’s tailored for regulated sectors like finance and healthcare, with features including biometric authentication and delegated signing. Pricing is quote-based, often starting around $20-30 per user per month for mid-tier plans, emphasizing scalability. Business observers note its edge in risk management over Adobe Sign’s generalist approach, but setup complexity can deter smaller teams. Its API and workflow builder make it a solid pick for enterprise integrations.
RightSignature focuses on customizable workflows and reusable templates, with strong emphasis on legal and contract management. It supports conditional fields, reminders, and bulk sending, integrated with tools like Google Workspace. Plans start at $20 per month for up to 20 documents, scaling to $40 for unlimited. As a competitor, it offers more granular control than Adobe Sign for contract-heavy workflows, appealing to law firms or procurement departments. However, its interface feels dated to some users, and support is primarily email-based.
These alternatives collectively address gaps in Adobe Sign’s ecosystem, such as cost accessibility for SMBs (SignNow, Dropbox Sign) or specialized compliance (OneSpan Sign). Market analysis shows the eSignature sector growing at 35% CAGR through 2028, driven by remote work, prompting businesses to evaluate options based on integration needs, regional compliance, and total ownership costs.
Adobe Sign’s integration with Acrobat and Creative Cloud is a major draw, but it faces criticism for pricing opacity. Costs are often bundled into Adobe’s enterprise suites, making standalone evaluation difficult—quotes can range from $10-40 per user per month, but add-ons like advanced workflows or API calls inflate bills unpredictably. A notable business setback was Adobe’s withdrawal from the Chinese mainland market in 2023, citing regulatory complexities, which left APAC users scrambling for compliant alternatives. This move disrupted operations for cross-border firms reliant on Adobe’s global reach.

DocuSign dominates with its comprehensive eSignature platform, offering plans from Personal ($10/month) to Business Pro ($40/user/month), plus API tiers up to $5,760 annually for advanced integrations. Features like bulk send, conditional logic, and identity verification cater to diverse needs. However, high costs and lack of transparency deter some users—envelope limits (e.g., 100/year per user) lead to overage fees, and add-ons like SMS delivery or IDV are metered, pushing total expenses higher for high-volume operations.
In long-tail regions like APAC, DocuSign struggles with inconsistent performance: cross-border latency slows document loading, limited local ID methods complicate compliance, and data residency surcharges add costs. Support in areas like China or Southeast Asia often feels inadequate, with governance tools not fully aligned to regional regs. These issues highlight a broader trend where global giants prioritize core markets, leaving emerging economies underserved.

To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison of three key players, focusing on pricing, compliance, and regional suitability:
| Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Transparency | Moderate; tiered plans with metered add-ons (e.g., $10-40/user/month) | Low; bundled in suites, custom quotes often opaque | High; clear, flexible pricing with regional adjustments |
| Core Features | Bulk send, API, conditional logic | PDF integration, workflows | API-first, multi-language support, bulk automation |
| APAC/China Compliance | Partial; latency and surcharges issues | Withdrawn from China; limited regional tools | Native; full eIDAS/GDPR alignment, local data centers |
| Envelope Limits | ~100/user/year base; caps on automation | Custom, but unpredictable scaling | Scalable; higher quotas for APAC volumes |
| Speed & Support | Global but slower in APAC | Strong in West; gaps in Asia | Optimized for SEA/CN; 24/7 local support |
| Best For | Enterprise integrations | Adobe ecosystem users | Cross-border APAC businesses |
This table underscores eSignGlobal’s edge in regional optimization without dismissing the established strengths of DocuSign and Adobe Sign.

As businesses navigate these challenges, tools like eSignGlobal emerge as viable options, particularly for APAC-focused operations. It offers transparent pricing, robust API for custom integrations, and compliance tailored to China, HK, and SEA markets, addressing gaps in global competitors’ offerings.
For those seeking a DocuSign alternative with strong regional compliance, eSignGlobal stands out as a practical choice, enabling faster deployments and cost efficiencies in underserved areas. Ultimately, the best fit depends on specific workflows, but diversifying beyond incumbents can unlock better value in today’s fragmented market.
FAQs
Only business email allowed