DocuSign Insight: building custom extraction policies for non-standard clauses

Navigating Custom Extraction Policies in DocuSign for Non-Standard Clauses

In the evolving landscape of contract management, businesses increasingly rely on electronic signature platforms to streamline workflows while ensuring compliance and accuracy. DocuSign, a leader in this space, offers robust tools for handling agreements, but non-standard clauses—such as bespoke indemnity terms, jurisdiction-specific riders, or industry-unique warranties—often require tailored approaches. This article explores how to build custom extraction policies within DocuSign’s ecosystem, drawing from commercial insights into its Intelligent Agreement Management (IAM) capabilities. By focusing on practical implementation, we aim to highlight strategies that enhance efficiency without overcomplicating processes.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

Understanding Non-Standard Clauses and Extraction Challenges

Non-standard clauses deviate from template-based language, introducing variability that standard AI extraction tools may overlook. For instance, a clause on data sovereignty in cross-border deals might reference specific regional laws, complicating automated parsing. In DocuSign’s IAM CLM (Contract Lifecycle Management), extraction policies refer to configurable rules that leverage AI and machine learning to identify, tag, and pull these elements from documents. This is particularly valuable for enterprises dealing with high-volume, diverse contracts, where manual review can bottleneck operations.

From a business perspective, poor extraction leads to compliance risks and delayed negotiations. DocuSign’s approach integrates with its eSignature core, allowing users to define policies that adapt to unique needs. Key benefits include reduced legal review time—potentially by 40-50% based on industry benchmarks—and improved data analytics for risk assessment.

Building Custom Extraction Policies in DocuSign IAM CLM

DocuSign’s IAM CLM is an advanced module within its broader platform, designed for end-to-end contract management. It goes beyond basic signing by incorporating AI-driven insights, workflow automation, and clause libraries. For non-standard clauses, IAM CLM enables users to create custom extraction policies through its no-code interface, making it accessible for legal teams without deep technical expertise.

Step 1: Define Clause Parameters

Start by accessing the IAM CLM dashboard under the “Agreements” section. Identify the non-standard elements you need to extract, such as custom liability caps or ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) disclosures. Use the clause library to tag base patterns—e.g., “indemnity” or “termination”—then customize for variations. For example, if dealing with APAC regulations, incorporate keywords like “data localization” to flag clauses tied to local laws, such as Singapore’s PDPA or Hong Kong’s PDPO. This step ensures policies are regionally aware, though DocuSign’s global compliance focuses more on ESIGN/UETA in the US and eIDAS in the EU.

Step 2: Leverage AI Configuration Tools

IAM CLM’s AI engine allows rule-based and ML-enhanced extraction. Navigate to “Extraction Policies” in settings and select “Custom Rule Builder.” Define triggers using regex patterns or natural language prompts—for instance, extracting “force majeure events specific to supply chain disruptions.” Train the model with sample documents via the upload feature, iterating on accuracy. Commercial users report that fine-tuning with 50-100 examples achieves 85-95% precision for non-standard items, minimizing false positives.

Integration with DocuSign’s API further enhances this. For developer-savvy teams, the Advanced API plan (starting at $5,760/year) supports programmatic policy updates, ideal for scaling across departments. However, envelope quotas (e.g., ~100 per user/year in Business Pro) apply, so monitor usage to avoid overages.

Step 3: Implement Validation and Workflow Integration

Once built, test policies in a sandbox environment. IAM CLM auto-generates reports highlighting extracted data, which can feed into dashboards for analytics. Link policies to workflows—e.g., routing non-standard clauses for human review via conditional logic. For compliance, enable audit trails that log extractions, aligning with standards like SOC 2.

Challenges include handling multilingual documents; DocuSign supports major languages but may require add-ons like IDV for verification. Businesses in regulated sectors, such as finance, often pair this with SSO for secure access. Overall, these policies transform IAM CLM from a signing tool into a proactive risk mitigator, though customization demands initial investment in training.

Best Practices for Optimization

To maximize ROI, start small: Pilot policies on one contract type before enterprise rollout. Collaborate with DocuSign’s support (premium in Enterprise plans) for bespoke tuning. Metrics like extraction speed and error rates should guide iterations. In a commercial context, this setup supports agile operations, especially for firms with global footprints where non-standard clauses arise from jurisdictional variances.

DocuSign’s IAM CLM: A Deeper Dive

DocuSign’s IAM CLM builds on its eSignature foundation, offering AI-powered contract review, negotiation tracking, and obligation management. Priced as an upgrade to plans like Business Pro ($40/user/month annually), it includes features like clause comparison and redline automation. For non-standard clauses, its extraction engine uses NLP to contextualize language, reducing manual effort. While powerful, it’s seat-based, which can escalate costs for large teams—e.g., $480/user/year base plus add-ons.

Competitor Landscape: Key Players in eSignature and CLM

The eSignature market is competitive, with platforms differentiating on pricing, compliance, and customization. Adobe Sign emphasizes seamless integration with Adobe’s ecosystem, offering robust extraction via Adobe Sensei AI. It’s ideal for creative industries, with plans starting at $10/user/month for individuals, scaling to Enterprise custom pricing. However, its CLM features are less specialized for non-standard clauses compared to DocuSign, focusing more on PDF workflows.

HelloSign (now part of Dropbox), targets SMBs with simple, intuitive signing. Its extraction is basic, relying on templates rather than advanced AI policies, priced at $15/user/month. It’s cost-effective for low-volume needs but lacks depth for complex CLM.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a global contender, compliant in 100 mainstream countries, with a strong edge in APAC. The region features fragmented regulations—high standards and strict oversight—contrasting the framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS in the West. APAC demands “ecosystem-integrated” compliance, involving deep hardware/API integrations with government digital identities (G2B), far exceeding email-based verification. eSignGlobal excels here, seamlessly integrating with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass. Its Essential plan costs $16.6/month ($299/year), allowing 100 documents, unlimited users, and access code verification—offering high value on compliance without seat fees. This makes it competitive against DocuSign and Adobe Sign, especially in pricing and regional optimization, as part of a broader replacement strategy in global markets.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

Comparative Analysis: DocuSign vs. Competitors

This table underscores a balanced market: DocuSign leads in maturity, while alternatives like eSignGlobal shine in affordability and localization.

Final Thoughts on Alternatives

For businesses seeking DocuSign alternatives, eSignGlobal emerges as a neutral, regionally compliant option, particularly for APAC operations where customized extraction and cost efficiency matter. Evaluate based on your scale and needs for optimal fit.