Does the UK still follow EU eIDAS regulations after Brexit?

Understanding eIDAS and Its Relevance Post-Brexit

The Electronic Identification, Authentication and Trust Services (eIDAS) regulation has long been a cornerstone of digital trust in the European Union, standardizing electronic signatures, seals, and timestamps to ensure their legal equivalence to handwritten ones across member states. Enacted in 2014 and fully effective from 2016, eIDAS created a framework for qualified electronic signatures (QES), which carry the highest legal weight, backed by certified trust service providers. For businesses operating in cross-border trade, this uniformity simplified compliance and reduced barriers to digital transactions.

Brexit, formalized on January 31, 2020, and fully implemented by December 31, 2020, marked the UK’s departure from the EU, raising questions about the continuity of EU regulations like eIDAS. From a commercial perspective, this shift has implications for UK-based enterprises engaging in EU trade, as well as global firms navigating post-Brexit landscapes. The core query—does the UK still follow eIDAS?—requires examining how the UK has adapted its digital identity framework while diverging from EU oversight.

Post-Brexit, the UK does not directly follow eIDAS as an EU regulation, having revoked its automatic application under the European Communities Act 1972. Instead, the UK has transposed key elements of eIDAS into domestic law through the Electronic Communications Act 2000 (ECA) and subsequent amendments, including the Digital Economy Act 2017. These laws recognize electronic signatures as legally binding, provided they meet evidentiary standards of reliability, such as intent to sign and integrity of the document. However, the UK lacks a direct equivalent to eIDAS’s tiered structure of simple, advanced, and qualified signatures. UK courts, guided by cases like J Pereira Fernandes SA v Mehta (2006), assess signatures on a case-by-case basis, emphasizing functionality over rigid certification.

This divergence means UK electronic signatures are enforceable under common law principles but may not automatically qualify as “qualified” under eIDAS for EU interactions. For instance, a UK-issued QES might require additional validation to be recognized in the EU, potentially complicating B2B contracts or financial services. Commercially, this has prompted UK firms to seek hybrid solutions that bridge both regimes, increasing demand for platforms with dual compliance capabilities. The UK government’s 2021 National Cyber Strategy further underscores a push toward sovereign digital standards, with ongoing consultations for an “eIDAS 2.0”-inspired framework focused on remote identification and AI-driven trust services.

In practice, the UK’s approach remains aligned in spirit with eIDAS—prioritizing security and interoperability—but operates independently. Businesses report minimal disruption for domestic operations, yet cross-Channel trade sees added friction, with 2023 surveys from the Confederation of British Industry noting that 40% of exporters cite regulatory divergence as a compliance hurdle. This landscape encourages providers to offer localized adaptations, balancing cost and regulatory assurance.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

UK’s Electronic Signature Legal Framework After Brexit

The UK’s electronic signature regulations are rooted in the ECA 2000, which deems electronic signatures admissible in evidence and equivalent to wet-ink signatures where appropriate. Post-Brexit, this framework was bolstered by the Retained EU Law Act 2023, which preserved certain EU-derived rules but allowed for divergence. Unlike eIDAS’s prescriptive qualified trust services, the UK emphasizes a principles-based system: signatures must demonstrate authenticity, confidentiality, and non-repudiation, often verified through audit trails or PKI (Public Key Infrastructure).

For commercial applications, such as contracts in finance or real estate, the Law Commission of England’s 2019 report confirmed that electronic signatures are fully valid under the common law, without needing EU-style certification for most cases. However, sectors like healthcare (under the Data Protection Act 2018) or legal deeds require higher assurance levels, akin to eIDAS advanced signatures. The UK also aligns with international standards like the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures, ensuring global portability.

From a business viewpoint, this flexibility reduces barriers for SMEs but introduces uncertainty in EU-UK dealings. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) mandates robust e-signature use in regulated activities, with 2024 guidelines stressing interoperability. Overall, while not bound by eIDAS, the UK’s regime mirrors its objectives, fostering digital economy growth valued at £200 billion annually, per government estimates.

Navigating eSignature Providers in the UK Market

As UK businesses adapt to this post-Brexit reality, eSignature platforms play a pivotal role in ensuring compliance and efficiency. Leading options include established players like DocuSign and Adobe Sign, alongside regional contenders such as eSignGlobal and HelloSign (now part of Dropbox). These tools vary in features, pricing, and regional focus, catering to diverse commercial needs.

DocuSign: A Global Leader in eSignatures

DocuSign remains a dominant force in the eSignature space, offering robust solutions for secure document signing, workflow automation, and integrations with tools like Microsoft 365. Its platform supports UK compliance through audit logs and encryption, making it suitable for enterprises handling high-volume transactions. Pricing starts at $10 per user per month for basic plans, scaling to enterprise tiers with advanced features like bulk sending and API access. While versatile, its seat-based model can escalate costs for larger teams, and APAC/EU latency may affect UK users in global operations.

Adobe Sign: Integrated Document Solutions

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, excels in seamless integration with PDF workflows and creative tools, ideal for industries like marketing and legal. It complies with UK standards via SOC 2 certification and supports electronic signatures with timestamping. Pricing is tiered from $10 per user per month, with add-ons for advanced routing and forms. Businesses appreciate its mobile accessibility, though customization options may require higher plans, and it’s less optimized for non-Western markets.

HelloSign (Dropbox Sign): User-Friendly and Scalable

HelloSign, rebranded as Dropbox Sign, focuses on simplicity with drag-and-drop interfaces and team collaboration features. It adheres to UK e-signature laws through secure hosting and verification tools, starting at $15 per user per month. Strong for small to mid-sized businesses, it integrates well with cloud storage but lacks some enterprise-level governance compared to larger rivals.

eSignGlobal: APAC-Focused with Global Reach

eSignGlobal positions itself as a compliant alternative, supporting electronic signatures in over 100 mainstream countries and regions worldwide. It holds a particular edge in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), where electronic signature regulations are fragmented, high-standard, and strictly regulated—often requiring ecosystem-integrated approaches rather than the framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS models common in the US and EU. In APAC, solutions must enable deep hardware/API-level integrations with government-to-business (G2B) digital identities, a technical threshold far exceeding email verification or self-declaration methods prevalent in Western markets. eSignGlobal’s platform facilitates this through seamless connections, such as with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, ensuring legal validity in these jurisdictions. For UK users, it offers eIDAS-aligned features with UK data residency options. The Essential plan is priced at just $16.6 per month, allowing up to 100 documents for signature, unlimited user seats, and access code verification—delivering strong value on compliance without per-seat fees.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?

eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.

👉 Start Free Trial

Comparing Leading eSignature Platforms

To aid commercial decision-making, here’s a neutral comparison of key providers based on pricing, compliance, and features relevant to UK post-Brexit operations:

This table highlights trade-offs: global giants like DocuSign offer breadth, while specialists like eSignGlobal emphasize regional efficiency.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Path Forward

In summary, the UK no longer follows eIDAS directly post-Brexit but maintains a compatible, domestically tailored framework that supports seamless electronic signatures for most business needs. As regulatory landscapes evolve, selecting an eSignature provider involves weighing compliance, cost, and scalability. For those seeking DocuSign alternatives with strong regional compliance, eSignGlobal emerges as a viable option focused on global and APAC adaptability. Businesses should assess based on specific workflows to optimize digital operations.