範本庫 / Tender Evaluation: <Project Name>

Procurement – driving better value for money

Tender Evaluation: <Project Name>

1

Preparation

Supplier

Supplier:

Evaluators

Evaluated by:

Reviewed by:

Evaluation Summary

Part

Sections – Information requested

Commentary (brief)

Maximum Points Possible

Points

1

General Information

Pass/Fail

2

Financials [If included in weighting]

3

Example: Industry standards, accreditations

4

Part

Financials (if evaluated separately)

Comments (brief)

Points or relative position

Financials

Overall Score (Total Points)

Exceptional | Acceptable | Marginal | Unacceptable:

:

Overall Comments:

Crown Copyright

Section: Non-budgetary / Qualitative

Complete the table below to confirm supplier has complied with the mandatory conditions:

Section:

[Name of section]

Q

Description of criteria

Guidance notes

Justification for score | Comments

Points

(non-weighted)

Weighting

(if weighted)

Total

Points

10

Brief description only – enough to clearly link to the Procurement Plan & RFx

Use this for guidance and tips for evaluators

Keep these succinct but complete enough that other evaluators or auditors ‘get it’ in terms of why this score has been arrived at.

Numbers or words

If using weighted method

11

Example: Level of accreditation amongst supplier’s consultants

[Apply % of consultants qualified as the score – eg. If half are qualified score is 5 (out of 10)]

All ten consultants are fully accredited.

10

10%

2

12

Example: Public Liability Insurance of at least $1M is in place.

[Letter from insurance coy must be attached – mark as either ‘Pass (=10)’ or ‘Fail (=0)]

Letter from insurance company attached

Pass

Tip: Feel free to ‘shade out’ columns not required

0

Add more as required…

Section Score

[ Section score = ‘0’ if any criteria scores a ‘Fail’ ]

Weighted Sub-total (Points):

2

Template instructions:

Template instructions: add more sections as required – see Template ‘Widget Park’ at back of document]

Procurement – driving better value for money

Section: Budgetary

Crown Copyright

The Template ‘Widget Park’

What’s this section for?

You might have guessed that the ‘Widget Park’ is the place where we have ‘parked’ a few extra bits ands pieces that you may decide to include in your template, as they better meet your particular evaluation needs.

Delete this section once your template is ready to go

[Template instructions: add more of these sections as required – if using weighted scoring method]

Section:

[Name of section]

Q

Description of criteria

Guidance notes

Justification for score | Comments

Score

Weighting

(if weighted)

Total

Points

[Template instructions: add more of these sections if using non-weighted numeric scoring method]

Section:

[Name of section]

Q

Description of criteria

Guidance notes

Justification for score | Comments

Points

Section Score

[ Section score = ‘0’ if any criteria scores a ‘Fail’ ]

Sub-total:

#

您專屬的合約模板庫已就緒。輸入資訊即可下載。