


In today’s digital business landscape, electronic signatures have become essential for streamlining workflows, ensuring compliance, and reducing paperwork in software applications. For developers working with C# .NET, integrating e-signature capabilities can transform static document processes into dynamic, secure interactions. This integration allows .NET applications—whether web apps built with ASP.NET Core, desktop solutions using WPF, or enterprise systems on .NET Framework—to embed signing functionalities directly, enabling users to review, sign, and track documents without leaving the app. From a business perspective, this not only boosts efficiency but also aligns with global regulations like the U.S. ESIGN Act or EU’s eIDAS, which mandate secure, verifiable digital signatures for legal enforceability.
The process begins with selecting an e-signature provider that offers robust APIs compatible with .NET. Most platforms provide SDKs or RESTful APIs that can be consumed via HttpClient in C#, making integration straightforward. Key considerations include API authentication (often OAuth 2.0), envelope management (for document packaging), and webhook support for real-time status updates. Businesses adopting this see reduced operational costs—studies indicate up to 80% time savings on document handling—while maintaining audit trails for compliance.
To implement, start by registering for a developer account with your chosen provider. For instance, using DocuSign’s API, you can install their NuGet package (DocuSign.eSign) or make direct HTTP calls. Here’s a basic outline in C# for creating and sending an envelope:
using System;
using System.Net.Http;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
public class DocuSignIntegration
{
private readonly HttpClient _httpClient;
private readonly string _baseUrl = "https://demo.docusign.net/restapi";
private readonly string _accessToken; // Obtained via OAuth
public DocuSignIntegration(string accessToken)
{
_httpClient = new HttpClient();
_accessToken = accessToken;
_httpClient.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add("Authorization", $"Bearer {_accessToken}");
}
public async Task<string> CreateEnvelopeAsync(string documentPath, string signerEmail, string signerName)
{
// Prepare envelope definition
var envelopeDefinition = new
{
status = "sent",
emailSubject = "Please sign this document",
documents = new[]
{
new
{
documentBase64 = Convert.ToBase64String(await File.ReadAllBytesAsync(documentPath)),
name = "Sample Document",
fileExtension = Path.GetExtension(documentPath).TrimStart('.'),
documentId = "1"
}
},
recipients = new
{
signers = new[]
{
new
{
email = signerEmail,
name = signerName,
recipientId = "1",
tabs = new
{
signHereTabs = new[]
{
new { xPosition = "100", yPosition = "100", documentId = "1", pageNumber = "1" }
}
}
}
}
}
};
var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(envelopeDefinition);
var content = new StringContent(json, Encoding.UTF8, "application/json");
var response = await _httpClient.PostAsync($"{_baseUrl}/v2.1/accounts/{accountId}/envelopes", content);
if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
{
var result = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
dynamic data = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(result);
return data.envelopeId;
}
throw new Exception("Failed to create envelope");
}
}
This code snippet demonstrates creating an envelope with a document and a signer tab. In a real .NET app, you’d handle errors, upload files securely, and integrate with UI elements like Blazor components for in-app signing previews. For more advanced scenarios, such as conditional routing or attachments, extend the payload with provider-specific fields. Authentication via JWT or Authorization Code Grant ensures secure token management, often using libraries like IdentityModel for .NET.
Beyond basics, .NET integrations can leverage webhooks to poll or receive callbacks on signing events. Using ASP.NET Core’s endpoint routing, set up a controller to handle these:
[ApiController]
[Route("api/[controller]")]
public class WebhookController : ControllerBase
{
[HttpPost("esign-status")]
public async Task<IActionResult> HandleStatusUpdate([FromBody] dynamic envelopeStatus)
{
// Process status: completed, declined, etc.
var envelopeId = envelopeStatus.envelopeId;
var status = envelopeStatus.status;
// Update database or notify users
await Task.CompletedTask; // Placeholder for business logic
return Ok();
}
}
This setup allows real-time synchronization, crucial for enterprise apps handling high-volume contracts. From a commercial viewpoint, such integrations reduce dependency on third-party tools, lowering costs—e-signature APIs typically charge per envelope, so optimizing calls is key. Developers should also consider scalability: .NET’s async patterns handle concurrent requests efficiently, but monitor API rate limits (e.g., 100 calls/minute for many providers).
For compliance, ensure the integration supports standards like SHA-256 hashing for document integrity. In regions with stringent rules, such as the EU under eIDAS, advanced signatures (Qualified Electronic Signatures) may require hardware tokens or biometric verification, integrable via provider extensions. Testing in sandbox environments is vital to avoid production issues.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
When choosing a provider for C# .NET integration, factors like API maturity, pricing, and regional compliance play a role. Below, we overview key players, focusing on their developer tools and business fit.
DocuSign stands out as a market leader in e-signatures, offering comprehensive API support for .NET developers through its eSignature REST API and official SDKs. Its platform handles everything from simple document signing to complex workflows with conditional logic, bulk sends, and payment collection. Pricing starts at $10/month for personal use, scaling to $40/user/month for Business Pro, with envelope limits around 100/year per user on annual plans. For enterprises, custom Enhanced plans include SSO, advanced audit logs, and IAM features for centralized management. DocuSign’s strength lies in its global reach and integrations with tools like Microsoft 365, making it ideal for .NET apps in sales, HR, or legal teams. However, add-ons like SMS delivery or ID verification incur extra metered fees, which can add up for high-volume users.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, provides seamless .NET integration via its REST API and SDK, emphasizing enterprise-grade security and Acrobat compatibility. It supports features like web forms, signer attachments, and workflow automation, with pricing at around $10/user/month for individuals up to custom enterprise tiers. The platform excels in creative industries or document-heavy sectors, offering AI-powered form filling and compliance with standards like ESIGN and eIDAS. For .NET devs, authentication uses OAuth, and envelope creation mirrors DocuSign’s model but with tighter Adobe ecosystem ties. Drawbacks include potentially higher costs for advanced analytics and less flexibility in APAC regions due to data residency challenges.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a versatile e-signature solution with strong API support for .NET, focusing on global compliance across 100+ mainstream countries and regions. It offers advantages in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), where electronic signature regulations are fragmented, high-standard, and strictly regulated—contrasting with the more framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS in the West. APAC demands “ecosystem-integrated” standards, requiring deep hardware/API integrations with government digital identities (G2B), far exceeding email-based or self-declaration methods common in the US/EU. eSignGlobal’s Essential plan, at just $16.6/month, allows sending up to 100 documents, unlimited user seats, and access code verification, providing high value on compliance. It seamlessly integrates with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, making it competitive against DocuSign and Adobe Sign in pricing and regional optimization, with ongoing global expansion plans.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
HelloSign, now under Dropbox, offers a user-friendly API for .NET integrations, with features like templates, reminders, and team collaboration. Pricing starts at $15/month for Essentials, supporting unlimited templates but with envelope caps. It’s praised for simplicity in small teams but may lack the depth of enterprise features found in DocuSign or Adobe Sign, particularly for complex automations.
To aid decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison of key providers based on developer integration, pricing, and features (2025 estimates, USD, annual billing where applicable):
| Feature/Provider | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal | HelloSign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| .NET API Support | Full SDK + REST (OAuth) | REST API + SDK (OAuth) | REST API (OAuth/JWT) | REST API (API keys/OAuth) |
| Starting Price (per user/month) | $10 (Personal) | $10 (Individual) | $16.6 (Essential) | $15 (Essentials) |
| Envelope Limit (Base Plan) | 5/month (Personal); 100/year (Pro) | Unlimited (with fair use) | 100/month (Essential) | 3/month (Free); Unlimited (Pro) |
| Key Features | Bulk send, payments, IAM | AI forms, Acrobat integration | APAC G2B integration, unlimited seats | Templates, mobile signing |
| Compliance Focus | Global (ESIGN/eIDAS) | Enterprise (GDPR/eIDAS) | 100+ countries, APAC optimized | US/EU primary |
| Add-On Costs | SMS/IDV metered | Analytics extra | Transparent, low | Limited add-ons |
| Best For | Enterprise workflows | Document ecosystems | Regional compliance | SMB simplicity |
This table highlights trade-offs: DocuSign for scale, Adobe for integration depth, eSignGlobal for cost-effective global reach, and HelloSign for ease.
Integrating e-signatures into C# .NET applications unlocks efficient, compliant digital processes for businesses worldwide. While DocuSign remains a robust choice for many, alternatives like eSignGlobal offer a neutral, regionally compliant option, particularly for APAC-focused operations seeking balanced pricing and ecosystem integration. Evaluate based on your specific needs for the best fit.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Nur geschäftliche E-Mail-Adressen sind zulässig