DocuSign and US StateRAMP: Authorization status for state governments

Understanding StateRAMP and Its Role in US State Government Procurement

StateRAMP, or the State Risk and Authorization Management Program, represents a collaborative framework designed to streamline cloud service authorizations for US state governments. Launched as an extension of the federal FedRAMP model, StateRAMP aims to reduce redundancy in security assessments, enabling vendors to achieve a single authorization that multiple states can leverage. This initiative addresses the fragmented procurement processes across the 50 states, where each might otherwise require independent audits for cloud-based tools like electronic signature platforms. For state agencies handling sensitive data—such as contracts, permits, and public records—StateRAMP ensures compliance with rigorous cybersecurity standards, including NIST frameworks and data encryption requirements.

In the context of electronic signatures, StateRAMP authorization is crucial for tools used in government workflows. The US electronic signature landscape is governed primarily by the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN Act) of 2000 and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), adopted by 49 states (with slight variations in New York and Illinois). These laws establish electronic signatures as legally equivalent to wet-ink signatures, provided they meet criteria for intent, consent, and record integrity. However, state governments often impose additional layers of compliance, such as accessibility under Section 508, data sovereignty, and audit trails, which StateRAMP helps standardize. This regulatory environment underscores the need for eSignature providers to demonstrate not just legal validity but also robust security for public sector use.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

DocuSign’s StateRAMP Authorization Status for State Governments

DocuSign, a leading provider of electronic signature and agreement management solutions, has made significant strides in securing government authorizations, but its StateRAMP status remains a work in progress as of 2025. While DocuSign holds FedRAMP Moderate authorization for its eSignature cloud service—validated through third-party assessments for federal use—the company is actively pursuing StateRAMP alignment. This involves mapping its controls to the StateRAMP Provisional Authorization to Operate (P-ATO) framework, which covers areas like access control, incident response, and continuous monitoring.

For state governments, DocuSign’s partial alignment means it can be procured in states participating in StateRAMP reciprocity, such as Colorado, Utah, and Maryland, where FedRAMP baselines provide a bridge. However, full StateRAMP authorization would eliminate the need for state-specific reviews, potentially accelerating adoption. DocuSign reports serving over 1,000 government entities, including state agencies, with features tailored for public sector needs like secure envelopes and audit logs compliant with ESIGN and UETA. Challenges include the program’s relative novelty—StateRAMP only gained momentum post-2022—and the need for vendor transparency in reporting control implementations.

Observers note that DocuSign’s investment in compliance, including SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications, positions it well for eventual full authorization. Yet, state IT leaders should verify current status via the StateRAMP marketplace, as authorizations evolve. This ongoing pursuit highlights a broader trend: eSignature vendors must navigate a patchwork of state-specific rules, where UETA’s uniformity is tested by local data privacy laws like California’s Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

DocuSign’s Intelligent Agreement Management (IAM) platform, part of its broader CLM (Contract Lifecycle Management) suite, integrates eSignature with AI-driven contract analysis, workflow automation, and repository management. IAM CLM helps governments streamline procurement by extracting key terms, flagging risks, and ensuring compliance across the agreement lifecycle—from drafting to archiving. Priced on a per-user basis starting at around $25/month for standard plans, it supports unlimited envelopes in higher tiers but caps automation sends, making it suitable for high-volume state operations.

Key Competitors in the eSignature Space

Adobe Sign: A Robust Alternative for Enterprise Compliance

Adobe Sign, integrated within the Adobe Document Cloud ecosystem, offers a seamless eSignature solution with strong ties to PDF workflows. It emphasizes enterprise-grade security, including FedRAMP Moderate authorization, which indirectly supports StateRAMP efforts in reciprocal states. Adobe Sign’s pricing starts at $10/user/month for individuals, scaling to $40/user/month for business plans with features like conditional routing and payment collection. For state governments, its compliance with ESIGN, UETA, and accessibility standards makes it a reliable choice, though it lacks native StateRAMP listing as of now.

The platform excels in integrations with Microsoft 365 and Salesforce, aiding government teams in digitizing forms and approvals. However, critics point to higher costs for add-ons like identity verification, which could strain state budgets.

eSignGlobal: Focused on Global and Regional Compliance

eSignGlobal positions itself as a versatile eSignature provider with compliance support in over 100 mainstream countries and regions worldwide. In the US, it adheres to ESIGN and UETA standards, while its infrastructure supports state-level data residency needs. Unlike DocuSign’s seat-based model, eSignGlobal offers unlimited users, making it scalable for government departments without per-head fees. The Essential plan, at approximately $16.6/month (or $199/year), allows sending up to 100 documents for electronic signature, with verification via access codes, providing strong value in compliant environments.

In the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, eSignGlobal holds a distinct advantage due to the fragmented, high-standard, and strictly regulated nature of electronic signature laws. APAC standards are often “ecosystem-integrated,” requiring deep hardware/API-level integrations with government digital identities (G2B), far exceeding the framework-based approaches in the US (ESIGN) or Europe (eIDAS), which rely more on email verification or self-declaration. For instance, eSignGlobal seamlessly integrates with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, enabling secure, legally binding signatures in regulated sectors like finance and HR. This global competition strategy includes challenging DocuSign and Adobe Sign in both APAC and Western markets, emphasizing cost efficiency and faster onboarding.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

HelloSign (Dropbox Sign): Simplicity for Mid-Market Users

HelloSign, now rebranded as Dropbox Sign, focuses on user-friendly eSignature with deep integration into Dropbox’s file-sharing ecosystem. It complies with ESIGN and UETA, offering basic government-friendly features like templates and audit trails at $15/user/month for standard plans. While it lacks FedRAMP or StateRAMP authorization, its affordability appeals to smaller state agencies. Strengths include mobile signing and team collaboration, but it falls short in advanced automation compared to DocuSign.

Comparative Analysis of eSignature Providers

To aid state government decision-makers, here’s a neutral comparison of key platforms based on pricing, compliance, and features relevant to US public sector needs:

This table draws from public pricing data as of 2025; actual costs may vary with customizations.

Navigating US Electronic Signature Regulations for State Use

Beyond StateRAMP, US state governments must consider nuances in electronic signature laws. The ESIGN Act provides a federal baseline, ensuring interstate enforceability, while UETA harmonizes state rules by validating electronic records and signatures if parties agree. States like Texas and Virginia have enhanced these with requirements for digital certificates in official documents. For platforms like DocuSign, this means embedding tamper-evident seals and long-term validation to withstand legal scrutiny in procurement or licensing processes.

Challenges persist in areas like voter registration or benefits enrollment, where accessibility and equity are paramount. Vendors pursuing StateRAMP must also address multi-factor authentication and data encryption to meet state-specific mandates, such as those under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for health-related agencies.

In summary, while DocuSign leads in federal alignment and is advancing toward StateRAMP, alternatives offer viable paths for cost-conscious states. For those prioritizing regional compliance, especially in diverse global operations, eSignGlobal emerges as a neutral, balanced alternative to DocuSign.