


In the evolving landscape of property transactions, digital signatures have become a cornerstone for efficiency and security. The UK Land Registry, responsible for maintaining the official record of land ownership, plays a pivotal role in ensuring that these signatures meet stringent legal standards. This process not only streamlines conveyancing but also upholds the integrity of property records amid rising cyber threats.

Comparing eSignature platforms with DocuSign or Adobe Sign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
The United Kingdom has a robust legal foundation for electronic signatures, primarily governed by the Electronic Communications Act 2000. This legislation recognizes electronic signatures as equivalent to wet-ink signatures in most contexts, provided they demonstrate the signer’s intent and identity. For higher-assurance scenarios, such as property deeds, the UK aligns with the EU’s eIDAS Regulation (retained post-Brexit via the Electronic Identification Regulation 2024 proposals), which categorizes signatures into Simple, Advanced, and Qualified levels.
Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES) offer the highest evidential weight, requiring certification by a Qualified Trust Service Provider (QTSP) and secure hardware like Hardware Security Modules (HSMs). In property law, the Land Registration Act 2002 mandates that documents affecting land must be signed in a way that verifies authenticity, often necessitating KYC (Know Your Customer) checks. Non-compliance can lead to rejected registrations, delaying transactions. These laws emphasize reliability, especially in a market where property fraud costs the UK economy over £1 billion annually, according to recent industry reports.
The UK Land Registry’s verification process for digital signers is meticulous, designed to prevent fraud while facilitating digital conveyancing. At its core, the system relies on a multi-layered approach combining technological standards, identity proofs, and procedural safeguards. This ensures that only authorized parties can execute documents like transfers of ownership or mortgages.
The Land Registry accepts digital submissions through approved platforms like the Digital Registration Service (DRS) or HM Land Registry’s e-Conveyancing network. Signers must use certified eSignature tools compliant with eIDAS or UK equivalents. For instance, deeds submitted electronically must include metadata proving the signer’s control over the signing device and timestamping via a trusted service.
Verification begins with identity proofing, where signers provide government-issued ID (e.g., passport, driving license) during onboarding. The Land Registry mandates biometric or multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-value transactions. Under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017, solicitors or conveyancers acting on behalf of clients perform initial KYC, cross-referencing details against databases like the Electoral Roll or Credit Reference Agencies.
For QES, the signer uses a digital certificate from a QTSP, such as those accredited by the UK Trust Mark scheme. This certificate links the signature to a verified identity, often involving facial recognition or liveness detection to confirm the signer’s presence. In practice, tools like DocuSign’s Identity Verification (IDV) add-on can integrate here, scanning IDs and performing knowledge-based authentication (KBA) questions unique to the UK context.
Once signed, the document generates an immutable audit trail, including IP logs, timestamps, and signer actions. The Land Registry reviews this upon submission, using forensic tools to detect anomalies like IP spoofing. If discrepancies arise, manual verification may involve contacting the signer or notary. For deeds, the “execution formalities” require witnesses, even digitally, verified through video calls or shared MFA.
Despite advancements, challenges persist: not all legacy systems support full digital verification, leading to hybrid processes. The Land Registry’s 2023 Digital Strategy aims to expand QES adoption by 2025, potentially integrating with the UK’s Digital Identity Framework. Fraud rates have dropped 20% since digital mandates, but experts note the need for better cross-border compatibility, especially with EU eIDAS 2.0 updates.
This verification rigor underscores the UK’s commitment to secure digital property markets, balancing innovation with legal certainty. Businesses navigating these requirements often turn to compliant eSignature providers to streamline compliance.
In the competitive eSignature market, platforms like DocuSign, Adobe Sign, eSignGlobal, and HelloSign (now Dropbox Sign) offer tools tailored for regulatory environments like the UK’s. From a business perspective, selecting the right solution involves weighing features, pricing, and integration with local laws. Below, we explore key players before a comparative overview.
DocuSign, a market leader, provides comprehensive identity verification through its eSignature and IAM (Identity and Access Management) features. For UK users, it supports QES via partnerships with QTSPs and integrates IDV for document scans, biometrics, and SMS authentication. Pricing starts at $10/month for Personal plans, scaling to $40/user/month for Business Pro with bulk send and payments. It’s ideal for high-volume legal teams but can incur add-on costs for advanced compliance.

Adobe Sign excels in enterprise integrations, particularly with Microsoft and Adobe ecosystems, making it suitable for UK conveyancing firms using Acrobat for document prep. It verifies identities via MFA, KBA, and eIDAS-compliant signatures, with options for custom workflows. Pricing is usage-based, around $10–$40/user/month, emphasizing scalability for teams handling complex audits. However, setup can be intricate for smaller operations.

eSignGlobal positions itself as a compliant alternative, supporting electronic signatures in over 100 mainstream countries, including full UK eIDAS alignment. It shines in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, where electronic signatures face fragmentation, high standards, and strict regulation—contrasting the more framework-based ESIGN/eIDAS models in the US/EU. APAC demands “ecosystem-integrated” solutions, requiring deep hardware/API docking with government digital identities (G2B), far beyond email or self-declaration methods common in the West.
For UK Land Registry needs, eSignGlobal offers access code verification, biometric checks, and SSO integrations. Its Essential plan at $16.6/month allows up to 100 documents, unlimited user seats, and seamless ties to systems like Hong Kong’s iAM Smart or Singapore’s Singpass—highlighting APAC advantages while competing globally against DocuSign and Adobe Sign through lower costs and faster regional performance. This makes it cost-effective for cross-border firms, with on-premises options for data sovereignty.

Looking for a smarter alternative to DocuSign?
eSignGlobal delivers a more flexible and cost-effective eSignature solution with global compliance, transparent pricing, and faster onboarding.
HelloSign, acquired by Dropbox, focuses on simplicity with drag-and-drop signing and basic ID verification via email links and MFA. It complies with UK laws through audit trails and templates but lacks deep QES support without add-ons. Pricing starts at $15/month for Essentials, appealing to small businesses, though it may require supplements for Land Registry-level scrutiny.
| Feature/Aspect | DocuSign | Adobe Sign | eSignGlobal | HelloSign (Dropbox Sign) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK/eIDAS Compliance | Full QES support via QTSPs; IDV add-on | eIDAS-aligned; strong MFA/KBA | 100+ countries incl. UK; access code & biometrics | Basic compliance; audit trails, limited QES |
| Identity Verification Methods | Biometrics, SMS, document scan | MFA, KBA, integrations | Access code, SSO, regional G2B (e.g., iAM Smart) | Email/MFA; optional add-ons |
| Pricing (Entry Level, Monthly USD) | $10 (Personal) | $10 (Individual) | $16.6 (Essential, unlimited users) | $15 (Essentials) |
| Envelope/Document Limits | 5–100/user/month | Usage-based | 100 docs (Essential) | Unlimited templates, 3 docs/month free |
| Key Strengths | Enterprise scalability, bulk send | Workflow automation | APAC/global cost-efficiency, no seat fees | Simplicity, Dropbox integration |
| Limitations | Add-on costs for advanced features | Complex setup | Less brand recognition in EU | Basic for high-security needs |
| Best For | Large legal teams | Integrated offices | Cross-border APAC/UK firms | SMBs with light use |
This comparison highlights trade-offs: DocuSign and Adobe Sign dominate in enterprise features, while eSignGlobal and HelloSign prioritize affordability and ease.
Businesses in the UK property sector benefit from eSignature tools that align with Land Registry standards, reducing fraud risks and speeding transactions. While established players like DocuSign offer proven reliability, regional needs—especially in fragmented markets—call for versatile options. For DocuSign users seeking alternatives with strong compliance, eSignGlobal emerges as a neutral, regionally optimized choice, balancing global reach with cost savings. Evaluating trials based on specific workflows remains key to informed decisions.
Часто задаваемые вопросы
Разрешено использовать только корпоративные адреса электронной почты