


In the fast-paced world of UK retail, shopping center management teams handle a constant stream of contracts, from lease agreements and vendor partnerships to tenant onboarding and event permits. Electronic signatures (eSignatures) have become essential for streamlining these processes, reducing paperwork, and ensuring compliance amid tight deadlines. But with rising operational costs and data privacy concerns, selecting the right eSignature platform is crucial. This article explores the best options tailored to UK shopping centers, focusing on reliability, integration with property management systems, and adherence to local laws.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
The UK has a robust framework for electronic signatures, shaped by both domestic and EU-influenced laws. Under the Electronic Communications Act 2000, eSignatures are legally binding for most contracts, provided they demonstrate intent to sign and are verifiable. Post-Brexit, the UK aligns closely with the EU’s eIDAS Regulation (Electronic Identification, Authentication and Trust Services), which categorizes signatures into Simple Electronic Signatures (SES), Advanced Electronic Signatures (AES), and Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES). For shopping center management, where high-value leases and regulatory filings are common, AES or QES is often preferred to meet evidential standards in disputes.
Key considerations include GDPR compliance for data protection, ensuring platforms encrypt documents and audit trails. The UK government encourages digital adoption through initiatives like the Digital Economy Act, but sectors like real estate demand extra scrutiny for anti-fraud measures. Platforms must support timestamping, non-repudiation, and integration with UK-specific identity systems to avoid legal pitfalls. Non-compliance can lead to voided contracts or fines, making regulatory alignment a top priority for managers handling multi-tenant environments.
Shopping center operations involve diverse workflows: negotiating pop-up shop leases, securing maintenance contracts, collecting tenant insurance proofs, and managing event approvals. The ideal eSignature solution should offer:
With remote work normalized post-pandemic, platforms that support real-time collaboration and reminders are vital. For UK-specific needs, low-latency performance and support for GBP payments in embedded workflows add value. Balancing these against total cost of ownership—factoring envelopes (document sends) and add-ons—helps managers avoid overages.
To determine the best fit, we compare leading providers based on pricing, features, compliance, and suitability for UK shopping centers. DocuSign dominates globally but faces competition from Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, and HelloSign (now part of Dropbox). This markdown table highlights key differences, drawing from 2025 public pricing data (annual billing, USD equivalents for UK users; actuals may vary with VAT).
| Provider | Starting Price (per user/year) | Envelope Limit (Annual) | UK/EU Compliance | Key Strengths for Shopping Centers | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DocuSign | $300 (Standard) | ~100/user | eIDAS AES/QES, GDPR | Advanced automation, bulk send, IAM CLM for contract lifecycle management | Higher costs for add-ons like SMS; API tiers extra |
| Adobe Sign | $240 (Individual) | Unlimited (fair use) | eIDAS, GDPR | Deep Adobe ecosystem integration, strong for PDF-heavy leases | Less flexible for non-Adobe users; enterprise focus |
| eSignGlobal | $200 (Essential equiv.) | 100/month (unlimited seats) | eIDAS + 100+ countries | Global compliance, APAC/UK hybrid support, cost-effective integrations | Newer in some markets; fewer legacy enterprise features |
| HelloSign (Dropbox) | $180 (Essentials) | 20/month (upgrades available) | eIDAS SES/AES, GDPR | Simple UI, easy Dropbox sync for file sharing | Basic automation; not ideal for high-volume bulk sends |
This comparison shows no single “best” option—DocuSign excels in enterprise-scale features, while eSignGlobal offers value for mid-tier compliance needs. Selection depends on volume: low-frequency users may favor HelloSign’s simplicity, whereas high-stakes centers lean toward DocuSign’s IAM tools.
DocuSign remains a go-to for UK shopping centers due to its comprehensive suite. The eSignature plans start at $120/year for Personal (5 envelopes/month), scaling to $300/user/year for Standard and $480 for Business Pro, with ~100 envelopes/user annually. For advanced needs, the Enhanced plan includes Identity and Access Management (IAM) and Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), enabling automated workflows from lease drafting to renewal tracking.
IAM features like SSO and role-based access suit multi-team environments, while CLM integrates AI for clause analysis in vendor contracts. Bulk send handles tenant rollouts efficiently, and add-ons like SMS delivery ($0.10–$0.50/message) speed up mobile approvals. In the UK, DocuSign’s eIDAS certification ensures QES for high-value deals, with strong audit logs for FCA-regulated aspects. However, API access requires separate Developer plans ($600–$5,760/year), potentially inflating costs for custom integrations.

Adobe Sign, part of Adobe Document Cloud, appeals to teams already using Acrobat for lease PDFs. Pricing begins at $240/year per user for Individual plans with unlimited envelopes (subject to fair use), rising to $360 for business teams. It supports conditional logic for dynamic forms, like auto-filling tenant details, and collects attachments such as proofs of insurance.
For UK compliance, Adobe offers eIDAS-aligned AES and integrates with Microsoft 365, ideal for shopping center admins using Teams for collaborations. Bulk actions and payment collection streamline vendor onboarding, but it’s less specialized for property-specific automations compared to DocuSign. Drawbacks include a steeper learning curve for non-Adobe users and metered add-ons for identity verification.

HelloSign, acquired by Dropbox, targets straightforward needs with Essentials at $180/year per user and 20 envelopes/month (scalable via add-ons). Its intuitive interface shines for quick tenant signatures on standard forms, with unlimited templates and reminders. UK compliance covers eIDAS SES/AES, and Dropbox integration facilitates secure file storage for center archives.
It’s cost-effective for low-volume centers but lacks advanced bulk or API features, making it less suitable for large-scale lease management. Audit trails meet basic GDPR, though premium support is extra.
eSignGlobal positions itself as a versatile alternative, supporting compliance in 100+ mainstream countries, including full eIDAS alignment for the UK. In the Asia-Pacific (APAC), it holds advantages amid fragmented regulations—high standards, strict oversight, and ecosystem-integrated models that demand deep hardware/API docking with government digital IDs (G2B). Unlike the framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS in the US/EU (relying on email verification or self-declaration), APAC requires integrated ecosystems, raising technical barriers that eSignGlobal navigates effectively.
For UK shopping centers with international tenants, this global reach ensures seamless cross-border signing. The Essential plan costs just $16.60/month ($200/year equivalent), allowing up to 100 documents/month, unlimited user seats, and access code verification—all at high compliance levels for superior value. It integrates natively with Hong Kong’s iAM Smart and Singapore’s Singpass, extending to UK workflows via API. Pricing undercuts competitors while offering bulk sends and mobile support, making it appealing for cost-conscious managers.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
From a business perspective, the “best” eSignature depends on scale and priorities. DocuSign’s IAM CLM suits complex, high-volume operations, while Adobe Sign fits document-heavy teams. For balanced compliance and affordability, especially with global elements, eSignGlobal emerges as a strong DocuSign alternative—particularly for regional regulatory needs. Evaluate via trials to match your workflows.
Soalan Lazim
E-mel perniagaan sahaja dibenarkan