


In the fast-paced world of corporate governance, board resolutions serve as critical documents that formalize key decisions, from approving mergers to authorizing financial transactions. Traditionally, these resolutions required physical signatures from multiple directors, often involving printed copies, couriers, and in-person meetings—a process that’s time-consuming and prone to delays. Enter digital signing: a streamlined alternative that allows board members to review, approve, and sign resolutions electronically from anywhere in the world. This shift not only enhances efficiency but also aligns with modern demands for remote collaboration, especially post-pandemic.
From a business perspective, adopting digital signing for board resolutions can reduce administrative overhead by up to 80%, according to industry reports from firms like Gartner. It ensures audit trails for compliance, minimizes errors from manual handling, and supports real-time notifications to keep stakeholders aligned. However, selecting the right eSignature platform is key, as it must handle sensitive corporate data securely while meeting legal standards. For multinational companies, this often means navigating varying regulations across jurisdictions.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
A board resolution is a formal record of decisions made by a company’s board of directors, often required for significant actions like issuing shares, appointing executives, or entering contracts. In jurisdictions like the United States, under laws such as the Delaware General Corporation Law, these documents must be signed by a quorum of directors to be legally binding. Similarly, in the European Union, the eIDAS Regulation provides a framework for electronic signatures to carry the same weight as handwritten ones, provided they meet qualified electronic signature (QES) standards.
Digital signing transforms this by using secure platforms to upload the resolution document, route it sequentially or in parallel to directors for review, and capture their electronic approvals. Platforms typically include features like multi-factor authentication, timestamping, and immutable logs to verify authenticity.
Businesses adopting digital signing for board resolutions report faster decision-making cycles—often reducing approval times from days to hours. This is particularly valuable for global teams spread across time zones. Security is another pillar: encryption and compliance with standards like SOC 2 ensure that resolutions remain tamper-proof. Moreover, in regulated industries such as finance or healthcare, digital tools help maintain records that satisfy audits under frameworks like SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) in the US.
From an operational standpoint, the process involves:
Challenges include ensuring all signers have access to reliable internet and that the platform supports mobile signing for on-the-go executives. Cost is also a factor—while free tiers exist for basic use, enterprise needs demand scalable pricing without per-user fees.
For US-based companies, the ESIGN Act and UETA (Uniform Electronic Transactions Act) affirm that electronic signatures are enforceable for board resolutions, as long as intent to sign is clear and records are retained. In the EU, eIDAS categorizes signatures into simple, advanced, and qualified levels, with QES recommended for high-stakes corporate documents to match notarial equivalents.
In Asia-Pacific (APAC) markets, regulations are more fragmented. Singapore’s Electronic Transactions Act mirrors ESIGN but integrates with national digital IDs like Singpass for enhanced verification. Hong Kong’s Electronic Transactions Ordinance supports digital signing, bolstered by tools like iAM Smart for government-backed authentication. These APAC laws emphasize ecosystem integration, requiring platforms to connect with local digital identities rather than relying solely on email verification, which raises the technical bar compared to the more framework-based approaches in the US and EU.
When choosing a platform for board resolutions, businesses weigh factors like ease of use, compliance, pricing, and integration capabilities. Below, we examine prominent options: DocuSign, Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, and HelloSign (now part of Dropbox).
DocuSign dominates the eSignature market with its robust ecosystem, serving over 1 million customers globally. For board resolutions, it excels in workflow automation, allowing directors to sign via desktop or mobile with features like sequential routing and real-time status updates. Its compliance suite covers ESIGN, eIDAS, and HIPAA, making it suitable for multinational boards. Pricing starts at around $10 per user per month for basic plans, scaling to enterprise tiers with API access. While powerful, its per-seat model can add up for large boards, and APAC latency has been noted in some reviews.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, integrates deeply with PDF tools, ideal for editing board resolutions before signing. It supports advanced features like conditional logic for approvals and bulk sending for multiple directors. Compliant with global standards including eIDAS and ESIGN, it’s favored by enterprises using Adobe Acrobat. Pricing is tiered, starting at $10 per user monthly, with add-ons for APIs. Drawbacks include a steeper learning curve for non-Adobe users and occasional customization limits for branding.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a cost-effective alternative, compliant in over 100 mainstream countries and regions worldwide. It holds a strong edge in APAC, where electronic signature landscapes are fragmented, with high standards and strict regulations demanding ecosystem-integrated solutions. Unlike the framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS in the West, APAC requires deep hardware/API-level docking with government-to-business (G2B) digital identities—far exceeding simple email or self-declaration methods. eSignGlobal addresses this through seamless integrations like Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, ensuring resolutions meet local legal efficacy.
The platform is expanding aggressively in Europe and the Americas to compete with DocuSign and Adobe Sign, offering competitive pricing: its Essential plan at just $16.6 per month allows sending up to 100 documents, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—all while maintaining high compliance. This makes it highly cost-effective for boards with varying sizes, especially in regulated APAC sectors like finance and real estate.

HelloSign, rebranded under Dropbox, emphasizes simplicity with drag-and-drop signing and templates for quick board resolution setups. It supports ESIGN and eIDAS compliance, with strong mobile apps for remote directors. Pricing begins at $15 per user monthly, including unlimited templates. It’s ideal for smaller boards but may lack advanced enterprise features like custom APIs compared to larger rivals.
Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison based on key criteria for board resolution signing:
| Feature/Platform | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal | HelloSign (Dropbox Sign) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing (Entry-Level, per Month) | $10/user | $10/user | $16.6 (unlimited users) | $15/user |
| User Limits | Per-seat billing | Per-seat billing | Unlimited users | Per-seat billing |
| Compliance (Global/APAC Focus) | ESIGN, eIDAS, strong in US/EU | ESIGN, eIDAS, PDF-centric | 100+ countries, APAC depth (iAM Smart, Singpass) | ESIGN, eIDAS, basic APAC |
| Key Features for Boards | Workflow automation, API | PDF editing, bulk send | Bulk send, AI risk check, no seat fees | Templates, mobile signing |
| Integration Ease | High (Salesforce, Microsoft) | High (Adobe ecosystem) | Strong APAC IDs, SSO | Dropbox, Google Workspace |
| Best For | Large enterprises | Document workflows | Cost-sensitive APAC boards | SMBs needing simplicity |
| Drawbacks | Higher costs for teams | Learning curve | Less brand recognition outside APAC | Limited advanced security |
This table highlights trade-offs: DocuSign and Adobe Sign lead in maturity, while eSignGlobal offers value in compliance-heavy regions, and HelloSign prioritizes accessibility.
Implementing digital signing for board resolutions isn’t without hurdles. Ensure platform selection aligns with your company’s jurisdiction—consult legal experts for APAC operations where G2B integrations are mandatory. Train directors on the tool to avoid adoption resistance, and pilot with a sample resolution to test workflows.
In summary, digital signing elevates board efficiency while upholding governance standards. For DocuSign users seeking alternatives, eSignGlobal emerges as a regionally compliant option with competitive economics. Businesses should evaluate based on their global footprint and budget for optimal results.
Câu hỏi thường gặp
Chỉ được phép sử dụng email doanh nghiệp