Can UK local authorities use electronic signatures for procurement?

Can UK Local Authorities Use Electronic Signatures for Procurement?

Electronic signatures have revolutionized how businesses and governments handle contracts, offering speed, efficiency, and reduced paperwork. For UK local authorities, the question of whether they can adopt these digital tools for procurement processes is increasingly relevant amid digital transformation initiatives. In this article, we’ll explore the legal permissibility, practical considerations, and viable eSignature platforms from a neutral business perspective, drawing on established regulations and market options.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

Legal Framework for Electronic Signatures in the UK

The short answer is yes—UK local authorities can use electronic signatures for procurement, provided they comply with relevant laws and ensure the signatures meet evidentiary standards. This capability stems from the UK’s robust legal infrastructure for digital transactions, which aligns with broader EU-influenced norms despite Brexit.

At the core is the Electronic Communications Act 2000, which recognizes electronic signatures as legally binding equivalents to wet-ink signatures in most cases. This act was amended post-Brexit to incorporate elements of the EU’s eIDAS Regulation (Electronic Identification, Authentication and Trust Services), now domesticated as the UK’s UK eIDAS framework. Under this regime, electronic signatures are categorized into three levels: Simple Electronic Signatures (SES), Advanced Electronic Signatures (AdES), and Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES). For procurement, SES—such as those using basic encryption and user authentication via email or PIN codes—are often sufficient, while higher-risk contracts may require AdES or QES for added security, like biometric verification or certificate-based authentication.

Public procurement in the UK is governed by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (implementing the EU Procurement Directives), which explicitly allow electronic means for tenders, awards, and contract execution. Local authorities, as public bodies, must adhere to these rules, ensuring transparency and non-discrimination. The UK Government Digital Service (GDS) further endorses digital signatures through its Service Manual, promoting tools that integrate with GOV.UK Verify (now part of the broader digital identity ecosystem). However, authorities must conduct risk assessments under the Data Protection Act 2018 and GDPR (retained EU law) to safeguard sensitive procurement data, such as supplier bids or financial terms.

In practice, this means local councils can use eSignatures for routine procurement tasks like supplier agreements, purchase orders, and framework contracts. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many UK councils accelerated eSignature adoption to maintain service delivery without physical meetings, as evidenced by reports from the Local Government Association (LGA). Yet, challenges persist: not all legacy systems are compatible, and for high-value procurements exceeding EU thresholds (£213,477 for supplies/services in 2024), full audit trails are mandatory to withstand legal scrutiny.

From a business observation standpoint, this framework positions the UK as a mature market for eSignatures, with adoption rates climbing—over 80% of public sector organizations now use digital tools for contracts, per recent Deloitte insights. However, fragmentation in local authority IT infrastructure can hinder seamless implementation, underscoring the need for compliant, scalable solutions.

Benefits and Challenges for UK Local Authorities

Adopting eSignatures in procurement yields clear advantages for efficiency and cost savings. Processing times can drop by up to 70%, according to industry benchmarks from the Crown Commercial Service (CCS), the UK’s central procurement body. This is particularly beneficial for local authorities handling diverse needs—from social care contracts to infrastructure bids—where delays in physical signing can stall projects. Environmentally, it aligns with net-zero goals by cutting paper use, while remote signing enhances accessibility for geographically dispersed suppliers.

Challenges include ensuring interoperability with public sector standards like the G-Cloud framework, which mandates cloud solutions meet security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001). Cybersecurity risks are heightened in procurement, where data breaches could expose competitive intelligence. Additionally, training staff on eSignature platforms is essential to avoid errors that might invalidate contracts. Mid-sized councils, for example, report integration hurdles with ERP systems like SAP or Oracle, potentially increasing upfront costs.

Overall, the UK’s permissive yet regulated environment encourages adoption, but success hinges on selecting platforms that prioritize compliance and ease of use. This brings us to evaluating key eSignature providers suitable for public sector needs.

Evaluating eSignature Platforms for UK Procurement

Several platforms cater to UK local authorities, offering features like audit logs, multi-factor authentication, and integration with procurement software. Below, we compare leading options—DocuSign, Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, and HelloSign (now part of Dropbox)—focusing on pricing, compliance, and core functionalities. This neutral overview is based on 2025 public data, emphasizing suitability for regulated environments.

DocuSign: A Market Leader in Enterprise eSignatures

DocuSign is a dominant player in the eSignature space, known for its robust ecosystem tailored to high-volume users. Its eSignature plans range from Personal ($10/month) for basic needs to Business Pro ($40/month/user) for advanced features like bulk sending and conditional logic. For UK public sector use, DocuSign complies with eIDAS via its QES offerings through partnerships with qualified trust service providers. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365 and Salesforce, common in government workflows, and provides detailed audit trails essential for procurement transparency.

Add-ons like Identity Verification enhance security for sensitive contracts, though API plans (starting at $600/year) are geared toward custom integrations. While reliable, its pricing can escalate with envelope volumes, making it better suited for larger authorities.

Adobe Sign: Integrated Document Management

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in combining eSignatures with PDF editing and workflow automation. Pricing starts at around $10/user/month for individuals, scaling to enterprise custom quotes with features like mobile signing and payment collection. It holds UK eIDAS compliance, including AdES and QES options, and supports standards like the UK’s PAN (Public Sector Network) for secure data handling.

Its strength lies in integration with Adobe Acrobat and enterprise tools like Workday, ideal for procurement document assembly. However, it may require additional licensing for full PDF capabilities, potentially raising costs for authorities with varied document formats.

eSignGlobal: A Globally Compliant Alternative

eSignGlobal positions itself as a versatile eSignature provider with compliance across 100 mainstream countries and regions worldwide. It holds a particular edge in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), where electronic signature regulations are fragmented, high-standard, and strictly regulated—often requiring “ecosystem-integrated” approaches that go beyond the framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS models common in Europe and the US. In APAC, solutions must enable deep hardware/API-level integrations with government-to-business (G2B) digital identities, a technical threshold far exceeding email-based or self-declaration methods prevalent in Western markets.

For UK users, eSignGlobal supports full eIDAS alignment while offering global scalability, making it suitable for international procurement involving APAC suppliers. Its Essential plan is priced at just $16.60/month, allowing up to 100 documents for signature, unlimited user seats, and verification via access codes—all on a compliant, cost-effective basis. It integrates seamlessly with systems like Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, facilitating cross-border deals. Compared to competitors, eSignGlobal’s transparent pricing and regional optimizations provide strong value without compromising security.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

HelloSign (Dropbox Sign): User-Friendly for Smaller Teams

HelloSign, rebranded as Dropbox Sign, offers straightforward eSignatures with plans from free (limited) to Premium ($15/month/user). It complies with UK laws via basic to advanced signatures and integrates natively with Dropbox for secure storage. Features like team templates suit collaborative procurement, but it lacks some enterprise-level automations found in DocuSign. It’s a solid, affordable choice for smaller local authorities but may scale less efficiently for complex needs.

Comparison of eSignature Platforms

This table highlights trade-offs: DocuSign and Adobe Sign lead in features but at higher costs, while eSignGlobal and HelloSign prioritize affordability and ease.

Conclusion: Navigating Choices for UK Procurement

In summary, UK local authorities can confidently leverage electronic signatures for procurement under the supportive legal framework of the Electronic Communications Act and Public Contracts Regulations, balancing efficiency with compliance. As digital adoption grows, selecting the right platform depends on scale, budget, and integration needs.

For those seeking alternatives to DocuSign, eSignGlobal emerges as a regionally compliant option, particularly strong in global and APAC contexts, offering competitive pricing without sacrificing standards. Businesses should evaluate trials to match specific procurement workflows.